Case law

NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE v. THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS

District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 4, 2020

CGM, LLC v. BellSouth Telecomms., Inc., 664 F.3d 46, 52 (4th Cir. 2011) (quoting Miller v. Brown, 462 F.3d 312, 316 (4th Cir. 2006)). … Mazurek v. Armstrong, 520 U.S. 968, 972 (1997); see also MicroStrategy Inc. v.

Glosson Motor Lines, Inc. v. United States

271 F. Supp. 467 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 27, 1967

State of North Carolina v. United States, 210 F.Supp. 675 (D.C. 1962). … In dealing with a similar problem, the court, in Cope v.

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. J.P. Stevens & Co.

740 F. Supp. 1135 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 5, 1990

Ansonia Board of Education v. Philbrook, 479 U.S. 60, 65 , 107 S.Ct. 367, 370 , 93 L.Ed.2d 305 (1986). … The defendant relies heavily on the United States Supreme Court decision of Ansonia Board of Education v.

City-Wide Asphalt Paving, Inc. v. Alamance County

966 F. Supp. 395 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 25, 1997

See Bhatti v. Buckland, 328 N.C. 240 , 400 S.E.2d 440 (1991). On January 3, 1994, the Board awarded the landfill contract to Mace by a vote of four-to-one. … Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

Vermeulen v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund

490 F. Supp. 234 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · May 15, 1980

Knauss v. Gorman, 583 F.2d 82 (3d Cir. 1978); Reiherzer v. Shannon, 581 F.2d 1266 (7th Cir. 1978); Wilson v. Board of Trustees, 564 F.2d 1299 (9th Cir. 1977). … Burroughs v. Board of Trustees, 542 F.2d 1128 , 1131 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1096 , 97 S.Ct. 1113 , 51 L.Ed.2d 543 (1977); accord, Sailer v.

CARVER v. VALLIERE

District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Dec 4, 2019

Defendant Brown is currently an Assistant Superintendent IV at Piedmont, and during all relevant times served in that capacity or as a Correctional Captain. (Affidavit od Catherine Brown ¶¶ 3-4, Docket Entry 41-2.) … However, on September 26, 2014, NCDPS issued a policy, effective October 6, 2014, requiring all provision of methadone to outpatients to be approved by the Utilization Review Board (hereinafter “URB”). (Ex.

Eubanks v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

336 F. Supp. 2d 521 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Sep 2, 2004

Aetna Health Inc. v. … Co. v.

Aghnides v. Meyer's Co.

117 F. Supp. 839 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 21, 1954

City of Grafton v. Otis Elevator Co., 4 Cir., 166 F.2d 816 -821. Both patents in suit were allowed only after a hearing and demonstration before the Board of Appeals. … Co. v. Sales Affiliates, 4 Cir., 164 F.2d 260 -264. The prior art cited by' defendant was rejected by the Examiner or the Board of Appeals. The Solomon British patent is a counterpart of the Haismon British patent.

Price v. United States

469 F. Supp. 754 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 2, 1978

In Rybacki v. … In Smith v.

Uzzell v. Friday

618 F. Supp. 1222 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Sep 27, 1985

Vaughns v. Board of Education of Prince George’s County, 770 F.2d 1244 (4th Cir.1985), aff'g 598 F.Supp. 1262 (D.Md.1984); Murray v. Weinberger, 741 F.2d at 1430-32 ; Craik v. … Wheeler v. Durham City Board of Education, 585 F.2d 618 , 623 n. 7 (4th Cir.1978); see also Vaughns v. Board of Education of Prince George’s County, 598 F.Supp. at 1289-90 .

Pegram v. Nelson

469 F. Supp. 1134 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Apr 13, 1979

See Graham v. Board of Education, Idabel School District Number Five, 419 F.Supp. 1214 (E.D.Okla.1976); Coffman v. Kuehler, 409 F.Supp. 546 (N.D.Tex.1976). … See Graham v. Board of Education, Idabel School District Number Five, 419 F.Supp. 1214, 1220-21 (E.D.Okla.1976). Cf. Webster v. Perry, 367 F.Supp. 666, 668 (M.D.N.C. 1973), aff’d, 512 F.2d 612 , 614 (4th Cir. 1975).

McCoy Lumber Industries, Inc. v. Niedermeyer-Martin Co.

356 F. Supp. 1221 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 1, 1973

A total of 168,490 board feet of maple was shipped to the defendant by the plaintiff at the invoice amount of $124,728.12; and a total of 107,134 board feet of pine was shipped at a cost of $34,818.56. … In Putnam v.

Washington Mills Co. v. Schauffler

18 F. Supp. 397 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 28, 1937

Co. v. … Lind et al., decided November 9, 1936, by United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, reported in 86 F.(2d) 862 ; Bradley Lumber Co. v. Labor Board (C.C.A.) 84 F.(2d) 97 ; Bemis Brothers Bag Co. v.

Volumetrics Medical Imaging, Inc. v. ATL Ultrasound, Inc.

243 F. Supp. 2d 386 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 29, 2003

the VMI Board of Directors to negotiate a deal with ATL. … Corp. v.

Deloach v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.

229 F.R.D. 517 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 4, 2005

Pursuant to § 2.3, the court awarded $70,821,329.48 in attorneys’ fees. 4 Deloach v. Philip Morris Companies, No. 1:00CV01235, 2003 WL 23094907 at *11 (M.D.N.C. … In 2004, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation merged with R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company.

Rivera v. Guilford County

286 F. Supp. 2d 635 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Sep 29, 2003

Adams v. Bain, 697 F.2d 1213, 1219 (4th Cir.1982). … In Keller v.

Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen v. Southern Railway Co.

254 F. Supp. 569 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · May 25, 1966

The province of the Court in actions to enforce awards by the National Railroad Adjustment Board is clearly defined in the recent case of Gunther v. San Diego *572 & A. E. R. … Co. v. Brotherhood of Ry., Etc., 4 Cir., 210 F.2d 812 (1954). The case of Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Denver & R. G. W. R.

Castillo v. Perritt

142 F. Supp. 3d 415 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Oct 30, 2015

Rosa-Ortiz, 348 F.3d 33, 36 (1st Cir.2003), United States v. Browne, 505 F.3d 1229 , 1271 n. 31 (11th Cir.2007), and Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(b)(3)(B). (Doc. 12 at 1-2.) … See Gatewood, 173 F.3d at 986 ; Vreeken, 803 F.2d at 1088 ; Rosa-Ortiz, 348 F.3d at 36 ; Browne, 505 F.3d at 1271 n. 31; Fed. R.Crim.P. 12(b)(3)(B).

Hooper v. North Carolina

379 F. Supp. 2d 804 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Apr 13, 2005

Dai appealed the grievance committee’s decision to the university chancellor, then to the university’s board of trustees, and finally to the Board of Governors. … But see Dai, 2003 WL 22113444 , at *2 (plaintiff appealed chancellor’s decision to the University’s Board of Trustees and then to the Board of Governors).

Joyner v. Whiting

341 F. Supp. 1244 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Apr 7, 1972

See Swann v. CharlotteMecklenburg County Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1 , 91 S.Ct. 1267 , 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971); Green v. School Board of New Kent County, 391 U.S. 430 , 88 S.Ct. 1689 , 20 L.Ed.2d 716 (1968). … See Zucker v. Panitz, 299 F.Supp. 102 (S.D.N.Y.1969); Sullivan v. Houston Independent School District, 307 F.Supp. 1328 (S.D.Texas 1969); Eisner v. Stamford Board of Education, 440 F.2d 803 (2nd Cir. 1971); Trujillo v.