Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,493 results
1.97s
121 F.R.D. 269 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 15, 1988
Ross has also included the names of Rudolph Jackson, Leonard Brown, and Tom Jones on his list of prospective deponents. … The stronger showing has been made for those named in the text above and the motion to depose Jackson, Brown, and Jones is DENIED. .
Cited 2 timesPublishedGuenther v. Dennis-Simmons Lumber Co.
246 F. 521 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 17, 1917
Y.) 406, and Bigelow v. Jones, 10 Pick. … In Jenkins v. Pye, 12 Pet. 251 , 9 L.
Cited 2 timesPublishedFirstcorp, Inc. v. Office of Thrift Supervision (In Re Firstcorp, Inc.)
129 B.R. 450 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 12, 1991
The acquisition was approved by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (“FHLBB”). … Rubin v. United States, 449 U.S. 424, 430 , 101 S.Ct. 698, 701 , 66 L.Ed.2d 633 (1981).
Cited 4 timesPublished109 F. 866 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 6, 1901
Roosevelt v. Kellogg, 20 Johns. (N. Y.) 208; Sears v. City of Boston, 1 Metc. (Mass.) 251. … Inhabitants of Jefferson v. Inhabitants of Washington, 19 Me. 293 ; 2 Kent, Comm. (10th Ed.) 576.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMutschler v. Housing Authority
985 F. Supp. 612 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 20, 1997
Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977); Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968); Hughes v. … Hughes v. Bedsole, 48 F.3d 1376 , 1385 (4th Cir.1995); Hanton v. Gilbert, 36 F.3d 4, 6-7 (4th Cir. 1994).
Cited 0 timesPublished244 F. Supp. 3d 525 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 23, 2017
Nat'l Ass’n of Boards of Pharmacy v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. Sys. of Georgia, 633 F.3d 1297, 1316 (11th Cir. 2011) (quoting City of Boerne v. … Berge v. Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala., 104 F.3d 1453 (4th Cir. 1997).
Cited 3 timesPublishedA Hand of Hope Pregnancy Res. Ctr. v. City of Raleigh
386 F. Supp. 3d 618 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 2, 2019
In December 2016, the entity that owns A Preferred Women's Health Center appealed Crane's interpretation to the Raleigh Board of Adjustment (the "Board"). (Second Am. Compl. (DE # 98), ¶ 52.) … The Board conducted a hearing on 13 February 2017.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCoastal Neuro-Psychiatric Associates, P.A. v. Onslow County Hospital Authority
607 F. Supp. 49 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 21, 1985
State Action Exemption In Parker v. … In Goldfarb v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedWard v. Security Atlantic Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
858 F. Supp. 2d 561 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 14, 2012
March 11, 2011) (dismissing plaintiffs claim for rescission because neither the complaint nor the briefs specified an ability or intent to repay the loan and collecting cases holding the same); Brown v. HSBC Mortg. … See Moore v.
Cited 21 timesPublished419 F. Supp. 2d 785 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 9, 2005
See Houpe v. … The North Carolina Court of Appeals’ holding in Ripellino v. North Carolina School Boards Ass’n, Inc., 158 N.C.App. 423 , 581 S.E.2d 88 (2003), further buttresses this conclusion.
Cited 15 timesPublished567 F. Supp. 1457 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 25, 1983
Cameron-Brown Company, 72 F.R.D. 48, 62 (M.D.N.C.1976). In Hudson v. Capital Management International, Inc., Fed.S.L.Rep. … Denny v. Carey, 72 F.R.D. 574 (E.D.Pa.1976). Therefore, defendants’ motion to dismiss is denied. Defendants’ motion for a more definite statement is also denied.
Cited 4 timesPublishedStrates Shows, Inc. v. Amusements of America, Inc.
379 F. Supp. 2d 817 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 25, 2005
Co. v. … Contr., Inc. v.
Cited 27 timesPublished999 F. Supp. 2d 845 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 12, 2014
Shively v. Heckler, 739 F.2d 987, 989 (4th Cir.1984) (quoting Laws v. Celebrezze, 368 F.2d 640, 642 (4th Cir.1966)). If the Commissioner’s decision is supported by such evidence, it must be affirmed. Smith v. … Pass v. Chater, 65 F.3d 1200, 1203 (4th Cir.1995).
Cited 1 timesPublished15 F.2d 582 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 4, 1926
See, also, Peters v. Bain, 133 U. S. 670 , 10 S. Ct. 354 , 33 L. Ed. 696 ; Allen v. United States (C. C. A. 1st) 285 F. 678 ; Board of Commissioners of Crawford County v. Strawn (C. C. A. 6th) 157 F. 49 , 84 C. C. … S.) 1100; Weiss v. Haight (C. C.) 152 F. 479 ; Board of Com’rs v. Patterson (C. C.) 149 F. 229 ; Merchants’ Nat. Bk. v. School District (C. C. A. 9th) 94 F. 705 , 36 C. C. A. 432 ; Spokane County v. First Nat. Bk. (C.
Cited 10 timesPublished9 F. Supp. 2d 565 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 26, 1998
Coy v. … If an issue is briefed and argued before a military board of review, it has been given fair consideration, even if the military court summarily denies it. Watson v.
Cited 5 timesPublished747 F. Supp. 305 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 9, 1990
On November 4, 1987, after serving 7 months in prison, petitioner received his initial parole board hearing. … See McKart v.
Cited 4 timesPublished260 F. 862 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 30, 1919
She was then under requisition of the Shipping Board of the United States. … C.) 156 Fed. 512 ; United States v. N. Y. O. & S. S. Co., 216 Fed. 61 (71), 132 C. C. A. 305 ; The Giulia, 218 Fed. 744 , 134 C. C.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDressel v. North State Lumber Co.
107 F. 255 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 11, 1901
This would be to open wide the doors for fraud, which could have never been intended by the congress of the United States; but, as held by Judge Brown, of the Southern district of New York, in Re Marine Machine & Conveyor … West Co. v. Lea, 174 U. S. 590 , 19 Sup. Ct. 836, 43 L. Ed. 1098 . The restraining order will therefore be continued in full force until the further order of this court.
Cited 9 timesPublished913 F. Supp. 420 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 3, 1994
Healthy City School District Board of Education v. … Such a showing has long been required under the cases of Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972), and Bishop v.
Cited 8 timesPublished570 F. Supp. 863 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 21, 1983
(Thomas v. Review Board, at 715-716, 101 S.Ct. at 1430-1431 ). Likewise, in Moskowitz v. … Thomas v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security Division, supra.
Questioned on other grounds by Cooper v. Rogers, 788 F. Supp. 255 (1991)Cited 7 timesPublished
Ask Donna