Case law

Morpul, Inc. v. Glen Raven Knitting Mill, Inc.

238 F. Supp. 520 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Feb 11, 1965

McCoy, Inc. v. Schuster, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 44 F.Supp. 499 ; Brown v. Ford Motor Co., D.C.E.D.Mich., 57 F.Supp. 825 ; Juniper Mills, Inc. v. J. W. Landenberger & Co., D.C.E.D.Pa., 6 F.R.D. 463 .” In Friedlander v. … From the adverse decision of the Examiner, the applicant appealed to the Patent Office Board of Appeals, which Board sustained the decision of the Examiner, and the Board adopted the reasoning of the Examiner as their reasons

G.D. v. KANNAPOLIS CITY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION

District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 9, 2023

v. Nicke, 168 F.R.D. 542, 543 (M.D.N.C. 1996); see also Powell v. … P. 17(b)(1); accord Hudnall v.

Gulf & Western Industries, Inc. v. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.

633 F. Supp. 688 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Apr 29, 1986

American Synthetic Rubber Corp. v. Louisville & N.R. Co., 422 F.2d 462, 465 (6th Cir.1970), quoting Adams Express Co. v. Croninger, 226 U.S. 491 , 33 S.Ct. 148 , 57 L.Ed. 314 (1913). … Plaintiff seeks to avoid this result by styling its action as one for negligence not based on the Schenkers-Old Dominion or Brown contracts. The Supreme Court’s decision in Great Northern Railway Co. v.

Delaney v. Bartlett

370 F. Supp. 2d 373 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 26, 2004

Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 737 , 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974). … See Childrey v.

Russell v. American Tobacco Company

374 F. Supp. 286 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 18, 1973

Plaintiffs rely heavily on Brown v. Gaston County Dyeing Machine Co., 457 F.2d 1377 (4th Cir. 1972), and Rowe v. General Motors Corp., 457 F.2d 348 (5th Cir. 1972). … Brown, supra, at 1382.

Fulk v. Bagley

88 F.R.D. 153 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Sep 2, 1980

Gordon, 467 F.2d 602 (2d Cir. 1972); Clark v. Cameron-Brown Co., 72 F.R.D. 48 (M.D.N.C.1976). See also 5 C. Wright and A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure, Civil § 1296 (1969). … Cameron — Brown, supra at 61 . To require greater specificity would undermine the pleading theory embraced by Rule 8. A more complete statement of this view may be found in Poller v.

G.D. v. KANNAPOLIS CITY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION

District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 16, 2023

P. 17(b) (1); accord Hudnall v. … v.

G.D. v. KANNAPOLIS CITY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION

District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Apr 27, 2023

The Board relies on a Seventh Circuit case, Doc. 33 at 17–18 (citing C.S. v. Madison Metro. Sch. … The cases cited by the Board are distinguishable. Pahssen v.

MATHIS v. CASWELL COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF EDUCATION

District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 17, 2022

Paul v. … Meyer v. Walls, 489 S.E.2d 880, 888 (N.C. 1997). School board members, superintendents, and school principals are all “public officials” who may be entitled to public official immunity. See, e.g., Webb v.

MATHIS v. CASWELL COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF EDUCATION

District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 23, 2021

Gallimore v. Henrico Cnty. Sch. Bd., 38 F. Supp. 3d 721, 726 (E.D. Va. 2014) (quoting Brown v. … As such, the School Board’s motion with respect to Count III of the Amended Complaint will be denied. V.

PETERSON v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS

District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Dec 29, 2020

(“DCBE”), and the North Carolina State Board of Elections (“NCSBE”) (collectively “Defendants”). … See Clingman v.

SCIACCA v. THE DURHAM COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION

District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Dec 18, 2020

Wilson v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 525 F.3d 370, 376 (4th Cir. 2008). … Board liable.

K.I. v. DURHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION

District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jun 29, 2020

The Court’s reading of the statute’s requirements is supported by the Fourth Circuit’s treatment of the same statute in E.L. v. Chapel Hill-Carrboro Board of Education. … Learning Disabilities Ass’n of Md., Inc. v. Board of Educ. of Balt. Cty., 837 F. Supp. 717, 723 (D. Md. 1993).

N.C. Democratic Party v. Berger

306 F. Supp. 3d 803 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 31, 2018

Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724 , 730, 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974). The Constitution grants broad powers to the states to prescribe the time, place, and manner of elections for state offices. … For example, in New York State Board of Elections v.

WISE v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS

District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Oct 3, 2020

In Wise v. North Carolina State Board of Elections, No. 5:20-cv-505-D (E.D.N.C.) … The court also TRANSFERS this action and Wise v. North Carolina State Board of Elections, No. 5:20-CV-505 (E.D.N.C.), to the Honorable William L.

Farmer v. Secretary of Commerce

923 F. Supp. 770 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 2, 1996

Henson v. Liggett Group, Inc., 61 F.3d 270, 274 (4th Cir.1995) (quoting EEOC v. Clay Printing Co., 955 F.2d 936, 940 (4th Cir.1992)). See Fuller v. Phipps, 67 F.3d 1137, 1144 (4th Cir.1995). … See Douglas v. PHH FleetAmerica Corp., 832 F.Supp. 1002, 1009-10 (D.Md.1993). See also Smith v.

DiPaulo v. Potter

570 F. Supp. 2d 802 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 29, 2008

See, e.g., Patterson v. Brown, No. 3:06cv476, 2008 WL 219965 , *13-14 (W.D.N.C. … Steele v. Brown, 993 F.Supp. 918, 921-22 (M.D.N.C.1998). 16 .

Harris v. McCrory

159 F. Supp. 3d 600 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Feb 5, 2016

Citizens v. … See Stephenson v.

Parsons v. Jefferson-Pilot Corp.

141 F.R.D. 408 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Feb 14, 1992

Liggett Group, Inc. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 116 F.R.D. 205, 210 (M.D.N.C.1986). … BNS v. Koppers (business strategy privilege held to expire as soon as the Koppers board formally acted on the tender offer).

Quorum Health Resources, LLC v. Hugh Chatham Memorial Hospital, Inc.

552 F. Supp. 2d 527 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 29, 2007

Upon receipt of the letter, Defendant’s Board of Trustees met and considered the matter. … See, e.g., Brown v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 326 N.C. 387, 393 , 390 S.E.2d 150, 153 (1990).