Case law

Empire Trust Co. v. Egypt Ry. Co.

182 F. 100 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 3, 1910

Justice Clark reviewed the authorities, citing Railroad v. Brown, 84 U. S. 445 , 21 L. Ed. 675 ; Thomas’s Case, 101 U. S. 83 , 25 L. Ed. 950 . In Perry v. Railroad, 129 N. C. 333 , 40 S. E. 191 , Mr. … In Williard v. Spartanburg Railroad (C.

Alford v. Del Toro

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 11, 2021

“Under the Board’s procedures, one aggrieved . . . may request a hearing; if the claims are denied without a hearing, the Board is required to provide a statement of its reasons.” Chappell v. … “The function of the court is not to reweigh the evidence presented to the [Board].” Randall v. United States, 95 F.3d 339, 348 (4th Cir. 1996) (quotations omitted).

Dickey v. Greene

603 F. Supp. 102 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 19, 1984

At the time of suit, Baker was Chairman of the Head Start Policy Council and King was Chairman of the Board of Region P Human Development Agency, Inc. … In EEOC v.

First Financial Savings Bank, Inc. v. American Bankers Insurance of Florida, Inc.

783 F. Supp. 963 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 30, 1991

In support of its contention, the FDIC cites FSLIC v. Burdette, 718 F.Supp. 649 (E.D.Tenn.1989). This court finds that FSLIC v. Burdette is distinguishable from the case at bar. In FSLIC v. … See Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v.

Wright v. Bailey

228 F. Supp. 560 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 16, 1964

In Griffin v. … See Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477 , 83 S.Ct. 768 , 9 L.Ed.2d 892 (1963) ; Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 , 83 S.Ct. 814 , 9 L.Ed.2d 811 (1963); Draper v.

Medical Mutual Insurance v. American Casualty Co.

721 F. Supp. 2d 447 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 14, 2010

In United International Insurance, a high school student suffered a paralyzing injury during cheerleading practice, and sued the school board, the board of school commissioners, the individual school commissioners, and the … Brown v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 326 N.C. 387, 392 , 390 S.E.2d 150, 153 (1990).

Meyers v. Department of Human Resources of North Carolina

704 F. Supp. 616 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 15, 1987

Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … West Virginia Board of Regents, 539 F.2d 1346,1349 (4th Cir.1976). This court is especially mindful of the words of Detweiler v.

Ricketts v. Wake County Public School System

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 3, 2022

Allen v. … A government entity like defendant Board “cannot be held liable under § 1983 on a respondeat superior theory.” Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs. of N.Y., 436 U.S. 658, 691 (1978); Riddick v. Sch.

Cantey v. Flensburger Dampfercompagnie Harald Schuldt & Co.

55 F.R.D. 127 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 9, 1971

See Banks v. Hanover Steamship Corp., 43 F.R.D. 374 , 381-382 n.9 (D.Md.1967). The arguments for the right to a jury trial under these circumstances were examined at length in McCann v. … Here the claims of the shipowner and stevedore arise from occurrences on board ship, i. e., the allegedly defective band around the bale causing the injury to the plaintiff, and are therefore claims within the admiralty jurisdiction

Sturrup v. United States

218 F. Supp. 279 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 30, 1963

Bishop v. United States, supra; Bostic v. United States, D.C.Cir., 1961, 112 U.S.App.D.C. 17 , 298 F.2d 678 . … Cf: Taylor v. United States, 8th Cir., 1960, 282 F.2d 16 ; Smith v. United States, 9th Cir., 1959, 267 F.2d 210 .

In re W. W. Mills Co.

162 F. 42 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 27, 1908

In Hackney v. Raymond Bros., 10 Am. Bankr. Rep. 214, 68 Neb. 624 , 94 N. W. 822 , 99 N. … In Farmers’ Bank v. Carr, supra, the court said, upon the authority of McNair v.

Hayden v. Keller

134 F. Supp. 3d 1000 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 25, 2015

v. … Greiman v.

Cawthorn v. Circosta

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 10, 2022

(quoting eBay Inc. v. … R.E. v. Astrue, 565 F.3d 131 (4th Cir. 2009)). The Board insisted that the 1872 Act is limited in scope as “established by the action of the U.S.

Darwin v. De Los Santos

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 22, 2022

Darwin opposes the Board’s motion to stay discovery. D.E. 41. … Corp. v. Groth, 119 F.R.D. 636, 637 (M.D.N.C. 1988).

Sharma v. Circosta

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 17, 2022

_ ) Carolina State Board of Elections, STACY ) EGGERS IV, in his official capacity asa __) member of the North Carolina State Board) of Elections, TOMMY TUCKER, in his ) official capacity as a … See Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 578 U.S. 330, 338-39 (2016). Plaintiff does not assert a concrete injury in his latest filing. See Clapper v. Amnesty, Int'l USA, 568 U.S. 398, 410 (2013).

Percell v. International Business MacHines, Inc.

785 F. Supp. 1229 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 28, 1992

Pelican Management Services Corporation, 782 F.Supp. 1132 , (M.D.La.1992); Doe v. Board of County Commissioners, 783 F.Supp. 1379 (D.Fla. 1992); Burchfield v. Derwinski, 782 F.Supp. 532 (D.Fla.1992); Johnson v. … Leland v.

Coston v. Ayscue

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 23, 2023

See Wells v. Shriners Hosp., 109 F.3d 198, 200 (4th Cir. 1997). … This is the area where “Andrew Brown” was executed by the Pasquotank County Sheriffs Department.

Kennedy v. Rowe

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 10, 2023

Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 (1997); Hafer v. Melo, 502 U.S. 21, 25 (1991); Kentucky v. Graham, 473 U.S. 159, 166 (1985); Monell, 436 U.S. at 690-94; King v. … Kennedy incorrectly assumes that the Board of County Commissioners for Wake County supervises the Sheriff and the Sheriff's Office. See Compl. Jf 6—7, 39-64, 81-88; cf. Young, 368 N.C. at 669-70, 781 S.E.2d at 280.

Nix v. The Chemours Company FC, LLC

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 26, 2024

the meeting minutes for the August 2017 Chemours Board Meeting where a presentation entitled Chemours Board of Directors Meeting: Fayetteville Discussion, and the agenda for the November 2017 Chemours Board of Directors … See Monee Nursery & Landscaping Co. v.

Thornton v. Bowen

639 F. Supp. 154 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 28, 1986

Based upon this review the court concludes that the 36.25 hours requested by counsel are excessive and after employing a ten percent across-the-board reduction to counsel’s request, the court finds counsel reasonably expended … Board of Education, 611 F.2d 624, 636 (6th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 911 , 100 S.Ct. 2999 , 64 L.Ed.2d 862 (1980), and counsel must properly exercise billing judgment. See Spell v.