Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnced

1,493 results

0.79s

  • Swinson v. United States Parole Commission

    682 F. Supp. 29 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 18, 1988

    Caruso v. United States Board of Parole, 570 F.2d 1150, 1152 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 911 , 98 S.Ct. 2249 , 56 L.Ed.2d 411 (1978). … McGinnis v. Royster, 410 U.S. 263, 270 [ 93 S.Ct. 1055, 1059 , 35 L.Ed.2d 282 ] ... (1973)....” Romano v. Luther, supra at 842.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Davis v. State of North Carolina

    196 F. Supp. 488 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 25, 1961

    See Brown v. Allen, 1953, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 ; Cooper v. Denno, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1954, 129 F.Supp. 123 , affirmed United States ex rel. Cooper v. Denno, 2 Cir., 1955, 221 F.2d 626 . … Brown v. Allen, 1953, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S.Ct. 397 .

    Reversed on other grounds by Elmer Davis, Jr. v. State of North Carolina, 310 F.2d 904 (1962)Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Philips v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc.

    503 F. Supp. 2d 785 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 2, 2007

    Philips v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital, No. 4:05-CV-95-F(3). … See Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957). When reviewing a motion to dismiss, the court assumes the facts alleged in the complaint are true, see McNair v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Bricks (NC) Community Federal Credit Union Charter 01540 v. National Credit Union Administration

    50 F. Supp. 2d 509 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 16, 1999

    See, e.g., Biscayne Federal Savings & Loan Assoc. v. … The term "Board’,' is defined in 12 U.S.C. § 1752 (4) as "the National Credit Union Administration Board.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cavanagh v. Brock

    577 F. Supp. 176 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 22, 1983

    Jackson v. Guilford County Board of Adjustment, 275 N.C. 155, 168-69 , 166 S.E.2d 78, 87 (1969). … See Griffin v. County School Board, 377 U.S. 218, 228-29 , 84 S.Ct. 1226, 1231-32 , 12 L.Ed.2d 256 (1964).

    Declined to follow by Stephenson v. Bartlett, 355 N.C. 354 (2002)Cited 18 timesPublished
  • United States v. Rivera

    372 F. Supp. 3d 311 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 5, 2019

    See Kyllo v. United States , 533 U.S. 27 , 34, 121 S.Ct. 2038 , 150 L.Ed.2d 94 (2001) ; see also Brown v. Entm't Merch. Ass'n , 564 U.S. 786 , 790, 131 S.Ct. 2729 , 180 L.Ed.2d 708 (2011) ; Carpenter v. … Similarly, in Brown , the Supreme Court held that violent video games are protected speech under the First Amendment.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Erik v. BY AND THROUGH CATHERINE v. v. CAUSBY

    977 F. Supp. 384 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 28, 1997

    Sandlin v. Johnson, 643 F.2d 1027, 1029 (4th Cir.1981) (citing Board of Curators of University of Missouri v. Horowitz, 435 U.S. 78, 90-91 , 98 S.Ct. 948, 955 , 55 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978)). … See Bester v. Tuscaloosa City Bd. of Ed., 722 F.2d 1514, 1516 (11th Cir.1984) (citing Board of Regents v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Wineman

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 6, 2023

    The United States Supreme Court has explained the contours of this category following Monell, in Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati, 475 U.S. 469 (1986), and Board of County Commissioners of Bryan County, Oklahoma v. … Brown, 520 U.S. at 405; see, e.g., Avery v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Davis v. U. S. Gas Screw Nola Dare

    125 F. Supp. 677 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 16, 1954

    Piedmont & George’s Creek Coal Company v. Seaboard Fisheries Company, 254 U.S. 1 , 41 S.Ct. 1 , 65 L.Ed. 97 , relied upon by respondent, does not support his position. … Differing with views of counsel for respondent, I think Jeffrey v. Henderson Bros., 4 Cir., 193 F.2d 589 , is in *679 point for libelant.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Solomon v. Dixon

