Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnced

1,493 results

0.82s

  • Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. v. Biodelivery Sciences International, Inc.

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 6, 2019

    On October 28, 2014, BioDelivery filed four petitions for inter partes review of the ‘167 patent with the , Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”). … See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 677-80 (2009); Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly 550 U.S. 544, 554- 63 (2007); Coleman v. Md. Court of Appeals, 626 F.3d 187, 190 (4th Cir. 2010), afPd, 566 U.S. 30 (2012); Giarratano v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lightner v. City of Wilmington, North Carolina

    498 F. Supp. 2d 802 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 30, 2007

    Pruitt v. … See Zombro v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • BKV GROUP DC, PLLC v. TREELINE ACQUISITION, LLC d/b/a/ TREELINE COMPANIES; TREELINE ACQUISITION LLC v. DISTINCTIVE LIVING DEVELOPMENT LLC, DISTINCTIVE LIVING LLC, DAVID BANTA, CHRISTOPHER HOARD, JACK BOARMAN and JOSEPH JEDLOWSKI

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 13, 2025

    Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U.S. 117, 127 (2014) (quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011)). … Ragsdale v. Kennedy, 286 N.C. 130, 138 (1974).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Clendening v. United States

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 19, 2020

    Brown, 348 U.S. 110, 112 (1954) (finding that plaintiff’s injury, permanent nerve damage as a result of a defective tourniquet applied in a veteran’s hospital while on active duty, exempt from the Feres Doctrine because … Washington v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Reynolds v. United States Government

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 21, 2023

    Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540, 555 (1994). … Helicopteros Nacionales de Colombia, S.A. v. Hall, 466 U.S. 408, 416 (1984); Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462, 472 (1985).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ostendorf v. Saul

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 25, 2020

    For example, in Reid v. Comm'r of Soc. … See, e.g., Brown v. Comm'r Soc. Sec.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brearley v. FDH Infrastructure Services LLC

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 26, 2023

    Pinney v. … Vlaming v. West Point School Board, 10 F.4th 300, 308 (4th Cir. 2021).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kerr v. Navy Federal

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 27, 2024

    See Sciacca v. Durham County Board of Education, 509 F. … Co. v. Sullivan, 526 U.S. 40, 50 (1999) (quoting Blum v. Yaretsky, 457 U.S. 991, 1002 (1982)); see also Rendell–Baker v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Harris v. Saul

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 2, 2019

    V. DISCUSSION A. … see Hines v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Burch v. NC Department of Public Safety

    158 F. Supp. 3d 449 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 19, 2016

    Hudson v. … There, the Court found- significant that “[t]here was no indication ... that the zoning board was exercising discretionary authority based on subjective, individualized determinations — at least not with regard to easement

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • United States v. Simmons

    526 F. Supp. 2d 557 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 4, 2007

    United States v. Brown, No. 94-573, 1996 WL 85127, *2 , 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3381 , slip op. at *5 (4th Cir.29 Feb. 1996) (citing *574 United States v. Sledge, 546 F.2d 1120 (4th Cir.1977)). … United States v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bryant v. Newton

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 19, 2024

    Ex. 6 at 2–3, 10), “Color: Brown, Race Biracial” (Am. Compl. Ex. 7 at 1), and Bi-Racial/Multi-Racial (Am. Compl. Ex. 6 at 10). … See Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 846-47 (4th Cir. 1985). This 19th day of November 2024. Drm boalZ Aral KIMBERIAY A.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Danzy v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 19, 2025

    Nucor Corp. v. … See Jones v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Miller v. United States

    150 F. Supp. 2d 871 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 14, 2001

    King’ board work. Mr. King testified that Ms. Dixon called him in July 1998 to inquire where her brother was being incarcerated. Mr. … Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 468 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); Vanater v. Boles, 377 F.2d 898, 900 (4th Cir.1967); Miller v. United States, 261 F.2d 546 (4th Cir.1958).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Allen v. Allen

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 31, 2025

    Brown & Root, Inc. v. Breckenridge, 211 F.3d 194, 198 (4th Cir. 2000). … Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Shock v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 5, 2024

    v. Mont. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 141 S.Ct. 1017, 1024 (2021); Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U.S. 117, 137 (2014); Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 924 (2011). … See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 677-80 (2009); Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 554-63 (2007); Coleman v. Md.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bartels v. Saber Healthcare Group, LLC

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 27, 2022

    The agreement defined basic services as the provision of “room, board, and such services as may be required for the .. . safety, good grooming, and well-being of the Resident.” … .”); Lee v. Certainteed Corp., 123 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Patterson-El v. County of Cumberland

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 7, 2024

    White v. … Brown & Root, Inc. v. Breckenridge, 211 F.3d 194, 198 (4th Cir. 2000) (quoting Johnson v. De Grandy, 512 U.S. 997, 1005-06 (1994)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kasparov, Pte Ltd. v. Zacherl

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 5, 2024

    □ See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 677-80 (2009); Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 US. 544, 554-63 (2007); Coleman v. Md. … Aug. 24, 2021) (unpublished); Springs v. Mayer Brown, LLP, No. 3:09-CV-352, 2012 WL 366283, at *9 (WDNC. Jan. 27, 2012) (unpublished).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mack v. East Carolina University

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 29, 2022

    Plaintiff informed Mountz that the students were not eligible according to the guidelines and rules of Panhellenic to run for executive board or Pi Chi positions due to their inactive status on campus, but Mountz only … See Brown v. Inst. For Fam. Centered Servs., Inc., 394 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.