Case law

Berens v. Berens

247 N.C. App. 12 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 19, 2016

BERENS V. … Brown v. Am. Partners Fed. Credit Union, 183 N.C. App. 529, 536, 645 S.E.2d 117, 122 (2007); Harris v. Harris, 50 N.C. App. 305, 316, 274 S.E.2d 489, 495 (1981).

Gibson v. Lopez

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 6, 2020

Liner v. Brown, 117 N.C. App. 44, 49, 449 S.E.2d 905, 907 (1994) (internal marks and citation omitted). … In State v.

Marley v. Graper

135 N.C. App. 423 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 2, 1999

Additionally, the witness testified that Graper’s care of Marley “met accepted standards for the practice of plastic surgery by a board certified plastic and reconstructive [surgeon].” … See U.S. v.

State v. Stephen

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 31, 2024

State v. Gray, 259 N.C. App. 351, 354, 815 S.E.2d 736, 739 (2018). … In Figueroa, the defendant was charged with several drug- related offenses after a brown paper bag—containing a white, powdery substance suspected to be methamphetamine—was recovered from the defendant’s vehicle and sent

T&A Amusements, LLC v. McCrory

251 N.C. App. 904 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 7, 2017

T & A AMUSEMENTS, LLC V. … See Sharpe v.

Ajayi v. Seaman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 20, 2024

In Baker v. … See Brown v. Kindred Nursing Ctrs. E., L.L.C., 364 N.C. 76, 84, 692 S.E.2d 87, 92 (2010) (explaining that the rules apply equally to all parties, notwithstanding representation status); Bledsole v.

State v. Bell

164 N.C. App. 83 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 4, 2004

See State v. … State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563 , *94 566, 313 S.E.2d 585, 587 (1984).

State v. Hogan

234 N.C. App. 218 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 3, 2014

See State v. … Brown, 937 F.2d 68, 70 (2d Cir. 1991) (“[U]nder New Jersey law, offenses  -17- punishable by more than one year in prison constitute common-law felonies.”); Kaplowitz v.

Patrick v. RONALD WILLIAMS, PA

102 N.C. App. 355 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 2, 1991

Brown v. Lyons, 93 N.C. App. 453, 458 , 378 S.E.2d 243, 246 (1989); accord, Rollins v. Junior Miller Roofing Co., 55 N.C. App. 158, 162 , 284 S.E.2d 697, 701 (1981); and Mortgage Co. v. Real Estate, Inc., 39 N.C. … Citing Rorrer v.

Dalenko v. Collier

191 N.C. App. 713 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 5, 2008

Co., *720 LLC v. White Oak Transp. … Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc., 898 F.2d. 882 (2nd Cir. 1990). Whether a private citizen is clothed with judicial immunity is based on a functionality test. Burns v. Reed, 500 U.S. 478, 499-500 , 114 L.

Painter v. City of MT

823 S.E.2d 583 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 5, 2019

considered on the merits in the course of deciding an immunity-related interlocutory appeal' nor 'recognized the existence of a substantial right to have multiple issues addressed in the course of an immunity-related appeal.' " Brown … v.

Buckingham v. Buckingham

134 N.C. App. 82 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 6, 1999

The parties separated on 5 November 1996, and plaintiff filed a verified complaint for divorce from bed and board and motion for custody on 6 November 1996. … Wachovia Bank v. Bounous, 53 N.C. App. 700 , 281 S.E.2d 712 (1981). See Walters v. Walters, 307 N.C. 381 , 298 S.E.2d 338 (1983); Ross v. Voiers, 127 N.C. App. 415 , 490 S.E.2d 244 (1997).

Department of Transportation v. Tilley

136 N.C. App. 370 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 18, 2000

Power Co. v. Ham House, Inc., 43 N.C. App. 308, 312 , 258 S.E.2d 815, 819 (1979). An expert is not restricted to any one specific measure or calculation. See Board of Transportation v. … Power Co. v. Winebarger, 300 N.C. 57, 65 , 265 S.E.2d 227, 232 (1980). Whether the properties are sufficiently similar is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court. City of Winston-Salem v.

State v. Coppage

94 N.C. App. 630 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 18, 1989

See State v. … Ill The district attorney made the following statement to the jury in his final jury argument: Now, this psychiatrist can put this label up on the board, you ever hear of this?

Carolina Water Service, Inc. of North Carolina v. Town of Atlantic Beach

121 N.C. App. 23 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1995

See Embree Construction Group v. … More recently, in Madison Cablevision v.

In Re TK

613 S.E.2d 739 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 21, 2005

Scott v. Scott, 157 N.C.App. 382, 385 , 579 S.E.2d 431, 433 (2003); see also Browning v. Helff, 136 N.C.App. 420, 423 , 524 S.E.2d 95, 97-98 (2000). … In Moore v.

Hayes v. Town of Fairmont

167 N.C. App. 522 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 21, 2004

In addition, the North Carolina Supreme Court in Thrash v. … In R.R. v.

Freese v. Smith

110 N.C. App. 28 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 4, 1993

Snead v. Holloman, 101 N.C. App. 462 , 400 S.E.2d 91 (1991). … In the present matter, defendant served as both a director and as Chairman of the Board of Directors. As such, defendant was under a statutory mandate to act in good faith and not to engage in any self dealing.

Dalton v. Dalton

808 S.E.2d 926 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 16, 2018

Plaintiff filed a complaint for divorce from bed and board, temporary joint custody, equitable distribution, and child support on 24 October 2012. Plaintiff also sought possession of the marital home. … In Lund v. Lund this Court held the language of N.C. Gen.

State v. Campbell

257 N.C. App. 739 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 6, 2018

The general supervisory authority under which the Supreme Court acted in Brown is currently embodied in N.C. R. App. P. … The Gayton-Barbosa Court noted that “the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown suggests that fatal variances of the type present here are sufficiently serious to justify the exercise of our authority under N.C. R. App.