Case law

Wake County Board of Education v. L.P., a minor child

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 8, 2023

Ludwig Mowinckles Rederi v. Tidewater Const. Co., 559 F.2d 928, 933 (4th Cir. 1977). … Lorsson v. Chapel Hill-Carrboro Bd. of Educ., 773 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2014).

Taylor v. Elizabeth City Pasquotank Public School Board of Education

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 12, 2023

She was politically active in the protests surrounding the April 2021 killing of Andrew Brown. On June 4, 2021, plaintiff was frightened to find a black plastic rat on her desk. … Papasan v. Allain, 478 U.S. 265, 283 (1986).

Nesmith v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n of Raleigh, North Carolina, Inc.

273 F. Supp. 502 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 3, 1967

Lynn Brown, is President of the Executive Committee of the defendant association. 3. … Prior thereto, one Wilbert V. Johnson, also a Negro, made application for membership in the Youth Athletic Club on behalf of his son. By letter dated June 30, 1965, Mr.

Wardell v. Pitt County, North Carolina

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 17, 2025

Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 (1997); Hafer v. Melo, 502 U.S. 21, 25 (1991); Kentucky v. Graham, 473 U.S. 159, 166 (1985); Monell, 436 U.S. at 690-94; King v. … Brown, 520 U.S. at 411; see Harris, 489 U.S. at 392; Riddick, 238 F.3d at 524; Carter, 164 F.3d at 218-19.

Porter v. Board of Trustees of North Carolina State University

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 17, 2022

Board of Trustees and official capacity claims Plaintiff does not appear to dispute that his claims for damages. against the Board of Trustees and the individual defendants in their official capacities are barred … Ridpath v.

North Carolina Green Party v. North Carolina State Board of Elections

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 2, 2024

PARTY, et al., ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ; ORDER NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD. … DeBauche v.

Holliday v. Long Manufacturing Co.

18 F.R.D. 45 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 29, 1955

In Waterman v. … Co. v.

Iskander v. Department of the Navy

7 F. Supp. 3d 590 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 17, 2014

Co. v. United States, 945 F.2d 765, 768 (4th Cir.1991); Adams v. Bain, 697 F.2d 1213, 1219 (4th Cir.1982). … See, e.g., Brown v. Tomlinson, 462 F.Supp.2d 16, 20-21 (D.D.C.2006). III. In sum, the court DENIES the Navy’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction [D.E. 25]. .

Kamin v. Wake County Public School System Board of Education

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 27, 2020

In the first filed action, the Wake County Board of Education seeks relief from portions of the order of a state hearing review officer. … Ludwig Mowinckles Rederi v. Tidewater Const. Co., 559 F.2d 928, 933 (4th Cir. 1977).

Riggs v. Hodges

7 F. Supp. 2d 690 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 22, 1998

See 7 U.S.C. § 1366 ; McLamb v. Pope, 657 F.2d 77, 78-79 (4th Cir.1981). The review committee’s findings of fact are conclusive if supported by substantial evidence. See 7 U.S.C. § 1366 ; McLamb, 657 F.2d at 79 . … The Supreme Court of South Carolina interpreted § 1366’s requirement of “substantial evidence” in Lee v.

North Carolina Green Party v. North Carolina State Board of Elections

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 7, 2023

Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U.S. 95, 109 (1983); see Kingdomware Techs., Inc. v. United States, 579 U.S. 162, 170 (2016); Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 17 (1998); S. Pac. Terminal Co. v. … See [D.E. 90] 8-13; Lawrence v.

Lassiter v. Taylor

152 F. Supp. 295 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 10, 1957

Guinn v. United States, 238 U.S. 347 , 35 S.Ct. 926 , 59 L.Ed. 1340 ; Myers v. Anderson, 238 U.S. 368 , 35 S.Ct. 932 , 59 L.Ed. 1349 . … Guinn v. United States, 238 U.S. 347, 360 , 35 S.Ct. 932 ; Williams v. State of Mississippi, 170 U.S. 213 , 18 S.Ct. 583 , 42 L.Ed. 1012 ; Davis v.

Voter Intergrity Project NC, Inc. v. Wake Cnty. Bd. of Elections

301 F. Supp. 3d 612 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 21, 2017

See Bellitto v. Snipes , 221 F.Supp.3d 1354 , 1360-62 (S.D. … Civil Rights Union v. Martinez-Rivera , 166 F.Supp.3d 779 , 791-93 (W.D.

Price v. Block

535 F. Supp. 1239 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 1, 1982

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). Liberty denotes the right of an individual “ ‘to engage in any of the common occupations of life.’ ” Board of Regents v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, supra at 577, 92 S.Ct. at 2709 .

Ali

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 21, 2026

Defendant North Carolina State Board of Elections filed a motion to dismiss on February 5, 2026 [DE 11]. However, plaintiff subsequently filed an amended complaint, [DE 26], rendering that motion moot. Fawzy v. … v. Dep t of Educ., 639 F.3d 91. 108 (4th Cir. 2011).

Miller v. Celebrezze

252 F. Supp. 598 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 8, 1966

Rodman, this time upon request of the State of North Carolina’s Board of Public Welfare. Dr. … Bradey v. Ribicoff, 298 F.2d 855 , supra; and Brown v. Celebrezze, 347 F.2d 227 (4th Cir., 1965). See also Allison v. Ribicoff, 307 F.2d 379 (4th Cir., 1962); but cf. Allen v. Celebrezze, 247 F.Supp. 447 (D.S.C.1965).

Willis Bros., Inc. v. Ocean Scallops, Inc.

356 F. Supp. 1151 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 15, 1972

Yates v. Brown, 275 N.C. 634 , 170 S.E.2d 477 (1965). … Yates v. Brown, supra. The Agency Agreement contains a “best efforts” provision obligating it to use its best efforts to process, package and sell all the product delivered to it by the defendant.

Nursing Registry, Inc. v. Eastern North Carolina Regional Emergency Medical Services Consortium, Inc.

959 F. Supp. 298 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 7, 1997

Four years later, in United Mine Workers v. … See Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943).

Dean v. Leake

550 F. Supp. 2d 594 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 17, 2008

Wise v. … This standard enunciated by the North Carolina Supreme Court is more restrictive than that imposed by the United States Supreme Court in Brown v.

Bradford v. Weinstein

357 F. Supp. 1127 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 30, 1973

Lewis v. Rockefeller, 305 F.Supp. 258, 259 (S.D.N.Y.1969), affirmed 431 F.2d 368 . Nor does an inmate have a constitutional right to examine his record or parole board files. Tarlton v. … An inmate has no constitutional right to have the Board of Paroles specify the reasons for which parole has been denied. Lewis v. Rockefeller, supra, and Madden v.