Case law

Harrold v. Coble

261 F. Supp. 29 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Dec 5, 1966

Coble, Chairman of the Board Leon G. Coble, Vice Chairman of the Board James F. Kirkpatrick, President Stuart Honaker Dear Sirs: I recently requested settlement of the benefits due me under the H. L. … Serio v. Liss, 189 F.Supp. 358 (Dist.N.J.1960). At the outset, the defendants strenuously argue that the Court is without jurisdiction to determine the controversy for the reason that H. L.

Googerdy v. North Carolina Agricultural & Technical State University

386 F. Supp. 2d 618 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 24, 2005

Board of Governors of Univ. of N.C., 902 F.2d 1134 , 1139 n. 6 (4th Cir.1990) (recognizing the Board of Governors of the University of North Carolina as an alter ego of the State of North Carolina); Roberson v. … If a faculty member is not satisfied with the stated reasons or the outcome of the hearing, he may appeal to *628 the Board of Trustees (id. § 4.1.) and then make a further appeal to the Board of Governors. Id.

Price v. Cannon Mills

113 F.R.D. 66 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 6, 1986

Moody (v) J. Kennerley (vi) F. Nesbit (vii) D. Clayton (viii) C. Brewer (e) When Nancy Lytton did pallot jack operator job she got less than Graylen Brown, male, when he performed this job which was his regular job. … See, e.g., McCarthy v.

Wright v. Masonite Corporation

237 F. Supp. 129 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 8, 1965

Watts v. Pama Manufacturing Company, 256 N.C. 611 , 124 S.E.2d 809 (1962). … Perhaps the two leading cases in North Carolina dealing with the law of nuisance are Morgan v. High Penn Oil Co., et al., 238 N.C. 185 , 77 S.E.2d 682 (1953), and Watts v.

Public Impact, LLC v. Boston Consulting Group, Inc.

117 F. Supp. 3d 732 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 3, 2015

Prods. & Holdings, LLC v. R.T.G. Furniture Corp., 825 F.Supp.2d 664, 677 (M.D.N.C.2011). In Christian Science Board of Directors of the First Church of Christ, Scientist v. … See Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 2846, *738 2851 , 180 L.Ed.2d 796 (2011); Helicopteros Nacionales de Colombia, S.A. v.

Parkway Gallery Furniture, Inc. v. Kittinger/Pennsylvania House Group, Inc.

116 F.R.D. 46 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · May 8, 1987

O’Leary v. Purcell Co., Inc., 108 F.R.D. 641, 646 (M.D.N.C.1985)-(collecting cases); Ranney-Brown Distributors v. E.T. Barwick, 75 F.R.D. 3 (S.D.Ohio 1977). … Liggett Group, Inc. v. Brown & Williamson Tob.

Cook v. BAKER EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING CO., INC.

431 F. Supp. 517 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 16, 1977

See also Douglas v. W. C. Mallison and Sons, 265 N.C. 362 , 144 S.E.2d 138 (1965). The Fourth Circuit in Brown v. … Both the North Carolina Supreme Court in Tyson v. Long Manufacturing Co., supra, and the Fourth Circuit in Brown v. General Motors Corp., 355 F.2d at 819 , cited with approval Campo v.

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Fowler

27 F.2d 421 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jun 21, 1928

The law applicable to the facts in the instant case is clearly and ably stated in the opinion of Circuit Judge Parker in Hartford Indemnity Co. v. Board of Education (C. C. … A. 600; Farmer v. Williard, 71 N. C. 284 ; Cowan v. Withrow, 111 N. C. 306 , 16 S. E. 397 ; National Life Insurance Co. v. Grady, 185 N. C. 353 , 117 S. E. 289 .

Madison River Management Co. v. Business Management Software Corp.

351 F. Supp. 2d 436 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 5, 2005

See Brown v. McCormick, 23 F.Supp.2d 594, 608 (D.Md.1998) (finding the plaintiffs state law claims, including breach of contract, preempted). … Berge v. Board of Trs. of the Univ. of Ala., 104 F.3d 1453, 1463 (4th Cir.1997) (citations omitted).

Fincher v. Scott

352 F. Supp. 117 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Dec 12, 1972

A contention that provisions of state law like those before us violate the Equal Protection Clause was also made in Green v. Board of Elections, 380 F.2d 445 (2d Cir. 1967). … Virginia Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 [ 86 S.Ct. 1079 , 16 L.Ed.2d 169 ] (1966).

Lee v. Crest Chemical Co.

583 F. Supp. 131 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Feb 9, 1984

Parsons v. Hornblower & Weeks — Hemphill, Noyes, . 447 F.Supp. 482, 487 (M.D.N.C. 1977), aff'd, 571 F.2d 203 (4th Cir.1978), quoting Bland v. Norfolk & Southern Railway Co., 406 F.2d 863, 866 (4th Cir. 1969). … Reid v. Eckerds Drugs, Inc., 40 N.C.App. 476 , 253 S.E.2d 344 , cert. denied, 297 N.C. 612 , 257 S.E.2d 219 (1979). In Davis v.

Stith v. Barnwell

447 F. Supp. 970 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 31, 1978

In Brown v. … Under the Brown decision, § 2000e-16 is the plaintiff’s exclusive remedy, and, therefore, the defendant’s motion to dismiss will be granted. 1 .

Bobby P. Kearney, MD, PLLC v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield Northcarolina

376 F. Supp. 3d 618 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 26, 2019

See also Brown v. Sikora & Assocs., Inc. , 311 F. … Recovery, Inc. , 813 F.3d at 1339 ; Brown , 311 F. App'x at 570 .

Tippett v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Company

316 F. Supp. 292 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 24, 1970

Vaca v. Sipes, supra. … (b) In De Arroyo v.

Armstrong v. City of Greensboro

190 F. Supp. 3d 450 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jun 6, 2016

Lytle v. … Pembaur v.

Action NC v. Strach

216 F. Supp. 3d 597 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Oct 27, 2016

Brown, 716 F.3d 342, 350 (4th Cir. 2013). A dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) is appropriate only when the complaint “lacks a cognizable legal theory or sufficient facts to support a cognizable legal theory.” Mendiondo v. … V.

SINGH v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL

District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 2, 2023

Miller v. Brown, 462 F.3d 312, 318–19 (4th Cir. 2006) (quoting Rescue Army v. Mun. Court of L.A., 331 U.S. 549, 584 (1947)). The plaintiff bears the burden of proving ripeness. … Randall v. United States, 30 F.3d 518, 522 (4th Cir. 1994); see also Brown v. Med. Coll. of Ohio, 79 F. Supp. 2d 840, 846 (N.D.

American Woodworking MacHinery & Equipment Show, Inc. v. United States

249 F. Supp. 392 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 20, 1966

The affairs of the corporation shall be managed by a Board of Directors. … Evanston-North Shore Board of Realtors v. United States, Ct.Cl., 320 F.2d 375 (1963), cert. den. 376 U.S. 931 , 84 S.Ct. 700 , 11 L.Ed.2d 650 (1964). It is stated in United States v.

Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. v. Local 391, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America

375 F. Supp. 1254 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Apr 5, 1974

(Board). … (This determination by the Board is the one for which the court in Boire v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, etc., infra, issued an injunction.) .

Thomas v. Northern Telecom, Inc.

157 F. Supp. 2d 627 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Oct 11, 2000

Plaintiff further alleges that, although her target volume of boards per day was later reduced, Defendant continued to insist that she label more computer boards than any of her co-workers. … V.