Case law

State v. Smith

121 N.C. App. 41 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1995

In Course v. … State v.

State v. Spencer

192 N.C. App. 143 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 19, 2008

See State v. … State v.

Boney Publishers, Inc. v. Burlington City Council

151 N.C. App. 651 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 6, 2002

See Publishing Co. v. Board of Education, 29 N.C. … Contractors v. Cumberland County Bd. of Education, 122 N.C.

Williams v. Wilson Cnty. Bd. of Educ.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 7, 2014

TA-22046 WILSON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant. … The Wilson County School Board appealed to the Full Commission (the Commission).

Matter of Will of Maynard

64 N.C. App. 211 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 4, 1983

Britt v. Allen, 291 N.C. 630 , 231 S.E. 2d 607 (1977); In re Brown, 23 N.C. App. 109 , 208 S.E. 2d 282 (1974). … Britt v. Allen, supra; In re Brown, supra. In sum, there is no merit to the propounders’ contention that a new trial should be granted because of a claimed “insane delusion” of the testatrix.

State v. Dukes

110 N.C. App. 695 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 6, 1993

State v. Smith, 317 N.C. 100, 106-07 , 343 S.E.2d 518, 521-22 (1986) (quoting Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U.S. 291, 301 , 64 L.Ed.2d 297, 308 (1980)); State v. Nations, 319. N.C. 329, 330, 354 S.E.2d 516, 517 (1987). … Brown, 312 N.C. 237 , 321 S.E.2d 856 (1984) (lay witness permitted to testify that tone of voice indicated victim was scared).

McKillop v. Onslow County

139 N.C. App. 53 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 18, 2000

McMiller v. McMiller, 77 N.C. App. 808 , 336 S.E.2d 134 (1985); Cox v. Cox, 10 N.C. App. 476 , 179 S.E.2d 194 (1971)_ Koufman v. Koufman, 97 N.C. … Brown v. United States, 356 U.S. 148, 156 , 2 L. Ed. 2d 589, 597 [,] reh’g denied, 356 U.S. 948 , 2 L.

Pope v. Manville

202 N.C. App. 148 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 19, 2010

Ohar is board-certified in pulmonary, critical care, and internal medicine. Since 2002, she has been a teaching professor at the Wake Forest School of Medicine. … The Industrial Commission is an administrative board, with quasi-judicial functions.

State v. Khuram Ashfaq Choudhry

206 N.C. App. 418 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 17, 2010

See State v. Reeb, 331 N.C. 159, 172 , 415 S.E.2d 362, 369 (1992); State v. Brown, 335 N.C. 477, 484-85 , 439 S.E.2d 589, 594 (1994); State v. Pickens, 346 N.C. 628, 642 , 488 S.E.2d 162, 170 (1997). … See State v. Jordan, 130 N.C.

Lake v. State Health Plan For Teachers & State Emps.

264 N.C. App. 174 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 5, 2019

AND STATE EMPLOYEES, a corporation, formerly Known as the North Carolina Teachers and State Employees’ Comprehensive Major Medical Plan, TEACHERS’ AND STATE EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF NORTH CAROLINA, a corporation, BOARD … Ann. § 87A- 15 (Supp. 2009) (“The board shall administer and carry out the purpose of the fund.

Bartlett Milling Co., LP v. Walnut Grove Auction and Realty Co., Inc.

192 N.C. App. 74 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 19, 2008

Co. v. Young, 117 N.C. … For this violation, the Licensing Board suspended Walnut Grove’s auction license for two years.

Moore v. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service

146 N.C. App. 89 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 4, 2001

Whitfield v. Gilchrist, 348 N.C. 39, 42 , 497 S.E.2d 412, 414 (1998); Truesdale v. University of North Carolina, 91 N.C. … Smith v. State, 289 N.C. 303, 320 , 222 S.E.2d 412, 423-24 (1976). In Whitfield v.

Whitaker v. Akers

137 N.C. App. 274 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 4, 2000

e) (1999) states [a]ny prescription written by a physician assistant or order given by a physician assistant for medications, tests, or treatments shall be deemed to have been authorized by the physician approved by the Board … Id.; see Callahan v. Rogers, 89 N.C. App. 250 , 365 S.E.2d 717 (1988); see Black v.

Moore v. Coachmen Industries, Inc.

129 N.C. App. 389 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 5, 1998

See Acceptance Corp. v. … (quoting Patty Precision Products v. Brown & Sharpe Mfg., 846 F.2d 1247 , 1257 (10th Cir. 1988) (Logan, J. concurring in part and dissenting in part)).

Holland Group, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Administration

130 N.C. App. 721 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 15, 1998

Meachan v. Board of Education, 47 N.C. App. 271, 279 , 267 S.E.2d 349, 354 (1980). … Thompson v. Soles, 299 N.C. 484, 486 , 263 S.E.2d 599, 602 (1980).

McDonald's Corp. v. Dwyer

111 N.C. App. 127 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 20, 1993

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). The facts of the case sub judice make it clear that defendants have a property interest in the land at issue. … See Price v.

State v. Gordon

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 17, 2020

See State v. Spinks, 256 N.C. … GORDON Opinion of the Court after having been incarcerated for roughly fifteen years.3 See, e.g., Brown v.

Catawba County v. Wyant

197 N.C. App. 533 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 16, 2009

State Highway Comm’n v. Batts, 265 N.C. 346, 355 , 144 S.E.2d 126, 133 (1965). … Browning v. Helff, 136 N.C. App. 420, 423 , 524 S.E.2d 95, 98 (2000). Whether a condemnor’s intended use of the land is for the public use or benefit is a question of law for the courts, Piedmont Triad Airport Auth. v.

Bethesda Rd. Partners

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 20, 2019

V. … Brown, 275 N.C. 634, 641, 170 S.E.2d 477, 482 (1969) (holding that to refuse to allow plaintiff to - 11 -  BETHESDA ROAD PARTNERS, LLC. V.

State v. Covington

248 N.C. App. 698 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 2, 2016

Factual Background  STATE V. … The defendant had told officers that he broke into his landlady’s apartment at his boarding house while he was “trip[ping] on . . . acid” so that he could talk to her about his rent.