Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncctapp

9,157 results

1.25s

  • Tuckett v. Guerrier

    149 N.C. App. 405 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 19, 2002

    Keech v. Hendricks, 141 N.C. App. 649, 653 , 540 S.E.2d 71, 75 (2000) (quoting Creech v. Melnik, 347 N.C. 520, 528 , 495 S.E.2d 907, 913 (1998)). … Levi v. Mathews, 145 F. 152, 157 (4th Cir. 1906) (citing Smith v. Ingram, 130 N.C. 100 , 40 S.E. 984 (1902) and Drake v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Archer v. Rockingham County

    144 N.C. App. 550 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 3, 2001

    See White v. … See Prichard v.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Smith v. ASSOCIATION FOR RETARDED CITIZENS FOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT SERV.

    331 S.E.2d 324 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 2, 1985

    In Hobby & Son v. … In Higgins v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Appeal of HPB Enterprises

    179 N.C. App. 199 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 15, 2006

    However, if a petitioner contends the board’s decision was based on an error of law, de novo review is proper. . . . … Hilliard v. N.C. Dep’t of Corr., 173 N.C. App. 594, 598 , 620 S.E.2d 14, 17-18 (2005).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hurley v. Miller

    113 N.C. App. 658 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 1, 1994

    See Lowe v. … Radford v. Norris., 74 N.C. App. 87, 88-89 , 327 S.E.2d 620, 621-22 , disc. review denied, 314 N.C. 117 , 332 S.E.2d 483 (1985) (citing Cunningham v. Brown, 62 N.C.

    Reversed on other grounds by Hurley v. Miller, 339 N.C. 601 (1995)Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. Braswell

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 21, 2026

    Taylor Browne in Johnston County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 16 October 2025. Attorney General Jeff Jackson, by Assistant Attorney General Reginaldo E. … State v. Morgan, 183 N.C. App. 160, 168, 645 S.E.2d 93, 100 (2007) (citing State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jackson v. Carland

    192 N.C. App. 432 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 2, 2008

    Brown v. Moore, 286 N.C. 664, 673 , 213 S.E.2d 342, 348-49 (1975) (citations omitted)). On review, we hold defendant has failed to show the trial court’s decision lacked a basis in reason. … Loy v. Martin, 156 N.C.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Scott v. North Carolina Department of Crime Control & Public Safety

    222 N.C. App. 125 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 7, 2012

    Concrete Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 299 N.C. 620, 629 , 265 S.E.2d 379, 385 (1980) (citation omitted). “The interpretation of a statute given by the agency charged with carrying it out is entitled to great weight.” … Co. v. Jaguar Cars, Inc., 95 N.C.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Hinton

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 4, 2026

    Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 566, 313 S.E.2d 585, 587 (1984) (citation omitted). … State v. Abraham, 338 N.C. 315, 328, 451 S.E.2d 131, 137 (1994).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State v. Estes

    186 N.C. App. 364 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 16, 2007

    State v. Francis, 341 N.C. 156, 161 , 459 S.E.2d 269, 272 (1995). … V.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Thornton v. C & J Carriage House

    795 S.E.2d 155 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 17, 2017

    In April 2013, defendants obtained a peer review of the rhizotomy recommendation from board-certified neurologist Dr. … See Perkins v. U.S. Airways , 177 N.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jenkins v. Easco Aluminum Corp.

    142 N.C. App. 71 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 6, 2001

    Lineback v. Wake County Board of Commissioners, 126 N.C. App. 678, 680 , 486 S.E.2d 252, 254 (1997). … Allen v. K-Mart, 137 N.C.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • State v. Jimenez

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 15, 2015

    In State v. Brown, 211 N.C. … See Brown, 211 N.C.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • McGrady v. Olsten Corp.

    159 N.C. App. 643 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 5, 2003

    Lineback v. Wake County Board of Commissioners, 126 N.C. App. 678, 680 , 486 S.E.2d 252, 254 (1997) (citation omitted). … McBride v. Peony Corp., 84 N.C. App. 221, 226-27 , 352 S.E.2d 236, 240 (1987) (emphasis added) (quoting Kiger v. Service Co., 260 N.C. 760, 762 , 133 S.E.2d 702, 704 (1963), and Guest v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Com'r of Ins. v. State Ex Rel. Atty. Gen.

    19 N.C. App. 263 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 29, 1973

    Utilities Commission v. Trucking Co., 223 N.C. 687 , 690, 28 S. E.2d 201, 203 . … which responsible persons are *579 accustomed to rely in the conduct of insurance affairs.'" 278 N.C. at 318 , 180 S.E. 2d at 166 , quoting Rules and Regulations for Public Hearings, promulgated by the Insurance Advisory Board

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Broderick v. Broderick

    175 N.C. App. 501 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 17, 2006

    See Walker v. … But see Coley v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. McNeil

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 19, 2014

    State v. Brown, -6- 80 N.C. App. 307, 311, 342 S.E.2d 42, 44 (1986). … State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 566, 313 S.E.2d 585, 587 (1984).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • In Re RPM

    616 S.E.2d 627 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 16, 2005

    Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 566 , 313 S.E.2d 585, 587 (1984) (citing State v. Smith, 300 N.C. 71, 78 , 265 S.E.2d 164, 169 (1980)). … See State v. Revels, 227 N.C. 34, 36 , 40 S.E.2d 474, 475 (1946); State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hawkins v. General Electric Co.

    199 N.C. App. 245 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 18, 2009

    Sherertz”) a board certified occupational dermatologist with significant experience with contact dermatitis. Dr. … Our Supreme Court has held, in Rutledge v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Sellars

    222 N.C. App. 245 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 7, 2012

    In the 1998 case of State v. … In State v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.