Case law

Harris v. McCrory

159 F. Supp. 3d 600 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Feb 5, 2016

Citizens v. … See Stephenson v.

Quorum Health Resources, LLC v. Hugh Chatham Memorial Hospital, Inc.

552 F. Supp. 2d 527 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 29, 2007

Upon receipt of the letter, Defendant’s Board of Trustees met and considered the matter. … See, e.g., Brown v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 326 N.C. 387, 393 , 390 S.E.2d 150, 153 (1990).

Norkunas v. NC Hotel Associates Ltd.

851 F. Supp. 2d 958 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jun 6, 2011

Brown’s connection to or role with the named Defendant. … Brown is a general manager of NC Hotel Associates Ltd., there has not been sufficient proof of service. See Tietex Interiors v. Am. Furniture Mfg., 1:06-CV-503, 2008 WL 906318 , 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26809 (M.D.N.C.

Cole v. Champion Enterprises, Inc.

496 F. Supp. 2d 613 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 23, 2007

There is no evidence that the Board approved of retaining Cole as a limited employee for a definite term. See also Braun v. … Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc., 429 U.S. 477, 488 , 97 S.Ct. 690 , 50 L.Ed.2d 701 (1977) (quoting Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 320 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962)).

George v. McClure

245 F. Supp. 2d 735 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Feb 10, 2003

I, L.P. v. Andrews Co., Inc., 128 N.C.App. 716, 720 , 496 S.E.2d 607, 610 (1998) (Caswell II); see also Kenny v. … I, L.P. v.

FOX v. CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO CITY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION

District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 31, 2025

See Henderson v. … V.

Deering-Milliken, Inc. v. Johnston

193 F. Supp. 741 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Apr 28, 1961

The action of the Board in said ease has been unreasonably delayed. … The Board’s order of February 15, 1961, in said case is void and beyond the powers of the Board, and constitutes unlawful action on the part of the Board which has worked and is working an injury to plaintiff. 5.

R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Philip Morris Inc.

199 F. Supp. 2d 362 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · May 1, 2002

NCAA v. Board of Regents of the Univ. of Okla., 468 U.S. 85 , 109 n. 38, 104 S.Ct. 2948 , 82 L.Ed.2d 70 (1984). … See Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962).

United States v. Cauthen

669 F. Supp. 2d 629 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 10, 2009

Cobbler v. … Accord United States v.

George v. McClure

266 F. Supp. 2d 413 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jun 5, 2001

Cunningham v. Brown, 51 N.C.App. 264, 270 , 276 S.E.2d 718, 724 (1981). Further, “a release is subject to avoidance by a showing that its execution resulted from fraud or mutual mistake.” Sykes v. … Keiltex Indus., Inc., 123 N.C.App. 482, 485 , 473 S.E.2d 341, 344 (1996) (citing Cunningham v. Brown, 51 N.CApp. at 269, 276 S.E.2d at 723 ).

Bond v. Potter

348 F. Supp. 2d 525 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 30, 2004

Hill v. John Chezik Imports, 869 F.2d 1122, 1124 (8th Cir.1989) (citing Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147 , 148 n. 1, 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984)). No such circumstances exist here. … Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 835, 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). 3 . A limitations defense may be raised in a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. See Williams v. Enter.

Epps v. Carmichael

93 F. Supp. 327 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Oct 9, 1950

Painter, 339 U.S. 629 , 70 S.Ct. 848 , the Oklahoma case, Sipuel v. Board of Regents, 332 U.S. 631 , 68 S.Ct. 299 , 92 L.Ed. 247 or the Missouri case, State of Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. … Johnson v. Board of Education, 166 N.C. 468 , 82 S.E. 832 , L.R.A.1915A, 828. Moreover, marriages between white persons and Negroes are prohibited by Article 14, Section 8.

Young v. AAA Realty Co. of Greensboro, Inc.

350 F. Supp. 1382 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 9, 1972

Brown v. Lo Duca, 307 F.Supp. 102 (E.D.Wis.1969); Johnson v. Decker, 333 F.Supp. 88 (N.D.Cal.1971); Crim v. Glover, 338 F.Supp. 823 (S.D.Ohio 1972). … Likewise, the Court finds Brown v. Ballas, supra, unpersuasive. The Brown case, as the instant case, involved alleged racial discrimination by a lessor against a prospective black lessee.

ATI Industrial Automation, Inc. v. Applied Robotics, Inc.

801 F. Supp. 2d 419 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 12, 2011

Thereafter, ATI filed Exhibits 4, 28-29, 34, and 38-40 to the Annis Deposition, Exhibits E-N, U-V and X to the Board-man Affidavit, and the Boardman Affidavit, in an unredacted form, under seal. … Valley Broadcasting v. United, States District Court, 798 F.2d 1289 , 1294 (9th Cir.1986); In re Iowa Freedom of Information Council, 724 F.2d 658 (8th Cir.1983); Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co. v.

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Philip Morris Inc.

60 F. Supp. 2d 502 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 12, 1999

See Direx Israel, Ltd. v. Breakthrough Med. Corp., 952 F.2d 802, 811 (4th Cir.1991). In Blackwelder Furniture Co. of Statesville, Inc. v. Seilig Mfg. … See, e.g., Philip Morris Inc. v.

Crest Street Community Council, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Transportation

598 F. Supp. 258 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 29, 1984

Board of Education, 715 F.2d at 258; Latino Project, Inc. v. City of Camden, 701 F.2d at 264 ; Blow v. Lascaris, 668 F.2d at 671 . … The other two, Ciechon v. City of Chicago, 686 F.2d 511 (7th Cir. 1982) and Brown v.

Q.C. v. WINSTON-SALEM/FORSYTH COUNTY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION

District Court, M.D. North Carolina · May 26, 2022

Alexander v. Choate, 469 U.S. 287, 295 (1985). … Contractors of Am. v.

Uzzell v. Friday

592 F. Supp. 1502 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 23, 1984

In that year, this court, building on then recent precedent, Brown v. … (court implicitly recognizes prejudice to other parties caused by untimeliness of certification motion as grounds for denial of certification but finds no prejudice occurred); Brown v. J.P.

MITCHELL v. WINSTON SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY

District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 30, 2020

Defendant Ivey Brown is General Counsel for WSSU. (Id. ¶ 5.) Defendants Robinson, Berry, and Brown (together, “Individual Defendants”) are all employed by WSSU. … Also on August 10, Plaintiff’s counsel questioned Defendant Brown “as to whether he advised the Board of Trustees during the deliberations,” to which Defendant Brown responded, “

United States v. Brooks

221 F. Supp. 852 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Sep 20, 1963

Mills v. United States, 4 Cir., 281 F.2d 736 (1960). … Under these circumstances, the defendant’s motion for a new trial must be denied upon authority of United States v. Johnson, 327 U.S. 106 , 66 S.Ct. 464 , 90 L.Ed. 562 (1946); Jones v.