    724 F. Supp. 1193 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 5, 1989

    Migra v. Warren City *1196 School District Board of Education, 465 U.S. 75 , 104 S.Ct. 892 , 79 L.Ed.2d 56 (1984). … Nash County Board of Education v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In re Elias

    240 F. 448 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 15, 1917

    Stuart v. Reynolds, 204 Fed. 709 , 123 C. C. … A. 446 , and concurring in Samel v. Dodd, supra, wrote an exhaustive opinion in Stuart v. Reynolds.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Harper v. Lewis

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 8, 2020

    Common Cause v. Lewis, 956 F.3d 246, 257 (4th Cir. 2020) (quoting Common Cause v. Lewis, 358 F. Supp. 3d 505, 515 (E.D.N.C. 2019)). … State Conference of NAACP v. McCrory, 831 F.3d 204, 214 (4th Cir. 2016), Bethune-Hill v. Virginia State Bd. of Elections, 137 S. Ct. 788, 802 (2017), and Bartlett v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Harper v. Lewis

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 22, 2019

    The State Board of Elections Defendants are officers and members of the North Carolina State Board of Elections in their official capacities. … (citing Abbott v. Perez, 138 S.Ct. 2305, 2327 (2018)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Carlyle v. Sitterson

    438 F. Supp. 956 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 15, 1975

    Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U.S. 134 , 94 S.Ct. 1633 , 40 L.Ed.2d 15 (1974); Perry v. Sindermann, supra, and Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Terminations based upon alleged racism, Wellner v. Minnesota State Junior College Board, 487 F.2d 153 (8th Cir., 1973), dishonesty and lack of integrity, Hostrop v. Board of Junior College Dist.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Cox v. Stanton

    381 F. Supp. 349 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 22, 1974

    Defendants’ contention that members of the Eugenics Board are entitled to the same degree of immunity as officers of the judiciary under Pierson v. … See Norman v. Connecticut State Board of Parole, 458 F.2d 497 (2nd Cir. 1972) and DiJulio v. Digicon, Inc., 339 F.Supp. 1284 (D.Md.1972), both citing Bailey v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Richmond Cedar Works v. Pittsburg Land & Lumber Co.

    238 F. 820 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 11, 1916

    The board will take prompt measures to have them removed or punished.” … Naylor v. Foreman Blades Co. (D. C.) 230 Fed. 658 . The bill will be dismissed, and the cost taxed against plaintiff. A decree may be drawn accordingly.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Aron v. Laird

    358 F. Supp. 1170 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 20, 1973

    Brooks v. Clifford, supra, 409 F.2d at 707 . … Helwick v. Laird, 438 F.2d 959 (5th Cir. 1971).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • VENTURTECH II v. Deloitte Haskins & Sells

    790 F. Supp. 576 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 1, 1992

    of Directors (“the Board”). … At the May 17, 1985, Board meeting, the Board approved the formation of an audit committee comprised of Strohm and White.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • In Re FAC Realty Securities Litigation

    990 F. Supp. 416 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 5, 1997

    Gasner v. County of Dinwiddie, 162 F.R.D. 280, 282 (E.D.Va.1995); see, e.g., Cortec Indus. Inc. v. Sum Holding L.P., 949 F.2d 42 , 47 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied sub nom Cortec Indus. Inc. v. … Partnership v. Adage, Inc., 42 F.3d 204, 208 (4th Cir.1994); Malone v. Microdyne *421 Corp., 26 F.3d 471, 476 (4th Cir.1994); Cooke v. Manufactured Homes, Inc., 998 F.2d 1256, 1260-61 (4th Cir.1993).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Perry v. Pamlico County

    88 F. Supp. 3d 518 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 18, 2015

    Brown, 520 U.S. at 410 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 . … Brown, 520 U.S. at 407-09 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 ; see Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S. 51 , 131 S.Ct. 1350, 1359-60 , 179 L.Ed.2d 417 (2011); Harris, 489 U.S. at 388-91 , 109 S.Ct. 1197 ; Doe v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.