Case law

Davis v. Davis

58 N.C. App. 25 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 6, 1982

See Eggleston v. Eggleston, supra; Reddington v. Thomas, supra. … Board of Transportation v. Rand, 299 N.C. 476 , 263 S.E. 2d 565 (1980); Rector v. James, 41 N.C. App. 267 , 254 S.E. 2d 633 (1979).

State v. Streater

673 S.E.2d 365 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 3, 2009

Brown's statement was plain error." (citations omitted)), disc. review denied, 356 N.C. 173 , 567 S.E.2d 144 (2002); State v. … State v.

Toney v. Toney

72 N.C. App. 30 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 18, 1984

Montgomery v. Montgomery, 32 N.C. App. 154 , 231 S.E. 2d 26 (1977). … Carter v. Carter, 232 N.C. 614, 616 , 61 S.E. 2d 711, 713 (1950). See also Bethea v. Bethea, 43 N.C. App. 372 , 258 S.E. 2d 796 (1979), disc. rev. denied, 299 N.C. 119 , 261 S.E. 2d 922 (1980).

The NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR v. Ethridge

188 N.C. App. 653 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 19, 2008

Rather, “the whole record rule requires the court, in determining the substantiality of evidence supporting the Board’s decision, to take into account whatever in the record fairly detracts from the weight of the Board’s … V.

Okwara v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.

136 N.C. App. 587 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 15, 2000

In Hensley v. … Munson v. Milwaukee Board of School Directors, 969 F.2d 266 (7th Cir. 1992); see also Hoffine v. Brogan, 1998 WL 1118672 (S.D.Cal 1998); Kennedy v. McCarty, 803 F.Supp. 1470 (S.D Ind. 1992).

Hill v. Hill

142 N.C. App. 524 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 3, 2001

The evidence establishes that Hill was the Corporation’s sole stockholder and sole member of its board of directors. … Contractors, Inc. v. Cumberland County Board of Educ., 122 N.C.

State v. Moore

103 N.C. App. 87 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 4, 1991

State v. … State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 571 , 313 S.E.2d 585, 590 (1984).

State v. Hayes

130 N.C. App. 154 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 21, 1998

State v. Brown, 339 N.C. 426, 438 , 451 S.E.2d 181, 189 (1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 825 , 133 L. Ed. 2d 46 (1995). … See State v. Roten, 115 N.C. App. 118, 122 , 443 S.E.2d 794, 796 (1994); State v. Brown, 117 N.C. App. 239, 241 , 450 S.E.2d 538, 540 (1994), disc. review denied, 340 N.C. 115 , 456 S.E.2d 320 (1995).

State v. Jimenez

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 15, 2015

In State v. Brown, 211 N.C. … See Brown, 211 N.C.

Smith v. Cregan

178 N.C. App. 519 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 18, 2006

Lutz v. Board of Education, 282 N.C. 208 , 219, 192 S.E.2d 463 , 471 (1972) (citation omitted). If adopted, defendants’ strained reading of sections 6-1 and 7A-305 would have the effect of eliminating section 6-20. … Compare Department of Transp. v. Charlotte Area Mfd. Housing, Inc., 160 N.C.

State v. Lucas

234 N.C. App. 247 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 3, 2014

State v. Brown, ___ N.C. App. ___, ___, 732 S.E.2d 584, 586-87 (2012); N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-51 (2013). … In State v.

Woodard v. CLEVELAND COUNTY

202 N.C. App. 586 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 16, 2010

On 2 November 2005, the Cleveland County Board of Commissioners ("the Commissioners") approved an ordinance authorizing McCarter to demolish the Kellum Drive properties because they violated portions of the Cleveland County … In McCoy v.

North Carolina State Bar v. Gilbert

189 N.C. App. 320 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 18, 2008

White v. Consolidated Planning, Inc., 166 N.C. App. 283, 305 , 603 S.E.2d 147, 162 (2004) (quoting Friedland v. Gales, 131 N.C. … Sharpe v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 62 N.C. App. 564, 565 , 302 S.E.2d 893, 894 (quoting Allgood v.

Scott v. North Carolina Department of Crime Control & Public Safety

222 N.C. App. 125 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 7, 2012

Concrete Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 299 N.C. 620, 629 , 265 S.E.2d 379, 385 (1980) (citation omitted). “The interpretation of a statute given by the agency charged with carrying it out is entitled to great weight.” … Co. v. Jaguar Cars, Inc., 95 N.C.

State v. White

101 N.C. App. 593 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 19, 1991

State v. Benson, 323 N.C. 318 , 372 S.E.2d 517 (1988). See also State v. … In State v.

State v. Aldridge

139 N.C. App. 706 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 29, 2000

Deputy Gerald Hicks testified that when he arrived at the residence, he noticed the defendant was wearing brown shorts, no shirt or shoes, and had blood on his chest, hands, arms and legs. … See State v. Wilson, 106 N.C. App. 342, 348 , 416 S.E.2d 603, 607 (1992); State v. Frazier, 344 N.C. 611, 615 , 476 S.E.2d 297, 299 (1996).

State v. Buck

187 N.C. App. 813 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 18, 2007

State v. McNeill, 346 N.C. 233, 239 , 485 S.E.2d 284, 288 (1997). … Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 566 , 313 S.E.2d 585, 587 (1984).

In Re TAS

213 N.C. App. 273 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 19, 2011

Board of Education v. Earls, 536 U.S. 822 , 122 S.Ct. 2559 , 153 L.Ed.2d 735 (2002), extended this holding to all students participating in extracurricular activities. … The Vernonia test was applied to a suspicionless search in Board of Education v. Earls, 536 U.S. 822 , 122 S.Ct. 2559 , 153 L.Ed.2d 735 (2002).

Coastal Conservation Ass'n v. State of N.C.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 6, 2022

BROWN; JUDITH C. BULLOCK; WILLIAM L. BYRD, JR.; JOHNNY L. CANUP; MICHAEL D. CARTER; WILLIE T. CLOSS, JR.; KENNETH D. COOPER, JR.; L. AVERY CORNING, IV; PAUL N. COX; BENJAMIN M. CURRIN; DANIEL E. DAWSON; MARY F. … N.C. 761, 785, 413 S.E.2d 276, 291 (1992).2 Since 2 We are cognizant of the United States Supreme Court’s recent discussion summarizing its own history of the doctrine of sovereign immunity in Franchise Tax Board

Wall v. AutoMoney

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 19, 2022

Brown, Faucher, Peraldo & Benson, PLLC, by James R. Faucher and Jeffrey K. Peraldo, for plaintiffs-appellees. Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP, by Michael Montecalvo and Scott D. … A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919, 180 L. Ed. 2d 796, 803 (2011)). Specific jurisdiction “covers defendants less intimately connected with a State, but  WALL V.