Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncctapp

9,157 results

1.24s

  • Peach v. City of High Point

    199 N.C. App. 359 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 1, 2009

    Robertson v. City of High Point, 129 N.C. App. 88, 91 , 497 S.E.2d 300, 302 (citing Lea Co. v. N.C. … Board of Transportation, 308 N.C. 603, 629 , 304 S.E.2d 164, 181 (1983)), disc. review denied, 348 N.C. 500 , 510 S.E.2d 654 (1998).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In re: H.B.D., R.E.D.

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 18, 2026

    Matter of R.G.L., 379 N.C. 452, 456, 866 S.E.2d 401, 408 (2021) (citation omitted); see Taney v. Brown, 262 N.C. 438, 443, 137 S.E.2d 827, 830 (1964).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Griffin v. Absolute Fire Control

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 7, 2020

    Nale v. Ethan Allen, 199 N.C. App. 511, 514, 682 S.E.2d 231, 234 (2009). The Commission’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. Gregory v. W.A. Brown & Sons, 212 N.C. … Comm’n v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jordan v. Earthgrains Companies, Inc.

    155 N.C. App. 762 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 21, 2003

    In Simms v. Prudential Life Ins. Co. of Am., 140 N.C. … APAC-Carolina, Inc. v. Greensboro-High Point Airport Authority, 110 N.C. App. 664, 680 , 431 S.E.2d 508, 517 (1993).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Lopp v. Anderson

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 20, 2016

    Shore v. Brown, 324 N.C. 427, 428, 378 S.E.2d 778, 779 (1989) (citation omitted) (“If the granting of summary judgment can be sustained on any grounds, it should be affirmed on appeal. … ANDERSON & LOPP V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • DeBRUHL v. DeBRUHL

    168 N.C. App. 595 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 15, 2005

    Plaintiff filed a complaint on 28 January 1999 seeking, among other things, divorce from bed and board, post separation support and alimony, child custody, and child support. … Defendant cites Wells v. Wells, 132 N.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re M.L.T.H.

    200 N.C. App. 476 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 3, 2009

    State v. Leach, 166 N.C. … In State v. Jones, 147 N.C.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Shelton

    263 N.C. App. 681 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 5, 2019

    Factual and Procedural Background STATE V. … State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179, 204, 358 S.E.2d 1, 18, cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970, 98 L. Ed. 2d 406 (1987).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Simpson v. Simpson

    29 N.C. App. 14 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 17, 1976

    Peele v. Finch, 284 N.C. 375 , 200 S.E. 2d 635 (1973) ; Stoney v. MacDougall, 28 N.C. App. 178 , 220 S.E. 2d 368 (1975). We find nothing in the devise made by the will of L. E.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Thompson v. Cranfill, Sumner, & Hartzog

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 7, 2025

    Gore v. -6- THOMPSON V. … Cole is board certified and has practiced as an internist for 21 years. In the 2019 home modification litigation, Dr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • KHOMYAK EX REL. KHOMYAK v. Meek

    214 N.C. App. 54 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 2, 2011

    See Morgan v. Steiner, 173 N.C. App. 577, 579 , 619 S.E.2d 516, 518 (2005); Cosentino v. Weeks, 160 N.C. App. 511, 513 , 586 S.E.2d 787, 788 (2003). *57 However, most recently, in Peters v. Pennington, _ N.C. … (quoting Lutz v. Board of Education, 282 N.C. 208 , 219, 192 S.E.2d 463 , 471 (1972) (citation omitted))).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. Goel

    146 N.C. App. 137 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 18, 2001

    Five or six accountants sitting on the board of Imperial’s parent company reviewed and approved the product pro forma. … In Newsome v. N.C. State Bd. of Elections, 105 N.C.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Robinson v. Robinson

    210 N.C. App. 319 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 15, 2011

    order for payment for the support and maintenance of a spouse or former spouse, periodically or in a lump sum, for a specified or for an indefinite term, ordered in an action for divorce, whether absolute or from bed and board … See Haddon v. Haddon, 42 N.C.

    Cited 52 timesPublished
  • Sears Roebuck and Co. v. Avery

    163 N.C. App. 207 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 16, 2004

    Sciences, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior Univ., 489 U.S. 468, 479 , 103 L. Ed. 2d 488, 500 , 109 S. … .”); Floss v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Beneficial Mortgage Co. of North Carolina, Inc. v. Barrington & Jones Law Firm, P.A.

    164 N.C. App. 41 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 4, 2004

    See Sikes v. … See Sprouse v. North River Ins. Co., 81 N.C.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Beck

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 6, 2021

    STATE V. … ¶ 10 Around the same time, a student at Appalachian State University, Ashley Hickman (“Hickman”), was riding a bus from campus when two men abruptly boarded the bus at an intersection.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cleveland Construction, Inc. v. Ellis-Don Construction, Inc.

    210 N.C. App. 522 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 5, 2011

    Shore v. Brown, 324 N.C. 427, 428 , 378 S.E.2d 778, 779 (1989). The trial court’s entry of partial summary judgment on CCI’s claims is, consequently, affirmed. … See Potter v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Taylor v. Myers

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 21, 2026

    - 11 - TAYLOR V. MYERS Opinion of the Court clear showing of abuse of discretion.” Browning v. … In Price v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State v. Crompton

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 17, 2020

    Relying on State v. Williams, 243 N.C. App. 198, 776 S.E.2d 741 (2015), and State v. Melton, 258 N.C. … State v. Hunnicutt, 226 N.C. App. 348, 355, 740 S.E.2d 906, 911 (2013) (citing State v. Brown, 222 N.C. App. 738, 731 S.E.2d 530 (2012); State v. High, 183 N.C. App. 443, 645 S.E.2d 394 (2007); State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Southland Nat'l Ins. Corp. v. Lindberg

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 20, 2023

    The NHC would be managed by an independent board of qualified individuals whose primary goal would be protecting the best interests of Plaintiffs’ policyholders. … See Hutchins v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.