Case law

In re Woollcott

140 F. 460 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 7, 1905

Creditors cite, in support of their contention, Donaldson v. Farwell, 93 U. S. 631 , 23 L. Ed. 993 ; Des Farges v. Pugh, 93 N. C. 31 , 53 Am. Rep. 446 . … C. 494 ; Duvall v. Rollins, 71 N. C. 220 ; Lambert v. Kinnery, 74 N. C. 350 : Curlee v. Thomas, 74 N. C. 54 ; Board of Com’rs v. Riley, 75 N. C. 146 ; Gaster v. Hardie, 75 N. C. 460 ; Littlejohn v. Egerton, 76 N.

Pierce v. King

918 F. Supp. 932 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 7, 1996

.”); Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 572 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2706-07 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 , 43 S.Ct. 625, 626 , 67 L.Ed. 1042 (1923); Smith v. … California Ass’n of the Physically Handicapped v. F.C.C., 721 F.2d 667, 670 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 832 , 105 S.Ct. 121 , 83 L.Ed.2d 63 (1984); Brown v. Sibley, 650 F.2d 760, 766 (5th Cir.1981).

Edgerton v. North Carolina

230 F. Supp. 264 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 26, 1964

Snead v. Smyth, 273 F.2d 838 (4th Cir. 1959). … Brown v. Smyth, 271 F.2d 227 (4th Cir. 1959). Indeed it is a *268 lawyer’s duty to advise his client of the risks involved.

Rucker v. Willis

358 F. Supp. 425 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 4, 1973

In Zahn v. … Interpreting Snyder v.

Wright v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human Services

405 F. Supp. 2d 631 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 5, 2005

In Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. … This court, however, does not sit as a super-personnel board making normative assessments of what an employer ought to require as minimal qualifications for a job. See DeJarnette v.

The Jelling

253 F. 381 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 27, 1918

I said back that m,v vessel was in a sinking condition and would like to have some assistance, if not to be taken oil my vessel. … Sabean says, after he boarded the steamer, and the small boat was hoisted up: “I went up on board, shook hands with the captain, stopped there a few minutes on the main deck, and he and I went up on the second deck, where

Turner v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad

78 F.R.D. 654 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 17, 1978

He states in paragraph VI of the complaint that his employment with the defendant began on the first day of November, 1966, at which time he was assigned to the “extra board” as a switchman. … Clark v. Olinkraft, Inc., 556 F.2d 1219 (5th Cir. 1977), this court is of opinion that in view of United Air Lines, Inc. v.

Beam v. Tatum

492 F. Supp. 2d 535 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 26, 2007

Id.; see Ohio Civil Rights Comm’n v. Dayton Christian Sch., 477 U.S. 619, 626-29 , 106 S.Ct. 2718 , 91 L.Ed.2d 512 (1986); Middlesex County Ethics Comm. v. … Id. at 388 (quoting Huffman v.

United States v. Atlantic Contractors, Inc.

231 F. Supp. 356 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 7, 1964

In Farmer v. … Er-langer Mills, Inc. v. Cohoes Fibre Mills, Inc., 239 F.2d 502 (4th C.C.A.1956); Babb v. Cordell Industries, Inc., 242 N.C. 286 , 87 S.E.2d 513 (1955); Putnam v.

Livingston v. N.C. State Bar

364 F. Supp. 3d 587 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 4, 2019

Brown & Root. Inc. v. Breckenridge , 211 F.3d 194 , 199 (4th Cir. 2000) (quotation omitted). Rooker - Feldman is a "narrow doctrine." Lance v. … Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc. , 525 F.3d 370 , 376 (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Van Hazel

468 F. Supp. 2d 792 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 20, 2006

For example, in State v. … Because this case is assimilated into federal law by virtue of the alleged offenses occurring on board a federal military installation, the court is bound by the substantive law of North Carolina. Kay v.

US Fire Ins. Co. v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.

735 F. Supp. 1320 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 3, 1990

Craven County Board of Education, 70 F.R.D. 466, 478 (E.D.N.C.1976). A party may not rest on mere allegations contained in its pleadings in opposition to a motion for summary judgment. Id. … In Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v.

MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.

7 F. Supp. 2d 674 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 22, 1998

MCI alleges that certain terms of the Agreement are inconsistent with §§ ,251 and 252-, of the Act, with the ruling of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in Iowa Utilities Board v. … v.

Standard Tankers (Bahamas) Co. v. Motor Tank Vessel, AKTI

438 F. Supp. 153 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 6, 1977

Cases like Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284 , 93 S.Ct. 1038 , 35 L.Ed.2d 297 (1973), and Smith v. … See SCA Services Inc. v.

Southport Fisheries, Inc. v. Saskatchewan Government Ins.

161 F. Supp. 81 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 11, 1958

Essential to this pursuit are purse boats, which, because they cannot prudently put to sea relying upon their own resources, are carried on board larger vessels until required in active fishing operations. … Bearing in mind that ambiguities contained in marine insurance policies are to be fairly resolved against the *86 insurer who chose the language which created them, (Henjes v.

Gaxiola v. Williams Seafood of Arapahoe, Inc.

776 F. Supp. 2d 117 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 1, 2011

. § 203 (m); De Luna-Guerrero v. … In De Luna-Guerrero , this court previously held: The employer may count as “wages” under the FLSA the reasonable cost “of furnishing [an] employee with board, lodging, or other facilities, if such board, lodging, or other

United States v. One Chevrolet Sedan 1954 Model

147 F. Supp. 533 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 10, 1957

In United States v. … United States v. Ganey, 5 Cir., 1950, 183 F.2d 273 is a case closely in point with the one at issue before me.

Nicholson v. Branker

739 F. Supp. 2d 839 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 20, 2010

The next morning, July 17, 1997, Gloria went to the trailer with her stepfather and brother, Jarrin Brown, so she could get some clothes. … Brown ran to the bedroom and waited until he heard petitioner leave the trailer. He then ran outside and saw petitioner walking towards the cornfield. Brown went back inside.

Hedgepeth v. Nash County

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 14, 2024

The father of plaintiff’s two daughters is Tawaido Brown (“Brown”). (Id. at 15). … [Brown] resided at the same address”)).

Isaacson v. Toyota Motor Sales, U. S. A., Inc.

438 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 28, 1976

The first, Brown v. General Motors Corp., 355 F.2d *5 814 (4th Cir., 1966), involved the manufacture and sale of a bulldozer. … General Motors Corp., 454 F.2d 1270 (8th Cir., 1972), (applying Iowa law); Mieher v. Brown, 54 Ill.2d 539 , 301 N.E.2d 307 (1973); Cunis v. Brennan, 56 Ill.2d 372 , 308 N.E.2d 617 (1974); Nanda v.