Case law

National Spinning Co. v. City of Washington

312 F. Supp. 958 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 4, 1970

Leve v. General Motors Corp., 246 F.Supp. 761 (D.C.N.Y., 1965). … Scot Typewriter Co., Inc. v. Underwood Corp., 170 F.Supp. 862 .

In re F. H. Saunders & Co.

272 F. 1003 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 20, 1921

It is not suggested in the arguments, or briefs of counsel, that the decision in Brown v. Sartor overrules, or is inconsistent with, King v. Fraser. … It may be that the construction put upon the proviso of 1898 in Brown v.

National Wildlife Federation v. Hanson

623 F. Supp. 1539 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 20, 1985

Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Fed. Home Loan Bank Board, 600 F.2d 681, 689 (7th Cir.1979) (holding that agency must provide more in-depth explanation for issues subject to vigorous controversy). … Buitrey v.

Lambertus v. Nuvo Solutions, Inc.

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 29, 2025

v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986). … McCollough v. Branch Banking & Trust Co., 35 F.3d 127, 131 (4th Cir. 1994); see also Ft. Bend County, Texas v. Davis, 139 S.

Fox v. City of Greenville

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 21, 2024

No. 2,31 F.3d 183, 196 (4th Cir. 1994) (school district could face Monell liability for school board’s dismissal of teacher because board supported school superintendent’s efforts to retaliate against teacher after she … Board of Cnty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 405 (1997).° As such, declining to discipline a subordinate is not tantamount to ratifying the underlying conduct of that subordinate.

Taylor v. United States

89 F. Supp. 3d 766 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 19, 2014

See Canady v. … Brown Associates, Inc. v. Rockville Ctr.

In re Old Dominion S. S. Co.

115 F. 845 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 7, 1902

Ed 130 (cited as Flint v. … Quinlan v. Pew, 5 C. C. A. 438 , 56 Fed. 111 .

Davis v. Halifax County School System

508 F. Supp. 966 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 26, 1981

Stanley v. Wimbish, 154 F.2d 773, 775 (4th Cir. 1946); Witter v. Pennsylvania National Guard, 462 F.Supp. 299, 305 (E.D.Pa. 1978); Cason v. Emanuel County Board of Education, 85 CCH Labor Cases 20,886 (S.D. Ga.1979). … See Mowdy v. Ada Board of Education, 440 F.Supp. 1184 (E.D.Okla.1977). In the second place, the abolition of plaintiffs particular class did not occur until a year after his resignation. 2 .

Moore v. Bennett

777 F. Supp. 2d 969 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 23, 2011

Cochran v. Morris, 73 F.3d 1310, 1317 (4th Cir.1996); Adams v. Rice, 40 F.3d 72, 74 (4th Cir.1994). … See Koutnik v. Brown, 456 F.3d 777, 781 (7th Cir.2006). Given the facts as outlined and series of events, no retaliation claim has been made.

Paul v. United States

222 F. Supp. 102 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 27, 1963

United States v. Jeffcoat, 4 Cir., 272 F.2d 266 ; Donaldson v. United States, 6 Cir., 264 F.2d 804 ; Donaldson v. United States, 6 Cir., 258 F.2d 591 ; Miller v. United States, 6 Cir., 242 F.2d 392 ; Corbin v. … If no appeal is taken from the county committee to the review board, such committee’s decision is final. § 1363. A dissatisfied farmer who has not exhausted the review board remedy cannot reach the courts.

Justice v. North Carolina Department Health and Human Services Secretary

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 22, 2020

Defendant Granville County Board of Commissioners2 (“Granville 1 As a general rule, “an amended pleading ordinarily supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect.” Young v. … Riddick v. Sch. Bd. of City of Portsmouth, 238 F.3d 518, 524 (4th Cir. 2000) (internal quotations omitted) (citing Bd. of Cty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 406–07 (1997)).

United States v. Martin

180 F. Supp. 3d 373 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 18, 2016

United States v. Brown, 701 F.3d 120, 126 (4th Cir.2012) (quoting Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 357 , 88 S.Ct. 507 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967)). … Brown, 701 F.3d at 126 .

Edwards

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 5, 2026

See Brown v. Gilmore, 278 F.3d 362, 369 (4th Cir. 2002). … See Brown, 278 F.3d at 367; see also Rogers y. Pendleton, 249 F.3d 279, 294 (4th Cir. 2001); Byers v. City of Richmond, 746 F. Supp. 3d 275, 324 n.37 (E.D. Va. 2024).

Pope v. Farland

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 10, 2020

See Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Wigand, 913 F. Supp. 530, 531 (W.D. Ky. 1996); Kaplansky v. Associated YM-YWHA’s of Greater New York, Inc., No. 88 CV 1292, 1989 WL 29938, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 27, 1989).? … In Brown, the defendant removed a civil action that his former employer filed against him for fraud, theft, breach of contract, and breach of fiduciary duties. See Brown, 913 F. Supp. at 531.

Eure v. NVF Co.

481 F. Supp. 639 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 21, 1979

National Market Reports, Inc. v. Brown, 443 F.Supp. 1301 , 1305 n.7 (S.D.W.Va.1978). In so holding, this court follows the line of cases which have rejected the reasoning of State of Ohio ex rel. Seney v. … E. g., Brown, supra; Olsen v. Doerfler, 225 F.Supp. 540 (E.D.Mich.1963); and State Tax Commission v.

Williams v. Batton

342 F. Supp. 1110 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 3, 1972

In Brown v. … Raderman v. Kaine, 411 F.2d 1102 (2nd Cir. 1969); Gianatasio v. Whyte, 426 F.2d 908 (2nd Cir. 1970). These cases are clearly applicable in the present case.

Duke v. Uniroyal, Inc.

743 F. Supp. 1218 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 2, 1990

See e.g., Wildman v. Lerner Stores Corp., 771 F.2d 605 (1st Cir.1985). The Supreme Court addressed this issue in Pennsylvania v. … The court agrees and again will apply an across-the-board percentage to account for unrecoverable expenses.

United States v. State of North Carolina

425 F. Supp. 789 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 27, 1977

Leighton v. N.Y.S. and W. Railroad Company, 306 F.Supp. 513 (D.C.N.Y.1969); Wright and Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil § 2392. EFFECT OF WASHINGTON v. … In Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corporation, - U.S. -, 97 S.Ct. 555 , 50 L.Ed.2d 450 (1977), the court stated: “Our decision last Term in Washington v.

United States v. Stroop

121 F.R.D. 269 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 15, 1988

Ross has also included the names of Rudolph Jackson, Leonard Brown, and Tom Jones on his list of prospective deponents. … The stronger showing has been made for those named in the text above and the motion to depose Jackson, Brown, and Jones is DENIED. .

Guenther v. Dennis-Simmons Lumber Co.

246 F. 521 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 17, 1917

Y.) 406, and Bigelow v. Jones, 10 Pick. … In Jenkins v. Pye, 12 Pet. 251 , 9 L.