Case law

Stevens v. Town of Snow Hill, NC

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 8, 2021

Rather, the Board cut off her speech because her speech did not relate to steps for preserving the building, and the Board had the prerogative to stop Stevens to maintain an orderly meeting. Cf. … Stevens merely asserts that in 1999 following Hurricane Floyd, the Greene County Board of Education gave her the building. See Compl. at 5.

Yarborough v. Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc.

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 12, 2024

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … Welcome Ctr. v.

Am. Ass'n of Political Consultants v. Sessions

323 F. Supp. 3d 737 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 24, 2018

Gomez v. … Carey v. Brown , 447 U.S. 455 , 471, 100 S.Ct. 2286 , 65 L.Ed.2d 263 (1980) ; see Gallion , 287 F.Supp.3d at 927 . "One important aspect of residential privacy is protection of the unwilling listener....

Moir v. Andrew

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 29, 2020

Plaintiffs are the sons of Tia and Ronald Brown Moir Sr., to whom Tia was married from 1951 until Ronald Brown Moir Sr.’s death in 1982. Tia married her second husband, David Edward Waldron Andrew (“Mr. … Id.; see Common Cause v.

Smith v. Hill

285 F. Supp. 556 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 11, 1968

Its “chilling effect” (Dombrowski v. … Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967).

Espin v. Citibank, N.A.

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 29, 2023

Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U.S. 117, 127 (2014) (quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011)). … Steele v. W. Union Tel. Co., 206 N.C. 220 (1934).

First Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Camp

281 F. Supp. 786 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 18, 1968

[National] Labor [Relations] Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co., 306 U.S. 292, 300 [ 59 S.Ct. 501, 505 , 83 L.Ed. 660 ] (1939).” Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. … Thomas v. Celebrezze, 4 Cir., 331 F.2d 541 (1964).

At & T Communications of Southern States, Inc. v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.

7 F. Supp. 2d 661 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 22, 1998

AT & T alleges that certain terms of the Agreement are inconsistent with §§ 251 and 252 of the Act, with the ruling of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in Iowa Utilities Board v. … FCC, 120 F.3d 753 (8th Cir.1997) petition for cert, granted, AT & T v. Iowa Utilities Board, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 879 , 139 L.Ed.2d 867 (1998), and with regulations issued by the Federal Communications Commission.

Bray v. Tenax Corp.

905 F. Supp. 324 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 3, 1995

Indeed, plaintiff admitted placing a single call to the EEOC upon the suggestion of “the Labor Board,” and being so unimpressed by the response to her inquiry that she told the EEOC not to bother. … See Dwyer v. Smith, 867 F.2d 184, 194 (4th Cir.1989).

Rodger v. Electronic Data Systems, Corp.

155 F.R.D. 537 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 13, 1994

See McClain v. Mack Trucks, Inc., 85 F.R.D. 53, 63 (E.D.Pa. 1979); Robbins v. Camden City Board of Education, 105 F.R.D. 49, 63 (D.N.J.1985). … Mack v.

United States ex rel. Norfolk Southern Railroad v. D. L. Taylor Co.

268 F. 635 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 25, 1920

There were no hotels or boarding houses; and the contractor ‘was compelled to provide board and lodging for its laborers.’ ” Supplies were furnished by plaintiff for the laborers and used by them while engaged in the prosecution … Christmas v. Russell, 14 Wall. 69 , 20 L. Ed. 762 . In United States Fidelity Co. v. United States, 189 Fed. 339 , 111 C. C. A. 71 , reported in United States Fidelity Co. v. Bartlett, 231 U. S. 237 , 34 Sup.

Marlen C. Robb & Son Boatyard & Marina, Inc. v. the Vessel Bristol

893 F. Supp. 526 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 8, 1994

Carrington also left on board the BRISTOL a handwritten note directed to Mr. … Co. v.

Marden's Ark Corporation v. Bodenhamer

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 8, 2021

Mylan Labs., Inc. v. Matkari, 7 F.3d 1130, 1134 (4th Cir.1993). … Brown v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC, No. 8:18-CV-136-T-60AEP, 2019 WL 4221718, at *5 (M.D. Fla. Sept. 5, 2019).

Foushee v. R.T. Vanderbilt Holding Company, Inc.

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 17, 2020

Compare Haislip v. … Compare Reichard Dep. at 62:9-23, 65:9-24 (50-pound brown bags) with B. McCarthy Dep. at 15:23-16:10 (50-pound bags); G. McCarthy Dep. at 34:5-24 (50-pound bags); DE-108-14 at 4, 7 (50-pound brown paper bags).

Davis v. Ratledge

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 22, 2025

See, e.g., Zinkand v. Brown, 478 F.3d 634, 637 (4th Cir. 2007); Bogart, 396 F.3d at 555. … Williams v. Reed, February 21, 2025. The United States Supreme Court explicitly clarified in Williams v.

Banks

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 28, 2026

Servs., 753 F.2d 1281, 1285 (4th Cir. 1985) (“Under Title VII and either § 1981 or § 1983, the elements of the required prima facie case are the same.”): see also Brown v. Bratton. No. … Evans v. B.F. Perkins Co.. 166 F.3d 642. 647 n.3 (4th Cir. 1999): Grayson v. Anderson, 816 F.3d 262, 268-69 (4th Cir. 2016).

Harris v. State of North Carolina

240 F. Supp. 985 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 28, 1965

It is a fact that any member of the County Board of Commissioners was eligible to purge the list and anyone from the jury list on their own volition. There is no evidence that any member actually did so however. … Davis v.

Mclean v. Raleigh Police Department

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 27, 2025

See Younger v. … See, e.g., Moore v.

Bateman v. Perdue

881 F. Supp. 2d 709 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 29, 2012

See Schenck v. … See Brockett v.

Williams-Grogans v. Dejoy

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 5, 2023

See Brown v. Henderson, 6 F. App’x 155, 156 (4th Cir. 2001); see also Henrickson v. Potter, 327 F.3d 444, 447 (5th Cir. 2003). … See Goines v. Valley Cmty. Servs. Bd., 822 F.3d 159, 167 (4th Cir. 2016).