Case law

Poisson v. Williams

15 F.2d 582 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 4, 1926

See, also, Peters v. Bain, 133 U. S. 670 , 10 S. Ct. 354 , 33 L. Ed. 696 ; Allen v. United States (C. C. A. 1st) 285 F. 678 ; Board of Commissioners of Crawford County v. Strawn (C. C. A. 6th) 157 F. 49 , 84 C. C. … S.) 1100; Weiss v. Haight (C. C.) 152 F. 479 ; Board of Com’rs v. Patterson (C. C.) 149 F. 229 ; Merchants’ Nat. Bk. v. School District (C. C. A. 9th) 94 F. 705 , 36 C. C. A. 432 ; Spokane County v. First Nat. Bk. (C.

Ward v. Coastal Carolina Health Care, P.A.

597 F. Supp. 2d 567 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 8, 2009

See, e.g., Brown v. Philip Morris Inc., 250 F.3d 789 , 804-05 (3d Cir.2001); Sung Tran v. Delavau, LLC, No. 07-3550, 2008 WL 2051992 , at *15 (E.D.Pa. May 13, 2008); Home Quest Mortgage LLC v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. … Brown, 250 F.3d at 806 (noting split of authority, but stating that the greater weight of authority does not suggest that a section 1981 claim may form the basis of a section 1985(3) action).

Quinerly v. Cherry

527 F. Supp. 1059 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 14, 1981

The testimony indicated that an armed black man, wearing a navy blue sweatshirt, brown pants, and tennis shoes, approached two people who were leaving after closing the store. The armed man said, “This is a stickup.” … Petitioner was wearing brown pants and tennis shoes. The police found a navy blue sweatshirt, with a hole in it, near petitioner. Dr.

Woodard v. Carteret County

252 F. Supp. 268 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 9, 1966

The Attorney General and the Chairman of the State Board of Elections have been dismissed upon motion. … A. v. Lomenzo, 377 U.S. 633 , 84 S.Ct. 1418 , 12 L.Ed.2d 568 (1964); Maryland Committee v. Tawes, 377 U.S. 656 , 84 S.Ct. 1429 , 12 L.Ed.2d 595 (1964); Davis v.

In re Stanley

146 B.R. 655 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 13, 1992

Stanley and the Chairman of the Board, Clemmon Jacobs. … Thibodeau v. U.S., 828 F.2d 1499, 1506 (11th Cir.1987). Counsel for Ms. Stanley rely on the decision in Holley v.

Bohan v. Hudson

115 F.R.D. 193 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 18, 1987

See Johnson v. Oroweat Foods Co., 785 F.2d 503, 510 (4th Cir.1986); Roberts v. Arizona Board of Regents, 661 F.2d 796, 798 (9th Cir.1981); Lyons v. … Board of Education of Charleston, 523 F.2d 340, 348 (8th Cir.1975); Head v. Timken Roller Bearing Co., 486 F.2d 870, 873 (6th Cir.1973).

SAS Institute Inc. v. World Programming Ltd.

64 F. Supp. 3d 755 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 21, 2014

Patricia Brown April 14, 2014, Decl. (“Brown I Decl.”) ¶ 2. Plaintiff creates an integrated suite of business software products which are known as the “SAS System.” Id. … Brown I Decl. ¶ 6; Barr Aff. ¶22. Plaintiff registers versions of its software with the United States Copyright Office, and maintains its source code as a trade secret. Brown I Decl. ¶ 6.

Ward v. Federal Crop Insurance

627 F. Supp. 1545 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 14, 1986

In Mann v. … In Brown v. Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, No. 82-3161-2 (D.S.C. Sept. 2, 1983), aff'd, 738 F.2d 428 (4th Cir.1984) the district court considered a case factually similar to the instant case.

In re Pittman

275 F. 686 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 26, 1921

Holden v. Stratton, 198 U. S. 203 . 25 Sup. Ct. 656, 49 L. Ed. 1018 . … In Allen v. Central Wis. Trust Co., 143 Wis. 381 , 127 N. W. 1003 , 139 Am. St. Rep. 1107 , 25 Am. Bankr.

Halscott Megaro, P.A. v. McCollum

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 2, 2022

Geraldine Brown Ransom was appointed as Brown’s guardian but was later removed and replaced by defendant Duane Gilliam. /d §§ 27-28. … Poor v. Hill, 138 N.C. App. 19, 26 (2000).! Prior to the commencement of this action, Megaro was disciplined by the North Carolina State Bar for his conduct in representing McCollum and Brown.

