Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,493 results
1.98s
914 F. Supp. 2d 735 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 21, 2012
See Johnson v. … Tuck v.
Cited 13 timesPublished155 F. Supp. 482 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 26, 1957
Parker v. … In Board of Trade of City of Chicago v.
Vacated on other grounds by Quentin Stroud v. Ezra T. Benson, Secretary of Agriculture of the United States of America, 254 F.2d 448 (1958)Cited 6 timesPublishedSwann v. Source One Staffing Solutions
778 F. Supp. 2d 611 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 24, 2011
Applied Radiant Energy Corp., 240 F.3d 262, 265-66 (4th Cir.2001); Brown v. Perry, 184 F.3d 388, 395 (4th Cir.1999); Lissau v. S. … Brown, 184 F.3d at 395 ; Dowdy v. North Carolina, 23 Fed.Appx. 121, 123 (4th Cir.2001) (per curiam) (unpublished).
Cited 4 timesPublishedFederal Deposit Insurance v. Butler (In Re Conner Corp.)
127 B.R. 775 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 15, 1991
Thus, although the Bank Board was acting in its regulatory sphere, a contract had been formed. See also Century Federal Sav. Bank v. … Labeling the conduct of the Bank Board as regulatory does not resolve the issue of whether that conduct also created a contract. In Resolution Trust Corp. v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedBoyd v. City of Wilmington, NC
943 F. Supp. 585 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 23, 1996
Patterson v. McLean Credit Union, 39 F.3d 515, 518 (4th Cir.1994) (quoting Shaw v. … (Brown Dep. at 96-97).
Cited 0 timesPublished863 F. Supp. 2d 516 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 28, 2012
Talbot Cnty., Md., 828 F.2d 228, 231-32 (4th Cir.1987); Browning-Ferris, Inc. v. Balt. Cnty., Md., 774 F.2d 77 , 79 (4th Cir.1985); Caleb Stowe Assocs., Ltd. v. … Lucas v. S.C.
Cited 4 timesPublishedMitchell v. North Carolina Division of Employment Security
76 F. Supp. 3d 620 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 3, 2014
Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 152 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984) (per curiam). Mitchell’s complaint contains no direct evidence of retaliation. Instead, he relies on the McDonnell Douglas. framework. … of Review, and finally may obtain judicial review of an adverse Board of Review decision in the North Carolina Superior Court.
Cited 6 timesPublished122 F. Supp. 3d 438 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 10, 2015
Union v. Fed. … In the context of military boards, “decisions are subject to judicial review and can be set aside if they are arbitrary, capricious or not based on substantial evidence.” Chappell v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedHolley v. North Carolina Department of Administration
846 F. Supp. 2d 416 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 10, 2012
See Miles v. Dell, Inc., 429 F.3d 480, 485-86 (4th Cir.2005); Brown v. McLean, 159 F.3d 898, 905 (4th Cir.1998); Carter v. Ball, 33 F.3d 450, 458 (4th Cir. 1994). … John Brown E. & C., Inc., 151 F.3d 60 , 64-65 (2d Cir.1998); Williams v. Nashville Network, 132 F.3d 1123 , 1128-29 (6th Cir. 1997) (per curiam); Walker v.
Cited 29 timesPublished242 F. Supp. 721 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 11, 1965
See Hoffman v. Halden, 268 F.2d 280 , supra; and Parker v. Board of Education, 237 F.Supp. 222 (D., Md., 1965). … See Joyce v. Ferrazzi, 323 F.2d 931 (1st Cir., 1963); and Parker v. Board of Education, 237 F.Supp. 222 , supra.
Cited 7 timesPublished975 F. Supp. 799 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 6, 1997
Co. v. … Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 829 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1966 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976).
Cited 6 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 14, 2026
} ORDER WAKE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, ) Defendant. … Plaintiff “was hired by the Wake County Board of Education on July 1, 2020, as a Webster Center Multipurpose Technician[.]” [DE 21-2, § 1.1].
Cited 0 timesUnknown437 F. Supp. 796 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 10, 1977
Sabin v. … In Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972) and Perry v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedUnited States v. Onslow County
683 F. Supp. 1021 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 19, 1988
McCain v. Lybrand, 465 U.S. 236 , 104 S.Ct. 1037 , 79 L.Ed.2d 271 (1984); Canady v. Lumberton City Board of Education, 454 U.S. 957 , 102 S.Ct. 494 , 70 L.Ed.2d 373 (1981); Perkins v. … Matthews, 400 U.S. 379 , 91 S.Ct. 431 , 27 L.Ed.2d 476 (1971); Allen v. State Board of Elections, 393 U.S. 544 , 89 S.Ct. 817 , 22 L.Ed.2d 1 (1969).
Cited 5 timesPublished655 F. Supp. 59 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 18, 1986
On December 5, 1983, the Fairfax Corporation (“Fairfax”), a subsidiary of the Cameron-Brown Company (“Cameron-Brown”), entered into certain agreements with plaintiffs relating to real property known as the Cameron-Brown Building … from Cameron-Brown.
Cited 3 timesPublished959 F. Supp. 721 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 27, 1997
See Berry v. … For example, Darrah v. Missouri Highway & Transp.
Cited 6 timesPublishedOverton v. Tar Heel Farm Credit, ACA
942 F. Supp. 1066 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 30, 1996
According to the unpublished Fourth Circuit opinion 2 in Brown v. Johns Hopkins Hospital, 1995 WL 139328 , 1995 U.S.App. LEXIS 6493 (4th Cir. … In Shpargel v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedMeares v. Brunswick County, NC
615 F. Supp. 14 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 12, 1985
The Supreme Court in Moor v. … Healthy City Board of Ed. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977) found that a local school board was “more like a county or city than ... an arm of the state.”
Cited 3 timesPublished722 F. Supp. 1309 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 5, 1989
Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2705 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). Whether the plaintiff has a constitutionally protected property interest depends on state law. Bishop v. … The plaintiff relies on a “Personnel Policy” adopted by the Board of Commissioners of the Town of Emerald Isle. In Pittman v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedCleveland Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Califano
444 F. Supp. 125 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 18, 1978
Califano v. Sanders, 430 U.S. 99 , 97 S.Ct. 980 , 51 L.Ed.2d 192 (1977); Weinberg-er v. Salfi, 422 U.S. 749 , 95 S.Ct. 2457 , 45 L.Ed.2d 522 (1975). … . § 1395oo(f)(l) sets forth no requirement that a hearing be held before a final decision of the Board can be judicially reviewed. Defendants point to Califano v.
Cited 17 timesPublished
Ask Donna