Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnced

632 results

0.69s

  • Plotkin v. Association of Eye Care Centers, Inc.

    710 F. Supp. 156 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 13, 1989

    Life and Health Benefits Administration, Inc., 617 F.2d 1208 (5th Cir.1980), cert. den. 450 U.S. 1030 , 101 S.Ct. 1739 , 68 L.Ed.2d 225 (1981), a trust which provided group insurance for employers too small to qualify for … group rates on their own was neither established nor maintained by an “employer” or “employee organization” under ERISA, and therefore not covered by ERISA, where the trust was a proprietary enterprise, established and operated

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • JACKSONVILLE PROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION LOCAL 2961, IAFF v. City of Jacksonville

    685 F. Supp. 513 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 28, 1987

    Effective September 6, 1985, a daily work period of 24 hours and 15 minutes will be established for all shifts. … As its creator, Congress has the authority to establish conditions affecting that right as it sees fit.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Norfolk Southern R. v. Stricklin

    264 F. 546 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 2, 1920

    It is enough if the purpose of the bill is to establish a single right between the complainant and the several defendants.” Prof. … This is in accordance with the rule of law that, when the reason upon which immunity from sale of property ceases, the immunity also ceases.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Velez v. Whitley

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 29, 2022

    Pekatos testified that he “was looking for someone who would very strong and confident display in their mannerism, someone who could talk clearly and talk well.” Pekatos Dep. at 12. … Initially, Velez must establish a prima facie case of sex discrimination.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Foley v. Express Support Home Care, LLC

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 20, 2024

    Nor did it clearly set out the facts supporting her discrimination claim. … Foley’s Second Amended Complaint establishes that she did not file her charge of discrimination within the time required by Title VII and the ADA.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Parker v. Craven County, North Carolina

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 2, 2019

    Plaintiff was clearly qualified for the position, given the high rank she held in the Department of Tax Collection, her college degree in accounting, and her 26 years of experience. … Defendant argues, effectively, that plaintiff has not established causation.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. White

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 6, 2023

    Any claim for damages, the United States argues, would also be barred by principles of sovereign immunity. … Having established that the documents are relevant and that White must produce them, the Court turns to Sykes’ motion to quash.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ghazaly v. First National Collection Bureau, Inc.

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 8, 2022

    Facts demonstrating each element must be clearly alleged. Id.; see Lujan v. … Defendant, bearing the burden of establishing standing on removal, has thus failed to establish standing on the facts alleged in plaintiff’s complaint. See Strawn, 530 F.3d at 296.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cronenberg v. United States

    123 F. Supp. 693 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 18, 1954

    The evidence does not establish that adequate motive power, either from the motor itself or the electric starter, was available for propelling the vehicle onto the shoulder after the motor stalled; nor does the evidence establish … head lamps of motor vehicles shall fee so constructed, arranged, and adjusted that * * * they will at all times * * * under normal atmospheric conditions and on a level road, produce a driving light sufficient to render clearly

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • U.S. Tobacco Cooperative, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's Subscribing to Policy Numbers B1353DC1703690000 and B1353DC1602041000

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 9, 2021

    Once a document qualifies as opinion work- product it is immune from discovery, except in “very rare and exceptional circumstances.” In re Allen, 106 F.3d 582, 607 (4th Cir. 1997). … Besides not establishing that the documents are immune from discovery, the Insurers have failed to show that they have not waived protections that might otherwise apply.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Farmer v. United States

    867 F. Supp. 2d 785 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 3, 2012

    Simmons’s sentence in light of Carachuri-Rosendo, holding that the opinion of the Supreme Court “clearly foreleose[d] reliance on Harp. 1 ” Simmons, 649 F.3d at 247 . … The Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, felt that Carachuri’s holding that the “actual recidivist finding ... must be part of a particular defendant’s record of conviction for the conviction to qualify as a felony,” compelled

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pratt Lumber Co. v. T. H. Gill Co.

    278 F. 783 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 26, 1922

    Ashley receiver of said defendant company, who duly qualified by filing the bond prescribed in said order, and entered upon the discharge of his duties as receiver. … This distinction is clearly stated in American Surety Company v. Finletter, supra.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Spirax Sarco, Inc. v. SSI Engineering, Inc.

    122 F. Supp. 3d 408 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 10, 2015

    Here, “all the facts necessary” to establish the defense are not apparent from the face of the complaint. … An act is unfair “when it offends established public policy!

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Seago v. North Carolina Theatres, Inc.

    42 F.R.D. 627 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 29, 1966

    Plaintiff’s first affidavit states that it was the purpose of the •plaintiff to run the Colony Theatre as a '“first-run theatre,” and that the Colony •was qualified to be a first-run theatre. … This does not establish conspiracy or even evidence of a conspiracy standing alone.

    Cited 165 timesPublished
  • Maliki v. Blinken

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 14, 2025

    Judgment on the pleadings should be granted therefore only “where the moving party is clearly entitled to the judgment it seeks as a matter of law.” Med-Trans Corp. v. Benton, 581 F. … First, USCIS must grant approval of the petition if the principal refugee establishes a qualifying relationship such as a spouse or unmarried minor child. 8 C.F.R. § 207.7(a), (d).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Trudell Medical International v. D R Burton Healthcare, LLC

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 1, 2023

    “As [Trudell] bore the burden of proof on the question of literal infringement, to be entitled to judgment as a matter of law it must establish that the evidence was not only sufficient to meet this burden, but is … During trial, the parties presented conflicting testimony regarding what qualified as a “vane.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • LaNier v. LaNier

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 23, 2024

    Provided that a party’s claims are not clearly baseless, the court must weigh the factual allegations in the party’s favor in its frivolity analysis. Denton, 504 U.S. at 32. … As another court in this circuit has stated: It is well-established that to prove a conspiracy under section 1985, a plaintiff must establish (1) a conspiracy of two or more persons, (2) who are

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Blohm v. Dillard's Inc.

    95 F. Supp. 2d 473 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 6, 2000

    Under the relevant FMLA regulations, an employee shall provide at least verbal notice sufficient to make the employer aware that the employee needs FMLA-qualifying leave, and the anticipated timing and duration of the leave … Plaintiff must, however, establish a causal link between the two to set forth a prima facie case. See Cline, 144 F.3d at 301 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Guerra v. Scruggs

    747 F. Supp. 1160 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 27, 1990

    Such stigmatization will adversely affect plaintiffs efforts to re-establish himself in civilian life after his discharge. Characterization as a drug abuser will lead many, if not most, employers to reject him. … Such a stigma clearly implicates plaintiff’s liberty in *1168 terests to which due process protections apply.

    Reversed by Guerra v. Scruggs, 942 F.2d 270 (1991)Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Lewis v. Murphy-Brown, LLC

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 16, 2020

    In his complaint, plaintiff states that the Kinlaw Farms operation was established “in or around 1995.” (Compl., DE # 8, ¶ 30.) … In his response, plaintiff contends that defendant’s removal of its swine from the Kinlaw Farms operation in 2018 qualifies as “a fundamental change,” within one year of which he filed this action, thereby satisfying the

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.