Case law

United States v. Waste Industries

556 F. Supp. 1301 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 30, 1982

Ernst & Ernst v. … Brown, Laying Waste 8-12 (1979). A site which the current owner controlled while it was used for waste disposal is an inactive site.

Morrisroe v. Goldsboro Milling Co.

884 F. Supp. 192 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 24, 1994

Leonard v. Carmichael Properties and Mgmt. Co., 614 F.Supp. 1182, 1188 (S.D.Fla.1985). See also New Floridian Hotel, 676 F.2d at 475 ; Washington v. Miller, 721 F.2d 797, 803 (11th Cir.1983); Brennan v. … Brennan v. Heard, 491 F.2d 1, 4 (5th Cir.1974).

Hampton v. North Carolina Pulp Co.

49 F. Supp. 625 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 20, 1943

Surratt v. Dennis, 199 N.C. 757 , 155 S.E. 865 ; Gray v. High Point, 203 N. C. 756 , 166 S.E. 911 ; Pedric v. Raleigh & P. S. R. Co., supra; McManus v. Southern R. Co., supra; Reyburn v. Sawyer, supra; Pruitt v. … In Dunn v.

Vaughn v. Garrison

534 F. Supp. 90 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 21, 1981

See Carroll v. Brown, 560 F.2d 1177 (4th Cir. 1977). This religious practice is one of the criteria to determine whether an individual is a practicing Muslim. … Although a prisoner retains substantial First Amendment rights despite his incarceration, Brown v.

Davenport v. North Carolina Department of Transportation

776 F. Supp. 1080 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 22, 1991

Crump v. Board of Education of Hickory Administrative School Unit, 326 N.C. 603 , 392 S.E.2d 579 (1990). In Crump , the Superior Court severed the two claims upon the motion of the defendants, the Board of Education. … Nash County Board of Education v. Biltmore County, 640 F.2d 484 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 878 , 102 S.Ct. 359 , 70 L.Ed.2d 188 (1991).

Richmond Cedar Works v. Pinnix

208 F. 785 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 1, 1913

Brown v. Hutchinson, 155 N. C. 210 , 71 S. E. 302 ; Johnson v. Lumber Co., 147 N. C. 251 , 60 S. E. 1129 . … In Berry v. McPherson, 153 N. C. 4 , 68 S. E. 892 , Mr. Justice Brown says: “The land in controversy appears to be swamp land, uninclosed, and with no habitation upon it.

National Bank of Goldsboro v. Hill

226 F. 102 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 23, 1915

In support of the deed, ‘Ut res magis valeat quam pereat.’ ” In Cochran v. Improvement Co., 127 N. C. 386 , 37 S. E. 496 , the decisions are cited and commented upon by Mr. Justice Eurches. Brown v. Hutchinson, 155 N. … In Haydon v.

Spell v. McDaniel

616 F. Supp. 1069 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 10, 1985

Merkel v. Scovill, Inc., 590 F.Supp. at 536 . See also Craik v. Minnesota State University Board, 738 F.2d at 350; Northcross v. Board of Education of Memphis, 611 F.2d at 638 ; Blatt v. … See e.g., Craik v. Minnesota State University Board, 738 F.2d at 350 (1.25 multiplier); Yates v. Mobile County Personnel Board, 719 F.2d at 1534 (1.35 multiplier); Graves v.

Parker v. Ross

330 F. Supp. 13 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 10, 1971

In Fay v. … Reece v. State of Georgia, 350 U.S. 85 , 76 S.Ct. 167 , 100 L.Ed. 77 (1955); Patton v. State of Mississippi, 332 U.S. 463 , 68 S.Ct. 184 , 92 L.Ed. 76 (1947); Norris v.

Fox v. North Carolina

266 F. Supp. 19 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 3, 1967

Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1953); Thomas v. Cunningham, 313 F.2d 934 at 937 (4 Cir. 1963). … The constitutionality of this requirement was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L. Ed. 469 (1953). .

