Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnced

1,493 results

0.36s

  • Colburn v. Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 24, 2020

    Co. v. … Kokoszka v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brody v. North Carolina

    557 F. Supp. 184 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 11, 1983

    Parden v. Terminal Railway Co., 377 U.S. 184 , 84 S.Ct. 1207 , 12 L.Ed.2d 233 (1964); Petty v. Tennessee-Missouri Commission, 359 U.S. 275 , 79 S.Ct. 785 , 3 L.Ed.2d 804 (1959); Ford Motor Co. v. … See In Re Holoholo, 512 F.Supp. 889, 899, 904 (D.Hawaii 1981); Huckins v. Board of Regents of the University of Michigan, 263 F.Supp. 622, 623 (E.D.Mich.1967); Cocherl v. Alaska, 246 F.Supp. 328, 330 (D.Alaska 1965).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Lee v. Certainteed Corp.

    123 F. Supp. 3d 780 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 16, 2015

    In 1983, the board of directors of JMAC created a California executive committee and empowered it to undertake and assume all powers authorized by law to manage and effectuate policy of the full Board of Directors to achieve … as director or for the purpose of being communicated by him to the board.”

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Baggett v. Keller

    796 F. Supp. 2d 718 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 1, 2011

    Harrington v. … Brown v. Angelone, 150 F.3d 370, 375 (4th Cir.1998); see 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (d)(1)(D).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Williamson v. Carolina Power and Light Co.

    754 F. Supp. 2d 787 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 29, 2010

    Id.; see also Johnson v. … Tatum v. Brown, 29 N.C.App. 504 , 224 S.E.2d 698 (N.C.Ct.App.1976). *794 Here, Plaintiff has not alleged that the company’s relevant policies and procedures were included in her employment contract.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States v. MacDonald

    32 F. Supp. 3d 608 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 24, 2014

    Browning. For his part, Browning was assigned to complete examination of the trace evidence. Aff. of Browning [DE-215] ¶4. … Aff. of Browning [DE-215] ¶ 8; Ex. 3 [DE-215-3]. Browning testified to this identification before the grand jury in 1974. Aff. of Browning [DE-215] ¶ 9; Ex. 4 [DE-215-4]'.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Nix v. The Chemours Company FC, LLC

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 30, 2024

    Mainstreet Collection, Inc. v. Kirkland’s, Inc., 270 F.R.D. 238, 241 (E.D.N.C. 2010). … The undersigned has addressed this issue in Cape Fear Public Utilities Authority v. The Chemours Co. FC, LLC, No. 7:17-CV-00195 (E.D.N.C. May 2, 2024).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Camden County v. Northeastern Community Development Corp.

    263 F. Supp. 3d 556 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 17, 2017

    I. ' In 2001 and 2002, the Camden County Board of Commissioners and Pasquotank County Board of Commissioners decided to facilitate the construction of a child care facility. Riggs Dep. [D.E. 43-1] 10-12; Griffin Dep. … P. 56; Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 378 , 127 S.Ct. 1769 , 167 L.Ed.2d 686 (2007); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 325-26 , 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); Anderson v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Oxford v. LINC GROUP, INC.

    724 F. Supp. 2d 570 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 30, 2010

    Brown v. Fred’s, Inc., 494 F.3d 736, 739-40 (8th Cir.2007) (holding parent company did not act as employer for Title VII purposes); Nesbit v. Gears Unlimited, Inc., 347 F.3d 72, 85-89 (3d Cir.2003) (same); Johnson v. … See Campbell v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • K. Hope, Inc. v. Onslow County

    911 F. Supp. 948 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 9, 1995

    The Planning Board then held a special meeting on the ordinance, Leary Affidavit, p. 3, ¶ 7; Exh. … Virginia Pharmacy Board v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc., 425 U.S. 748, 771 , 96 S.Ct. 1817, 1880 , 48 L.Ed.2d 346 (1976).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • York v. Lutz

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 17, 2023

    The Court finds that the Currituck County Board of Education is the proper defendant in this action. /M. v. Granville Cty. Sch., No. 5:22-CV-7-FL, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146572, at *17 (E.D.N.C. … App. 579, 587 (1994) (“plaintiff cannot maintain an action against the Board or Lassiter for malicious interference of contract because the Board and Lassiter, as superintendent of the Board, are parties to the contract

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Retirement Committee of DAK Americas LLC v. Smith

    185 F. Supp. 3d 707 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 9, 2016

    Brown, 478 F.3d 634, 637 (4th Cir.2007). … Corp. v. British-Am.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Sharpe

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 19, 2026

    See MDC Innovations, LLC v. Hall, 726 F. App’x 168, 172 (4th Cir. 2018) (citing Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. … For example, in United States v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gregory v. Harris

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 7, 2020

    Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court, 137 S. Ct. 1773, 1780 (2017) (quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011)). … In response, plaintiff submitted documents purporting to show that she “re-mailed” unspecified documents to Alan Steinbrecher, alleged Chair of the California Bar Board of Trustees. (DE # 39.)

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Oyeneyin v. Bracey

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 3, 2021

    See Bryant County Bd. of Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997). Plaintiff also has not alleged a failure to train or supervise, or persistent and widespread custom or usage. See Semple v. … City of Moundsville, 195 F.3d 708, 713 (4th Cir. 1999); Randall v. Prince George’s County, 302 F.3d 188, 210 (4th Cir. 2002).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Williams v. City of Raleigh

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 28, 2025

    Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403-405 (1997). … Brown, 520 U.S. at 410.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bendlin v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.

    449 F. Supp. 934 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 24, 1978

    While the case of Executive Jet Aviation v. … What was said by Judge Stuart in Clinton Board of Park Commissioners v. Claussen, 410 F.Supp. 320, 325 (S.D.Iowa 1976), seems peculiarly appropriate in Nelson’s case: “ . . .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Sharpe v. Winterville Police Department

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 20, 2020

    Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 (1997); Hafer, 502 U.S. at 25 (1991); Graham, 473 U.S. at 166; Monell, 436 U.S. 658, 690-94 (1978); King v. … See, e.g., Brown, 520 U.S. at 403.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Food Lion Effective Scheduling Litigation

    861 F. Supp. 1263 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 27, 1994

    These findings relate to: McLawhon, et al v. Food Lion, Inc. 91-133-CIV-M-F (E.D.N.C.) Wedmore, et al v. Food Lion, Inc. 92-555-CIV-5-F (E.D.N.C.) … Pforr v. Food Lion, Inc., 851 F.2d 106, 109 (4th Cir.1988).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Braswell v. Ellis

    950 F. Supp. 145 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 19, 1995

    Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. … Ristow v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.