Hollowell v. Hux

229 F. Supp. 50 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 30, 1964

Janzen v. Goos, 302 F.2d 421 (8th C.C.A. 1962); Boesenberg v. Chicago Title & Trust Company, 128 F.2d 245 , 141 A.L.R. 565 (7th C.C.A. 1942). … Janzen v. Goos, supra, Scott v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, 9 F.R.D. 27 (E.D.Pa.1949).

United States v. Carolina Transformer Co., Inc.

739 F. Supp. 1030 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 13, 1989

He was a corporate director and president from 1962-1981, and he was chairman of the board from 1981 to 1984. … Kayser-Roth, supra; United States v. A & F Materials Co., 578 F.Supp. 1249, 1255 (S.D.Ill.1984); United States v. Chem-Dyne Corp., 572 F.Supp. 802, 809 (S.D.Ohio 1983); Smitk Land & Improvement Corp. v.

Major Media of Southeast, Inc. v. City of Raleigh

621 F. Supp. 1446 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 16, 1985

Village of Minnetonka, 281 Minn. 492 , 162 N.W.2d 206 (1983) (three years); Spurgeon v. Board of Commissioners of Shawnee County, 181 Kan. 1008 , 317 P.2d 798 (1952) (two years); Standard Oil Company v. … Board.

Tyson v. Pitt County Government

919 F. Supp. 205 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 28, 1996

See, e.g., Miles v. Department of Army, 881 F.2d 777 , 784 n. 6 (9th Cir.1989); Poindexter v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, 737 F.2d 1173, 1185 (D.C.Cir.1984); Caston v. … Miles v. Department of the Army, 881 F.2d 777, 784 (9th Cir.1989); See Brown-Bey v. United States, 720 F.2d 467, 471 (7th Cir.1983).

Rooks v. Finch

317 F. Supp. 1346 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 25, 1970

Warshauer, M.D., a Board-certified specialist in internal medicine. Dr. … Willis v. Gardner, 377 F.2d 533 (4th Cir. 1967); Underwood v. Ribicoff, 298 F.2d 850 (4th Cir. 1962). If there is substantial evidence to support the decision of the Secretary, this court’s inquiry must end. Laws v.

International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. North Carolina State Ports Authority

370 F. Supp. 33 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 30, 1974

In State v. … This court does not read Switchmen’s Union v. National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 (1943) as precluding review of this issue.

LStar Development Group, Inc. v. Vining

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 23, 2021

Defendants argue plaintiff fails to plausibly allege that defendants placed the statement into interstate commerce, since the proposal’s cover letter was signed by Scott Brown (“Brown”), the chief executive officer of ABA … of directors or a committee or subcommittee of the board of directors and the board of directors, or the committee or subcommittee of the board of directors, authorized, approved, or ratified the transaction

Bruce v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Company

127 F. Supp. 124 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 13, 1954

The aircraft was not being operated at said time for any purpose or in any manner or under any condition requiring a special permit or waiver by the Civil Aeronautics Board. … Travelers Protective Association of America v. Prinsen, 291 U.S. 576 , 54 S.Ct. 502 , 78 L.Ed. 999 ; United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Guenther, 280 U.S. 540 , 50 S.Ct. 25 , 74 L.Ed. 601 ; Myers v.

McDowell v. Edmisten

523 F. Supp. 416 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 30, 1981

Such denial was justified by the Craven County Board of Elections since there exists a dispute between the U.S. … Einhorn v. Maus, supra.

Alexander v. Civil Air Patrol

134 F. Supp. 691 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 26, 1955

Wass v. Suter, 1Í9 Ind.App. 655, 84 N.E.2d 734 ; Hoesel v. Cain, 222 Ind. 330 , 53 N.E.2d 165, 769 ; Frick v. Biekel, 115 Ind.App. 114 , 54 N. E.2d 436 ; D’Anna v. United States, 4 Cir., 181 F.2d 335 ; U. S. v. … S. v. Eleazer, 4 Cir., 177 F.2d 914 ; Murphey v. U. S., 9 Cir., 179 F.2d 743 ; U. S. v. Campbell, 5 Cir., 172 F.2d 500 ; Mock v. Polley, 116 Ind.App. 580 , 66 N.E.2d 78 .