Case law

Fracaro v. Priddy

514 F. Supp. 191 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · May 1, 1981

Priddy’s perception of the Board’s authority, and the Board members’ perception of the Board’s authority do not alter the fact that the Board had no authority to dismiss Mrs. Fracaro. See Hall v. … Williams v. Board of Regents of the University System, 629 F.2d 993 (5th Cir. 1980).

Rakestraw v. Winchester

254 F. Supp. 729 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · May 16, 1966

(Ex. 1, on Rehearing before Review Board.) (Emphasis supplied.) … As was indicated in Freeman v. Brown et al., supra, and Fulford v.

North Carolina State Conference, of the NAACP v. McCrory

156 F. Supp. 3d 683 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 15, 2016

Although decided on § 2 grounds, Frank v. … See Ohio State Conference of N.A.A.C.P. v.

Williams v. United Steel Workers of America

234 F. Supp. 2d 542 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Oct 31, 2002

In Sheet Metal Workers’ Int'l Ass’n v. … In Sheet Metal Workers’ Int'l Ass’n v.

Simkins v. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital

211 F. Supp. 628 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Dec 5, 1962

In Eaton v. … Board of Trustees of Vincennes University v. State of Indiana, 55 U.S. (14 How.) 268 , 14 L.Ed. 416 (1852).

Stuart v. Loomis

992 F. Supp. 2d 585 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 17, 2014

Brown , — U.S. at -, 131 S.Ct. at 2741 n. 9. … Brown v. Entm’t Merchs.

United States v. Alston

717 F. Supp. 378 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · May 9, 1989

United States v. $48,231 in United States Currency, No. C-87-782G, slip op. at 7 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 14, 1988) (Sharp, Mag.); City of San Jose v. … V.

Jones v. Penny

387 F. Supp. 383 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Dec 23, 1974

Humphrey v. … In Jackson v.

Young v. EDGCOMB STEEL COMPANY

363 F. Supp. 961 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Sep 7, 1973

The Fourth Circuit, in Brown v. Gas-ton County Dyeing Machine Co., 457 F.2d 1377 (4th Cir. 1972) made findings similar to Rowe . … See Brown v. Gaston Co. Dyeing Machine Co., supra. Still, there are certain areas where past practices, and the potential for future discrimination, require the Court to grant some injunctive relief now.

Hairston v. McLean Trucking Co.

62 F.R.D. 642 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 20, 1972

See Judge Dupree’s separate opinion in Brown v. … Brown v. Gaston County Dyeing Machine Company, 457 F.2d 1377, 1387 (4th Cir. 1972) — (Judge Dupree, concurring in part, dissenting in part) ; Caldwell v. National Brewing Company, supra. .

Pippen v. Scales

822 F. Supp. 305 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · May 17, 1993

Hoke v. Board of Medical Examiners, 445 F.Supp. 1313, 1314 (W.D.N.C.1978). … (quoting Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972)).

McDonald Bros., Inc. v. Tinder Wholesale, LLC

395 F. Supp. 2d 255 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Apr 6, 2005

R.Civ.P. 56(f); see also Gay v. … See, e.g., Lescs v. Dow Chem.

Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

495 F. Supp. 619 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 23, 1980

See Sheraton-Kauai v. NLRB, 429 F.2d 1352 . Lastly, the Board’s decision was final. IBT could have challenged the Board’s ruling by refusing to comply. … L. v. NLRB, 308 U.S. 401 , 60 S.Ct. 300 , 84 L.Ed. 347 (1940). IBT chose not to challenge the Board’s decision, however. Its acquiescence rendered the Board’s § 9 proceeding and ruling final and binding. McGuire v.

Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Edelman

666 F. Supp. 799 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 30, 1987

In Pargas, Inc. v. … Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 320 , 82 S.Ct. 1502, 1521 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962).

Cloak v. Cody

326 F. Supp. 391 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · May 12, 1971

Article V: Amendments are to be passed by 90% of total club membership. … It was only after it became a commercial venture that the board acted. In Breard v.

HOELZER v. THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA

District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 31, 2022

Brown, 716 F.3d 342, 350 (4th Cir. 2013), and a court “need not accept as true unwarranted inferences, unreasonable conclusions, or arguments,” Vitol, 708 F.3d at 548 (quoting Jordan v. Alt. Res. … Wilson v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 525 F.3d 370, 376 (4th Cir. 2008).

Durham Merchant's Ass'n v. United States

34 F. Supp. 71 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 9, 1940

Tennessee v. Whitworth, 117 U.S. 139 , 6 S.Ct. 649 , 29 L.Ed. 833 ; Yazoo & M. V. Railroad Co. v. Thomas, 132 U.S. 174 , 10 S.Ct. 68 , 33 L.Ed. 302 . … Treasury Regulations, 77, promulgated, under the Revenue Act of 1932: Article 528: Business leagues, chambers of commerce, real estate boards, and boards of trade.

Blue v. Durham Public School Dist.

95 F. Supp. 441 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 26, 1951

Coggins v. Board of Education, 223 N.C. 763 , 28 S.E.2d 527 ; Bridges v. Charlotte, 221 N.C. 472 , 20 S.E.2d 825 ; Atkins v. McAden, 229 N.C. 752 , 51 S.E.2d 484 . … County School Board of Pulaski County, 177 F.2d 924 , involving high and elementary schools, and Judge Soper in Carter v. School Board of Arlington County, Va., 182 F.2d 531, 534 , involving high school facilities.

United States v. Cassidy

532 F. Supp. 613 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Feb 5, 1982

As the Supreme Court notes in Marron v. … In Andresen v.

Pinehurst Enterprises, Inc. v. Town of Southern Pines

690 F. Supp. 444 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jun 24, 1988

On the other hand, defendants assert the “state action exemption” established in Parker v. Brown 1 as a defense to federal antitrust liability. … In Casey v.