Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncctapp

9,157 results

1.42s

  • Vares v. Vares

    154 N.C. App. 83 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 19, 2002

    See id; see also Watson v. … Brown v. Lifford, 136 N.C. App. 379, 382 , 524 S.E.2d 587, 589 (2000).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • State v. Abshire

    192 N.C. App. 594 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 16, 2008

    We disregard defendant’s evidence except to the extent it favors or clarifies the State’s case.’ ” State v. Hinkle, 189 N.C. App. 762, 766 , 659 S.E.2d 34, 36 (2008) (citation omitted). … Hall v. Board of Elections, 280 N.C. 600 , 187 S.E.2d 52 (1972). When distinguishing domicile and residence, the Court held: Residence simply indicates a person’s actual place of abode, whether permanent or temporary.

    Reversed on other grounds by State v. Abshire, 363 N.C. 322 (2009)Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Kohls

    187 N.C. App. 306 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 20, 2007

    State v. Jacobs, 128 N.C. App. 559, 563 , 495 S.E.2d 757, 760 (1998) (citing State v. Baker, 333 N.C. 325 , 426 S.E.2d 73 (1993)). … Id. at 687—88, 518 S.E.2d at 505 (quoting State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179, 204 , 358 S.E.2d 1, 18 (1987)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mehaffey v. Burger King

    217 N.C. App. 318 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 6, 2011

    Goff v. Foster Forbes Glass Div., 140 N.C. App. 130, 132-33 , 535 S.E.2d 602, 604 (2000). The Commission’s conclusions of law “are reviewable de novo by this Court.” Grantham v. R.G. Barry Corp., 127 N.C. … Anderson v. Lincoln Constr. Co., 265 N.C. 431, 433-34 , 144 S.E.2d 272, 274 (1965).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Houston v. Town of Chapel Hill

    177 N.C. App. 739 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 6, 2006

    Diaz v. Div. of Soc. Servs., 360 N.C. 384, 387 , 628 S.E.2d 1, 3 (2006) (citing Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc., 326 N.C. 205, 209 , 388 S.E.2d 134, 136 (1990)). … Co. v. City of Fayetteville Bd. of Adjustment, 155 N.C. App. 548, 550 , 573 S.E.2d 737, 739 (2002) (stating appellate role of the superior court in reviewing decisions made by a city Board of Adjustment).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re SDR

    191 N.C. App. 552 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 5, 2008

    In re Brown, 150 N.C.App. 127, 129 , 562 S.E.2d 583, 585 (2002) (citation omitted). … State v. Boone, 297 N.C. 652, 659 , 256 S.E.2d 683, 687 (1979).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Wester

    71 N.C. App. 321 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 20, 1984

    State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 566 , 313 S.E. 2d 585, 587 (1984). … State v. Hall, 305 N.C. 77 , 286 S.E. 2d 552 (1982).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hill v. Bechtel

    106 N.C. App. 675 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 7, 1992

    On 7 May 1990, plaintiff filed a suit against the Director of the Guilford County DSS and the Chairman of the Board of the DSS of Guilford County. … See also, Robertson v. Jackson, 766 F. Supp. 470, 477 (E.D. Va. 1991).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Thornton v. F.J. Cherry Hospital

    183 N.C. App. 177 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 15, 2007

    Lineback v. Wake County Board of Commissioners, 126 N.C. App. 678, 680 , 486 S.E.2d 252, 254 (1997). The Commission is “the sole judge of the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be given their testimony.” … Crawford v. Wayne County Board of Education, 3 N.C. App. 343, 346 , 164 S.E.2d 748, 750 (1968), aff'd, 275 N.C. 354 , 168 S.E.2d 33 (1969).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. Buckom

    126 N.C. App. 368 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1997

    See State v. McGough, 536 So. 2d 1187 , 1189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. (1989)); Thurmond v. Board of Com’rs of Hall County, 330 S.E.2d 787 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985). … See State v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • State v. Rogers

    227 N.C. App. 617 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 4, 2013

    State v. Braxton, 352 N.C. 158, 174-75 , 531 S.E.2d 428, 437-38 (2000); State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179, 191 , 358 S.E.2d 1, 11 (1987). … In State v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Pimental

    153 N.C. App. 69 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 17, 2002

    App. at 625 , 463 S.E.2d at 404 ; accord State v. Brown, 142 N.C. App. 491, 492 , 543 S.E.2d 192, 193 (2001). … Similarly, in State v.

    Cited 80 timesPublished
  • Daly v. Kelly

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 21, 2020

    In State v. … Silver v. Halifax County Board of Commissioners, 371 N.C. 855, 863, 821 S.E.2d 755, 761 (2018) (citation and quotation marks omitted).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Goldston v. State

    173 N.C. App. 416 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 20, 2005

    App. 741, 747 , 478 S.E.2d 643, 647 (1996) (quoting Branch v. Board of Education, 233 N.C. 623, 625 , 65 S.E.2d 124, 126 (1951)), disc. review denied, 345 N.C. 753 , 485 S.E.2d 52 -53 (1997). … See Lewis v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Wright v. American General Life Insurance

    59 N.C. App. 591 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 7, 1982

    See, e.g., Ballance v. Wentz, 286 N.C. 294, 301-02 , 210 S.E. 2d 390, 394-95 (1974); Board of Education v. Lamm, 276 N.C. 487, 491 , 173 S.E. 2d 281, 284 (1970). … See Foods, Inc. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. Messer

    145 N.C. App. 43 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 17, 2001

    A copy of the calendar, including the add-on calendar, is posted on a bulletin board in the clerk’s office. Additionally, a copy of the calendar is posted outside of the courtroom “before Monday of that Court date.” … (district attorney may add a case to the calendar if the case is docketed after the calendar has been filed); State v. Edwards, 70 N.C.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Beneficial Mortgage Co. of North Carolina v. Peterson

    163 N.C. App. 73 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 2, 2004

    See Coker v. … Brown v. Miller, 63 N.C. App. 694, 697 , 306 S.E.2d 502, 504 (1983), appeal dismissed and disc. review denied, 310 N.C. 476 , 312 S.E.2d 882 (1984). Defendants have *83 presented no reason why N.C. Gen.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Klein v. Klein

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 3, 2023

    The physicians sought an injunction to prevent the loss of their board certification and licensure. 137. … Based upon the findings of fact, Husband and other physicians brought the lawsuit to prevent the loss of their board certification and licensure because the loss of board certification would “greatly impact [their] ability

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Splawn

    23 N.C. App. 14 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 18, 1974

    State v. Blackwell, 276 N.C. 714 , 174 S.E. 2d 534 (1970) ; State v. Virgil, 263 N.C. 73 , 138 S.E. 2d 777 (1964) ; State v. McMilliam, 243 N.C. 771 , 92 S.E. 2d 202 (1956). … State v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Proposed Assessment of Additional Franchise Tax for the Taxable Quarters Ended March 31, 1980 v. Carolina Telephone & Telegraph Co.

    81 N.C. App. 240 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1986

    State v. Lee, 277 N.C. 242, 244 , 176 S.E. 2d 772, 774 (1970) (quoting State v. Fenner, 263 N.C. 694 , 140 S.E. 2d 349 (1965). … For the reasons stated, we affirm the trial court’s order affirming the Tax Review Board. Affirmed. Judges Arnold and Parker concur.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.