Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

9,157 results

0.51s

  • Brown v. Chatham County Board of Education

    187 N.C. App. 274 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 20, 2007

    See Koufman v. … See Bruce-Terminix Co. v. Zurich Ins. Co., 130 N.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hunt v. Hunt

    117 N.C. App. 280 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 6, 1994

    Spain v. Brown, 236 N.C. *283 355, 357, 72 S.E.2d 918, 919 (1952). What is excluded from a reply is a new cause of action or other matter beyond the scope of the new matter raised in the answer. Id. … Beal v. Dellinger, 38 N.C. App. 732 , 248 S.E.2d 775 (1978).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • EHP Land Co. v. Bosher

    785 S.E.2d 187 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 5, 2016

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Board of Transportation v. Brown

    34 N.C. App. 266 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 19, 1977

    Brown testified, in pertinent part, and the court ruled, as follows: “[A]nd there’s going to be noise, there’s going to be damage — Mr. SALLEY: Objection; motion to strike. The COURT: Objection sustáined. … In Highway Comm. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • McConnell v. McConnell

    151 N.C. App. 622 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 6, 2002

    Browning v. Helff, 136 N.C. App. 420, 423 , 524 S.E.2d 95, 97-98 (2000) (citation omitted). … Though plaintiff relies on Brewer v. Brewer, 139 N.C. App. 222 , 533 S.E.2d 541 (2000) and Browning v. Helff, 136 N.C.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • TIMBER RIDGE v. Caldwell

    195 N.C. App. 452 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 17, 2009

    Goler Metropolitan Apartments, Inc. v. Williams, 43 N.C. App. 648, 650 , 260 S.E.2d 146, 148 (1979). … Lincoln Terrace Assocs., Ltd. v. Kelly, 179 N.C. App. 621, 623 , 635 S.E.2d 434, 436 (2006) (quotations omitted). Here, no copy of the lease agreement was submitted into evidence.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Hatfield v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance Co.

    85 N.C. App. 438 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 5, 1987

    In Andrews v. … In East Side Builders v. Brown, 234 N.C. 517 , 67 S.E. 2d 489 (1951), the doctrine of laches is stated as follows: “Laches is such delay in enforcing one’s rights as works disadvantage to another. ...

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Estate of Nelson Ex Rel. Brewer v. Nelson

    179 N.C. App. 166 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 15, 2006

    Publishing Co. v. Board of Education, 29 N.C. App. 37, 47 , 223 S.E.2d 580, 586 (1976). Good Hope Hosp., Inc. v. N.C. Health and Human Servs., 175 N.C. App. 309, 311-12 , 623 S.E.2d 315, 318 (2006). … This statute abrogated the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Brown, which held an equitable distribution claim *171 abated upon the death of a party. 353 N.C. 220, 227 , 539 S.E.2d 621, 625 (2000).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    791 S.E.2d 283 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 2, 2016

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    47 N.C. App. 323 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 17, 1980

    Williams v. Bray, 273 N.C. 198 , 159 S.E. 2d 556 (1968); Sherwood v. Sherwood, 29 N.C. App. 112 , 223 S.E. 2d 509 (1976). … General Specialties Co. v. Teer Co., 41 N.C.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    72 N.C. App. 332 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 15, 1985

    Brown’s separate property. … Brown is entitled to the pension fund as his separate property. See Allen v. Allen, 584 S.W. 2d 599 (Ky. Ct. App. 1979). The trial court, therefore, erred in including the pension funds as marital property.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Ball v. Maynard

    184 N.C. App. 99 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 19, 2007

    Dishner Developers, Inc. v. Brown, 145 N.C. App. 375, 378 , 549 S.E.2d 904, 906 , aff’d per curiam, 354 N.C. 569 , 557 S.E.2d 528 (2001). … Munchak Corp. v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    77 N.C. App. 206 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 1, 1985

    Brown and third parties. … See Terry’s Floor Fashions v. Murray, 61 N.C. App. 569 , 300 S.E. 2d 888 (1983). Plaintiff also contends that her alleged right to property titled in the names of Paul G. Brown, his ex-wife, and Paul G.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    21 N.C. App. 435 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 1, 1974

    Justice Black said, in Conley v. … Kirkham v. Kirkham,, 335 S.W. 2d 393 (Tex. Civ. App. 1960); Mora v. Mora, 429 S.W. 2d 660 (Tex. Civ. *439 App. 1968); Busby v. Busby, 457 S.W. 2d 551 (Texas 1970). In Miser v. Miser, 475 S.W. 2d 597 (Tex. Civ.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    112 N.C. App. 15 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 21, 1993

    Cable v. Cable, 76 N.C. App. 134 , 331 S.E.2d 765 , disc. rev. denied, 315 N.C. 182 , 337 S.E.2d 856 (1985); Beightol v. Beightol, 90 N.C. … Latham v. Latham, 178 N.C. 12 , 100 S.E. 131 (1919).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    171 N.C. App. 358 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 5, 2005

    Montez Brown in the amount of $13,178.48; 2. … Hildebrand v. Vanderbilt, 147 N.C. 640 , 642, 61 S.E. 620, 629 (1908).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • L.I.C. Assocs. I v. Brown

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 2, 2024

    I V. BROWN Opinion of the Court there is no longer a live issue. … I V. BROWN Opinion of the Court based upon common law1 or former North Carolina statutes. See, e.g., Dulin v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    666 S.E.2d 217 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 16, 2008

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    654 S.E.2d 832 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 15, 2008

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Fleming

    247 N.C. App. 812 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 7, 2016

    State v. Stewart, 231 N.C. App. 134, 141, 750 S.E.2d 875, 880 (2013) (citation omitted). See also State v. Billings, 104 N.C. … See also Abels v. Renfro Corp., 126 N.C.

    Cited 13 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.