Case law

Bullington v. North Carolina State Board of Examiners in Optometry

79 N.C. App. 750 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 18, 1986

The subpoena authority of the Board is limited to “any hearing, investigation or proceeding conducted by it.” G.S. 90-117.4. … The authority of the Board to enforce its subpoena power necessarily must be decided on a case-by-case basis.

Crosby v. Bowers

87 N.C. App. 338 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 20, 1987

Kelly v. International Harvester Co., 278 N.C. 153 , 179 S.E. 2d 396 (1971). … Coleman v. Shirlen, 53 N.C. App. 573 , 281 S.E. 2d 431 (1981).

Board of Education of the Hickory Administrative School Unit v. Seagle

120 N.C. App. 566 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 7, 1995

Dare County Board of Education v. Sakaria, 118 N.C. App. 609, 613 , 456 S.E.2d 842, 845 (1995). … (quoting Board of Educ. v. Allen, 243 N.C. 520, 523 , 91 S.E.2d 180, 183 (1956)). Defendants argue that the recent case of Dare County Board of Education v.

Habitat for Humanity of Moore County, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners

187 N.C. App. 764 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 18, 2007

Aubin v. Susi, 149 N.C. App. 320, 324 , 560 S.E.2d 875, 878 (2002) (citation omitted). As the party invoking jurisdiction, plaintiffs have the burden of establishing standing. Neuse River Found. v. … This Court in Street v.

Kiddie Korner Day Schools, Inc. v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education

55 N.C. App. 134 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1981

Lane v. Stanly, 65 N.C. 153, 157-58 (1871). Further, in Board of Education v. … Coggins v. Board of Education, 223 N.C. 763 , 28 S.E. 2d 527 (1944).

Cameron ex rel. Cameron v. Wake County Board of Education

36 N.C. App. 547 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 6, 1978

This Court held in Church v. Board of Education, 31 N.C. … Board of Alcoholic Control, 258 N.C. 282 , 128 S.E. 2d 587 (1962); Employment Security Commission v. Kermon, 232 N.C. 342 , 60 S.E. 2d 580 (1950); Stevenson v. N.C. Department of Insurance, 31 N.C.

Martin Marietta Corp. v. Forsyth County Zoning Board of Adjustment

65 N.C. App. 316 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 6, 1983

Gower v. Insurance Co., 281 N.C. 577, 580 , 189 S.E. 2d 165, 167 (1972); see also Gaskins v. Insurance Co., 260 N.C. 122, 124 , 131 S.E. 2d 872, 873 (1963). … Swenson v. Assurance Co., 33 N.C. App. 458, 465 , 235 S.E. 2d 793, 797 (1977). “When a court has no authority to act, its acts are void.” Russell v. Manufacturing Co., 266 N.C. 531, 534 , 146 S.E. 2d 459, 461 (1966).

White v. North Carolina State Board of Examiners of Practicing Psychologists

97 N.C. App. 144 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 6, 1990

Thompson v. Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406, 410 , 233 S.E.2d 538, 541 (1977) (citations omitted). … Lackey v. Dept. of Human Resources, 306 N.C. 231, 238 , 293 S.E.2d 171, 176 (1982) (citations omitted). A. The first incident before the Board involves Dr.

Virmani v. Presbyterian Health Services Corp.

127 N.C. App. 71 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1997

Brown, M.D., (Brown) the new OB/GYN chairman. … Warzynski v. Empire Comfort Sys., 102 N.C. App. 222, 231 , 401 S.E.2d 801, 806 (1991).

Bank of N.C. v. 15 River Project, LLC

801 S.E.2d 390 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 20, 2017

Trought v. Richardson

78 N.C. App. 758 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 21, 1986

In determining whether the plaintiff had a claim we have to assume that the reasons given by Brown and Richardson to the other employees were true. … Walker v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., supra.

Farrell Ex Rel. Farrell v. Transylvania County Board of Education

194 N.C. App. 159 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 2, 2008

In Mullis v. Sechrest, 126 N.C. … In Kitchin v. Halifax Cty., 192 N.C.

Cannon v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Wilmington

65 N.C. App. 44 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 15, 1983

The duty of the Superior Court in reviewing the decision of a town board sitting as a quasi-judicial body was succinctly enunciated by Justice Carlton in Concrete Co. v. … Examination of the Board’s conclusions clearly reveals that the Board did not base its decision on the ground *49 that Mr. Cannon’s growth in business amounted to expansion of a nonconforming use.

Weaverville Partners, LLC v. Town of Weaverville Zoning Board of Adjustment

188 N.C. App. 55 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 15, 2008

“A legislative body such as the Board, when granting or denying a conditional use permit, sits as a quasi-judicial body.” Sun Suites Holdings, L.L.C. v. Board of Aldermen of Garner, 139 N.C. … Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, 284 N.C. 458, 468 , 202 S.E.2d 129, 136 (1974). Substantial evidence has been defined as: Substantial evidence is more than a mere scintilla.

Morris Communications Corp. v. City of Bessemer City Zoning Board of Adjustment

202 N.C. App. 631 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 2, 2010

judgment for that of the [Board]. … V.

Safety Mutual Casualty Corp. v. Spears, Barnes, Baker, Wainio, Brown & Whaley

104 N.C. App. 467 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 5, 1991

Hardbarger v. Deal, 258 N.C. 31, 35 , 127 S.E.2d 771, 774 (1962) (quoting Rochester v. Tulp, 54 Wash. 2d 71 , 337 P.2d 1062 (1959)). … Barnhardt v. Morrison, 178 N.C. 563, 568 , 101 S.E. 218, 221 (1919) (quoting Adams and Freese Co. v. Kenoyer, 16 L.R.A. (N.S.) 683).

Appalachian Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Town of Boone Board of Adjustment

128 N.C. App. 137 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1997

CG & T Corp. v. Bd. of Adjustment of Wilmington, 105 N.C. App. 32, 36 , 411 S.E.2d 655, 658 (1992) (citing Jennewein v. City Council, 62 N.C. … Coastal Ready-Mix v. Board of Com’rs, 299 N.C. 620, 626 , 265 S.E.2d 379, 383 , reh’g denied, 300 N.C. 562 , 270 S.E.2d 106 (1980).

Francine Delany New School for Children, Inc. v. Asheville City Board of Education

150 N.C. App. 338 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 21, 2002

Brown v. Flowe, 349 N.C. 520 , 507 S.E.2d 894 (1998). … Brown, 349 N.C. at 522 , 507 S.E.2d at 895 . If the language of a statute is unambiguous on its face, then we must construe the statute according to its plain meaning. Lutz v.

Northeast Motor Co. v. N. C. State Board of Alcoholic Control

35 N.C. App. 536 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 7, 1978

San-tobello v. New York, supra. And the same is true even when the promises are not within the power of the prosecutor to make, and hence, are unfulfillable. Palermo v. … Santobello v. New York, supra. Only he can now be heard to complain. In the lower court’s order affirming respondent Board’s suspension of petitioner’s ABC permits, we find no error. Affirmed.

Robertson v. Zoning Board of Adjustment for the City of Charlotte

167 N.C. App. 531 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 21, 2004

V. … Craver v. Board of Adjustment, 267 N.C. 40, 43 , 147 S.E.2d 599, 601 (1966). Relying on Refining Co. v.