Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncctapp

9,157 results

0.95s

  • Faison v. New Hanover County Board of Education

    75 N.C. App. 334 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 18, 1985

    Utilities Commission v. Public Staff, 309 N.C. 195, 210 , 306 S.E. 2d 435, 443-444 (1983). The language of the statute is ambiguous, therefore, we must look further to determine the intent of the legislature. … The board shall give him written notice of that decision by June 1 of his third year of employment as a supervisor or principal.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • News & Observer Publishing Co. v. Interim Board of Education

    29 N.C. App. 37 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1976

    See Illinois News Broadcasters Ass’n v. Springfield, 22 Ill. App. 3d 226 , 317 N.E. 2d 288, 290 (1974) ; Laman v. McCord, 245 Ark. 401 , 432 S.W. 2d 753 (1968) ; Times Publishing Company v. … See State v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Sarda v. City/County of Durham Board of Adjustment

    156 N.C. App. 213 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 18, 2003

    Stat. § 160A-388(e), and they have no standing. *215 Heery v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 61 N.C. App. 612, 614 , 300 S.E.2d 869, 870 (1983). … State v. Linemann, 135 N.C. App. 734, 739 , 522 S.E.2d 781, 785 (1999) (citing Burgess v. Gibbs, 262 N.C. 462, 465 , 137 S.E.2d 806, 808 (1964)).

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Leete v. County of Warren

    114 N.C. App. 755 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 17, 1994

    Painter v. Board of Education, 288 N.C. 165, 178 , 217 S.E.2d 650, 658 (1975) (citations omitted). … In keeping with the ruling of Brown v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Herring v. Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Board of Education

    137 N.C. App. 680 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 2, 2000

    Rowan County Board of Education v. … In Vester v. Nash/Rocky Mount Board of Education, 124 N.C.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Board of Transportation v. Charlotte Park & Recreation Commission

    38 N.C. App. 708 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1978

    V, Subch. C, 1965 Session Laws of North Carolina. … Our Supreme Court in Charlotte v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Herring v. Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Board of Education

    188 N.C. App. 441 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 5, 2008

    In Kutzik v. … The evidence presented to the [trial] court is that the Board of Education had insurance to cover the claims in each of those cases.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Armstrong v. North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners

    129 N.C. App. 153 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1998

    An alleged error in statutory interpretation is an error of law, Best v. N.C. State Board of Dental Examiners, 108 N.C. … State v. Ballance, 229 N.C. 764, 769 , 51 S.E.2d 731, 734 (1949); see also Barsky v. Board of Regents, 347 U.S. 442, 449 , 98 L.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Shipman v. North Carolina Private Protective Services Board

    82 N.C. App. 441 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1986

    Roller v. Allen, 245 N.C. 516 , 96 S.E. 2d 851 (1957). … See Lehon v. City of Atlanta, 242 U.S. 53 , 37 S.Ct. 70 , 61 L.Ed. 145 (1916). As noted by the New Jersey Supreme Court in Schulman v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Batdorff v. North Carolina State Board of Elections

    150 N.C. App. 108 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 7, 2002

    However, it is clear from the decision that this matter was properly passed on by the Board who unanimously agreed with the Chairman. … It appears from the Board’s decision that it merely found there was not sufficient evidence of election law violations to warrant further investigation and hearing.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pigford v. BOARD OF ADJ. OF CITY OF KINSTON

    49 N.C. App. 181 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 7, 1980

    Board of Adjustment, 226 N.C. 107 , 37 S.E.2d 128 (1946). This necessarily means that the appealing party must have some interest in the property *183 affected. Lee v. Board of Adjustment, supra. … See also Deffet Rentals, Inc. v. City of Burlington, 27 N.C. App. 361 , 219 S.E.2d 223 (1975); In re Coleman, 11 N.C. App. 124 , 180 S.E. 2d 439 (1971). In Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, 20 N.C.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Phillips v. Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Board of Education

    117 N.C. App. 274 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 6, 1994

    Clark v. Brown, 99 N.C. App. 255, 261 , 393 S.E.2d 134, 137 , disc. review denied, 327 N.C. 426 , 395 S.E.2d 675 (1990); Talent, 57 N.C. App. at 251-2 , 291 S.E.2d at 338 . … Assuming arguendo that plaintiff was discharged by the Board, she has not presented sufficient evidence that this discharge violated the public pol *280 icy of North Carolina. See Amos v.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Dailey v. North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners

    60 N.C. App. 441 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 1, 1983

    Thompson v. Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406 , 233 S.E. 2d 538 (1977). … In Savings & Loan Association v. Savings & Loan Commission, 43 N.C.

    Reversed on other grounds by Dailey v. North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners, 309 N.C. 710 (1983)Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Board of Transportation v. Eastern Developers & Rentals, Inc.

    28 N.C. App. 114 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 17, 1975

    In Templeton v. … State v. Forehand, 17 N.C. App. 287 , 194 S.E. 2d 157 (1973). Finally, defendant contends that" the trial court erred in allowing the Board of Transportation’s witness Terry W.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Duke Power Co. v. Salisbury Zoning Board of Adjustment

    20 N.C. App. 730 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 2, 1974

    The complaining persons were present at the meeting before the Board of Adjustment and had an attorney present at the Superior Court Session at *732 which the hearing was held and the order was entered. … Siler v. Blake, 20 N.C. 90 (1838); In re Coleman, 11 N.C. App. 124 , 180 S.E. 2d 439 (1971). The motion to dismiss the appeal is allowed. Chief Judge Brock and Judge Morris concur.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Capital Outdoor, Inc. v. Guilford County Board of Adjustment

    152 N.C. App. 474 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 20, 2002

    Based on the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in Capital Outdoor, Inc. v. Guilford Cty. Bd. of Adjust., 146 N.C. … According to the dissent in Capital I: The dispositive issue in this case is whether the Board erred in interpreting the Guilford County Development Ordinance (the Ordinance). See Westminster Homes, Inc. v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • 321 News & Video, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    174 N.C. App. 186 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 18, 2005

    In Sherrill v. … See also Godfrey v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Davie County Department of Social Services ex rel. Brown v. Jones

    62 N.C. App. 142 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 3, 1983

    Love v. *143 Moore, 305 N.C. 575 , 291 S.E. 2d 141 (1982); Bailey v. Gooding, 301 N.C. 205 , 270 S.E. 2d 431 (1980). Appeal dismissed. Judges Hedrick and Arnold concur.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Little v. North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners

    64 N.C. App. 67 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1983

    A & T University v. Kimber, 49 N.C. App. 46 , 270 S.E. 2d 492 (1980); Thompson v. Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406 , 233 S.E. 2d 538 (1977). … Comr. of Insurance v. Rating Bureau, 292 N.C. 70, 80 , 231 S.E. 2d 882, 888 (1977).

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Warren v. New Hanover County Board of Education

    104 N.C. App. 522 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 19, 1991

    Piver v. Pender County Board of Education, 835 F.2d 1076, 1078 (4th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1206 , 108 S.Ct. 2847 , 101 L.Ed.2d 885 (1988) (citing Connick v. … Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 569-70 , 88 S.Ct. 1731, 1735 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811, 818 (1968).

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.