Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncctapp

9,157 results

1.48s

  • Klein v. Klein

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 3, 2023

    The physicians sought an injunction to prevent the loss of their board certification and licensure. 137. … Based upon the findings of fact, Husband and other physicians brought the lawsuit to prevent the loss of their board certification and licensure because the loss of board certification would “greatly impact [their] ability

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Blalock v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human Services

    143 N.C. App. 470 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 15, 2001

    Thompson v. Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406, 410 , 233 S.E.2d 538, 541 (1977). … Frizzelle v. Harnett County, 106 N.C. App. 234, 239 , 416 S.E.2d 421, 423 (1992). The opportunity to be heard “must be granted at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.” Armstrong v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Bigelow v. Town of Chapel Hill

    227 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 7, 2013

    Plaintiffs began posting Union notices and articles on the employee bulletin board in early March 2010, and began talking with other employees about the N.C. … See also Moore v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Lincoln v. Bueche

    166 N.C. App. 150 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 7, 2004

    Gaito v. Auman, 313 N.C. 243, 252 , 327 S.E.2d 870, 877 (1985). … Purdy v. Brown, 307 N.C. 93, 96 , 296 S.E.2d 459, 462 (1982). There is no provision in Rule 68 authorizing the trial courts to award attorneys fees.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Tripp v. City of Winston-Salem

    188 N.C. App. 577 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 5, 2008

    disabled police officers: Any member, who did not have five years of creditable service as of August 20, 1990, and who is no longer able to perform the duties of a sworn police officer as certified by the medical review board … Summey v. Barker, 357 N.C. 492, 496 , 586 S.E.2d 247, 249 (2003).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Hodge v. North Carolina Department of Transportation

    137 N.C. App. 247 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 4, 2000

    Dept. of Transportation v. Davenport, 108 N.C. … “An injury is irreparable, within the law of injunctions, where it is of a ‘peculiar nature, so that compensation in money cannot atone for it.’ ” Frink v. Board of Transportation, 27 N.C.

    Reversed by Hodge v. North Carolina Department of Transportation, 352 N.C. 664 (2000)Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Perry

    243 N.C. App. 156 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 15, 2015

    The bags contained brown boxes, rubber bands, and digital scales. Detective Mitchell testified, based on his training and experience, he recognized the brown boxes as the type used to contain plastic bags of heroin. … Katz v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Meeker v. Meeker

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 2, 2024

    In Dudley v. … Diener v. Brown, __ N.C. App. __, __, 892 S.E.2d 212, 215 (2023).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Williams v. CRAFT DEVELOPMENT, LLC

    199 N.C. App. 500 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 1, 2009

    ‘It is the appellant’s duty and responsibility to see that the record is in proper form and complete.’ ” State v. Brown, 142 N.C. App. 491, 492-93 , 543 S.E.2d 192, 193 (2001) (citations omitted); see also Hill v. … Co. v. Young, 117 N.C.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • State v. Norris

    172 N.C. App. 722 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 16, 2005

    State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 566 , 313 S.E.2d 585, 587 (1984). Arson is a common law crime, and has been defined as “the willful and malicious burning of the dwelling house of another person.” State v. Eubanks, 83 N.C. … In State v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. McLean

    232 N.C. App. 111 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 21, 2014

    State v. Foster, ___ N.C. … State v. Brown, 170 N.C. App. 601, 609, 613 S.E.2d 284, 288–89 (2005) (“[N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-269(a)] provides for testing of ‘biological evidence’ and not evidence in general.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Bowden

    229 N.C. App. 95 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 20, 2013

    See Board of Pardons v. Allen, 482 U.S. 369, 371-74 , 96 L.Ed.2d 303, 308-310 (1987); Greenholtz v. Nebraska Penal Inmates, 442 U.S. 1, 12 , 60 L.Ed.2d 668, 678 (1979). 16. The [DOC’s] revocation of Mr. … Ct. at 2106 (stating that the “expectancy of release provided in this statute is entitled to some measure of constitutional protection); Board of Pardons v. Allen, 482 U.S. 369, 371-74 , 107 S.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Gillette v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.

    168 N.C. App. 239 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 18, 2005

    Royster v. Culp, Inc., 343 N.C. 279 , 283, 470 S.E.2d 30 , 32 (1996) (citing Powers v. Lady's Funeral Home, 306 N.C. 728 , 295 S.E.2d 473 (1982)). … Board of Education, 204 N.C. 193 , 167 S.E. 695 (1933). . . . . 4. . . . [P]laintiff's accident does not fall under the special errand exception to the coming and going rule.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Joyce Farms, LLC v. Van Vooren Holdings, Inc.

    232 N.C. App. 591 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 4, 2014

    See Brown v. Miller, 63 N.C. App. 694, 697 , 306 S.E.2d 502, 504 (1983). … Hall v. Shippers Exp., 234 N.C. 38, 40 , 65 S.E.2d 333, 335 (1951).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State Highway Commission v. Matthis

    2 N.C. App. 233 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 18, 1968

    Board of Education v. McMillan, 250 N.C. 485 , 108 S.E. 2d 895 ; Winston-Salem v. Ashby, 194 N.C. 388 , 139 S.E. 764 . … Board of Education v. McMillan, supra; Winston-Salem v. Ashby, supra.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • State v. Hicks

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 31, 2024

    App. at 556–58, 468 S.E.2d at 427–28; Browning, 114 N.C. App. at 232–33, 441 S.E.2d at 609–10; Sheppard, 38 N.C. … App. at 556–58, 468 S.E.2d at 427–28; Browning, 114 N.C. App. at 232–33, 441 S.E.2d at 609–10; Sheppard, 38 N.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Martin

    191 N.C. App. 462 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 5, 2008

    Brown v. City of Winston-Salem, 176 N.C. App. 497, 505 , 626 S.E.2d 747, 753 (2006). … See also State v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • State v. Wooten

    206 N.C. App. 494 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 17, 2010

    See State v. Stephens, 188 N.C. … It must ordinarily be proved by circumstances from which it may be inferred.’ ” State v. Brown, 177 N.C. App. 177, 188 , 628 S.E.2d 787, 794 (2006) (quoting State v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • In Re CB

    636 S.E.2d 336 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 7, 2006

    He also testified that he had fallen on a board previously that day and fell on his buttocks. He did not look at his buttocks afterward to see if they were bruised. … See, e.g., Scott v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Doe v. Diocese Raleigh

    242 N.C. App. 42 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 7, 2015

    In Harris v. … Gibson v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.