Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnced

1,493 results

1.92s

  • Witham v. Boyle

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 8, 2020

    (Mem., DE # 19, at 2); see generally Trent Brown, Raleigh federal building has been sending sewage into waterways for years, report says, Raleigh News & Observer (June 3, 2020 5:43 PM), https://www.newsobserver.com/news … See Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349, 355-57 (1978); Hamilton v. Murray, 648 F. App’x 344, 345 (4th Cir. 2016) (citing McCray v. Maryland, 456 F.2d 1, 5 (4th Cir. 1972)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hall v. Liles

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 20, 2023

    See Everett v. Pitt County Board of Education, No. 6:69-cv-702-H (E.D.N.C. filed Nov. 12, 1969). … On September 4, 2013, KCA’s board of directors held an emergency meeting and voted to surrender the school’s charter.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Faix v. Moen, Inc.

    935 F. Supp. 726 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 8, 1996

    Regarding the cosmetic review board: “[Plaintiff] has treated this whole effort with disinterest and disdain from the beginning.” … V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Lang

    251 F. Supp. 3d 971 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 21, 2017

    Wilson v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 525 F.3d 370, 379 (4th Cir. 2008) (citation omitted). … Kelly v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Raleigh

    48 F. Supp. 2d 505 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 30, 1999

    Rayburn v. … Kestler v. Board of Trustees of North Carolina Local Governmental Employees’ Retirement System, 48 F.3d 800, 804 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 868 , 116 S.Ct. 186 , 133 L.Ed.2d 124 (1995).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Hoffman v. United States

    862 F. Supp. 1431 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 13, 1994

    This stop was very busy, with twenty to thirty people coming on board in thirty minutes’ time. Approximately eighty percent were children. … Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Iglesias v. Wolford

    667 F. Supp. 2d 573 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 28, 2009

    See, e.g., Campbell v. Towse, 99 F.3d 820, 828 (7th Cir.1996); Cromer v. Brown, 88 F.3d 1315, 1330 (4th Cir.1996). … Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997) (“We have consistently refused to hold municipalities liable under a theory of respondeat superior.”).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Lee v. Argent Trust Company

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 25, 2019

    See Bogart v. Chappell, 396 F.3d 548, 555 (4th Cir. 2005) (citing Pac. Ins. Co. v. Am. Nat'l Fire Ins. Co., 148 F.3d 396, 403 (4th Cir. 1996)). … Dowell v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Auto. Ins. Co., 993 F.2d 46, 48 (4th Cir. 1993) (internal quotation omitted).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Pratt v. United States Parole Commission

    717 F. Supp. 382 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 21, 1989

    Brown, 488 F.2d 94, 95 (5th Cir.1973) (per curiam); United States v. Hill, 447 F.2d 817, 819 (7th Cir.1971); United States ex rel. Sperling v. Fitzpatrick, 426 F.2d 1161, 1163 (2d Cir.1970). … In Minnesota v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Tyner v. Brunswick County Department of Social Services

    776 F. Supp. 2d 133 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 2, 2011

    Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur, 414 U.S. 632, 639-40 , 94 S.Ct. 791 , 39 L.Ed.2d 52 (1974). … (citing Kelson v. City of Springfield, 767 F.2d 651 (9th Cir.1985); Trujillo v. Board of County Comm’rs, 768 F.2d 1186 , 1189-90 (10th Cir.1985)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Currituck County, North Carolina v. LeTendre

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 12, 2020

    etter of determination to the Currituck County Board of Adjustment. The Board of Adjustment held that LeTendre’s plans depicted a home that satisfied the UDO’s definition of a single family . … LeTendre appealed the notice of violation to the Board of Adjustment, but no hearing has taken place.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Nieves v. Wormuth

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 3, 2023

    Inthe context of military boards, “decisions are subject to judicial review and can be set aside if they are arbitrary, capricious or not based on substantial evidence.” Chappell v. … Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 (1971) (quotation omitted). If the court finds that a military board acted arbitrarily or capriciously, it may remand for further proceedings.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • O'Connell v. Town of Burgaw

    262 F. Supp. 3d 316 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 13, 2017

    NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN OF ’BUR-GAW BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS THAT: I. … Ross v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Zhang v. O'Neal

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 7, 2025

    See, e.g., Zinkand v. Brown, 478 F.3d 634, 637 (4th Cir. 2007); Bogart, 396 F.3d at 555. “Thus, Rule 59(e), in essence, gives the district court a chance to correct its own mistake if it believes one has been made.” … Allen v. Cooper, 895 F.3d 337, 347 (4th Cir. 2018).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gray v. Laws

    915 F. Supp. 747 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 20, 1994

    Jurgensen v. Fairfax County, Virginia, 745 F.2d 868, 878 (4th Cir.1984) (citing Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 287 , 97 S.Ct. 568, 576 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977)). a. … Connick, 461 U.S. at 148 n. 7, 103 S.Ct. at 1690 n. 7; Huang v. Board of Governors of University of North Carolina, 902 F.2d 1134 , 1140 & n. 7 (4th Cir.1990).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Morris v. United States

    122 F. Supp. 155 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 25, 1954

    Another official or board of the Administration noted the report of an organic disease on plaintiff’s application and wrote for his service medical record. … Meadows v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Reaves v. Public Schools of Robeson County

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 26, 2023

    Orpiano v. Johnson, 687 F.2d 44, 47 (4th Cir. 1982). Absent a specific and timely filed objection, the court reviews only for “clear error,” and need not give any explanation for adopting the M&R. See Diamond v. … Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005); Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 200 (4th Cir.1983).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Grant

    341 F. Supp. 356 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 15, 1972

    In Environmental Defense Fund v. … In Environmental Defense Fund v.

    Cited 46 timesPublished
  • United States v. Atkinson

    429 F. Supp. 880 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 30, 1977

    S. v. Pennix, supra; U. S. v. Frazier, 418 F.2d 854 (4 Cir. 1969); U. S. v. Turner, 497 F.2d 406 (10 Cir. 1974); U. S. v. Allende, 486 F.2d 1351 (9 Cir. 1973); Johnson v. V. S., 424 F.2d 537 (9 Cir. 1970); Ciravolo v. … S. v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Bramham v. First Nat. Bank

    9 F. Supp. 979 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 21, 1934

    Pratt v. Chaffin, 136 N. C. 350 , 48 S. E. 768 ; Kelly v. Oliver, 113 N. C. 442 , 18 S. E. 698 ; Wilson v. Powers, 131 Mass. 539 ; Ware v. Allen, 128 U. S. 590 , 9 S. Ct. 174, 176 , 32 L. Ed. 563 . In Wilson v. … In Ware v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.