Haith v. Martin

618 F. Supp. 410 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 27, 1985

Thus, in Dougherty County, Georgia, Board of Education v. … McCain v. Lybrand, 465 U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. at 1044 , quoting Connor v. Waller, 421 U.S. 656 , 95 S.Ct. 2003 , 44 L.Ed.2d 486 (1975).

Westmoreland v. Laird

364 F. Supp. 948 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 2, 1973

Brown v. Zuckert, 349 F.2d 461 (7th Cir. 1965). Where, as here, the facts are really not in dispute (plaintiff simply stayed out of work after having been told not to) there was little if anything left to investigate. … See Graniteville Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Comm., 438 F.2d 32 (4th Cir. 1971) and Brown v. Gaston County Dyeing Machine Co., 457 F.2d 1377, 1382 (4th Cir. 1972). Compare United States v.

South Shell Investment v. Town of Wrightsville Beach

703 F. Supp. 1192 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 6, 1988

The Board of Aldermen of the Town of Wrightsville Beach, North Carolina (“Board”), is the governing body of the Town. 9. … Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471, 485 , 90 S.Ct. 1153, 1161 , 25 L.Ed. 2d 491 , (1970). Plaintiffs cite Nollan v.

North Carolina v. Heckler

584 F. Supp. 179 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 26, 1984

There is considerable overlap between the two categories, Massachusetts v. Departmental Grant Appeals Board, 698 F.2d 22 (1st Cir.1983), with some determinations having characteristics of each. … The First Circuit’s functional approach of Massachusetts v. Departmental Grant Appeals Board, 698 F.2d at 27 ; see p. 184, supra, also confirms the Secretary’s decision.

Jones v. Mundy

792 F. Supp. 1009 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 5, 1992

U.S. v. Pritchard, 413 F.2d 663 (4th Cir.1969). Review is also limited to the administrative record. Armstrong v. … Brooks v. Clifford, 412 F.2d 1137 (4th Cir.1969).

American Petroleum Institute v. Cooper

681 F. Supp. 2d 635 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 26, 2010

Heald, 544 U.S. 460, 489 , 125 S.Ct. 1885 , 161 L.Ed.2d 796 (2005) (quoting New Energy Co. of Ind. v. Limbach, 486 U.S. 269, 278 , 108 S.Ct. 1803 , 100 L.Ed.2d 302 (1988)); see also Brown v. … Brown, 561 F.3d at 363 .

Benfield v. Bounds

363 F. Supp. 160 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 13, 1973

Sostre v. McGinnis, 442 F.2d 178 (2d Cir. 1971); Lathrop v. Brewer, 340 F.Supp. 873 (S.D.Iowa 1972); Theriault v. Carlson, 339 F. Supp. 375 (N.D.Ga.1972). … McKenzie v. Secretary of Public Safety, No. 72-1200 (4th Cir., filed Nov. 22, 1972), citing Sostre v. McGinnis, 442 F.2d 178 (2d Cir. 1971); Breeden v. Jackson, 457 F.2d 578 (4th Cir. 1972); Landman v.

Smith v. Atkins

777 F. Supp. 2d 955 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 22, 2011

Farmer, 511 U.S. at 835 , 114 S.Ct. 1970 ; Iko, 535 F.3d at 241-42 ; Brown v. Harris, 240 F.3d 383, 389 (4th Cir.2001). … Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403-04 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997); Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 694 , 98 S.Ct. 2018 , 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978); Carter v.

Howard v. College of the Albemarle

262 F. Supp. 3d 322 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 27, 2017

Furthermore, this court does not sit as a super-personnel board and ask whether COA (through Dei-temeyer) should have excused Howard’s poor performance or given him more time to improve. See Anderson v. … See Proud v.

Stott v. Martin

725 F. Supp. 1365 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 31, 1989

Brown Class member Brown was employed as Chief of the Fishery Services Section until he retired on 7 November 1987. … Id. quoting Brown v. Trench, 787 F.2d 167, 168 (3d Cir.1986). The court is not inclined to adopt such a rigid approach.