Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,157 results
2.34s
In re Complaints Against Officials of Kill Devil Hills Police Department
223 N.C. App. 113 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 16, 2012
Ales v. T.A. Loving Co., 163 N.C. App. 350, 352 , 593 S.E.2d 453, 455 (2004) (citing Harper v. City of Asheville, 160 N.C. App. 209 , 585 S.E.2d 240, 243 (2003)). B. … For Nurses v. Joint Comm. On Standardization, 234 N.C. 673, 680 , 68 S.E.2d 862, 867-868 (1952) (citations omitted).
Cited 5 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · May 6, 2014
State v. Mercer, 317 N.C. 87, 96, 343 S.E.2d 885, 890- 91 (1986) (citing State v. Roseman, 279 N.C. 573, 184 S.E. 2d 289 (1971), and State v. … In State v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNorth Carolina State Bar v. Leonard
178 N.C. App. 432 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 18, 2006
State Bar v. … See Okwara v.
Cited 8 timesPublished46 N.C. App. 672 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 20, 1980
In Belk v. … Koury v. Follo, 272 N.C. 366, 372 , 158 S.E. 2d 548 (1968).
Cited 11 timesPublished204 N.C. App. 176 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 18, 2010
In Watkins v. Raleigh, 214 N.C. 644 , 200 S.E. 424 (1939), our Supreme Court held that a hole in the sidewalk which was 2 1/2 feet wide and 2 or more inches in depth was trivial. Id. In Falatovitch v. … control over all public streets, sidewalks, alleys, bridges, and other ways of public passage within its corporate limits except to the extent that authority and control over certain streets and bridges is vested in the Board
Cited 3 timesPublished250 N.C. App. 173 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 18, 2016
State v. Johnson, 98 N.C. App. 290, 294, 390 S.E.2d 707, 709 (1990) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). “We review the trial court's conclusions of law de novo.” State v. Brown, 217 N.C. … State v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrooks v. Southern National Corp.
131 N.C. App. 80 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1998
York v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, 624 F.2d 495, 500 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1043 , 66 L. Ed. 2d 504 (1980); see also Society for Savings v. Bowers, 349 U.S. 143 , 99 L. Ed. 950 (1955). … In Stocks v. Thompson, 1 N.C.
Cited 4 timesPublishedVariety Wholesalers, Inc. v. Salem Logistics Traffic Services, LLC
212 N.C. App. 400 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 7, 2011
Variety also argues that Ark owed it a fiduciary duty by being in possession of Variety’s allegedly converted funds and by having a position on Salem’s Board of Directors. … Crow v. McCullen, 235 N.C. 380, 383 , 70 S.E.2d 198, 200 (1952). We must interpret the Freight Agreement by examining the language of the Agreement for the parties’ intent. Lane v.
Reversed on other grounds by Variety Wholesalers, Inc. v. Salem Logistics Traffic Services, LLC, 365 N.C. 520 (2012)Cited 3 timesPublishedPayne v. Parks Chevrolet, Inc.
119 N.C. App. 383 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1995
Meacham v. Board of Education, 59 N.C. App. 381 , 297 S.E.2d 192 (1982), disc. review denied, 307 N.C. 577 , 299 S.E.2d 651 (1983). … Davis v. Dennis Lilly Co., 330 N.C. 314 , 411 S.E.2d 133 (1991).
Cited 3 timesPublished248 N.C. App. 663 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 2, 2016
State v. Brown, 182 N.C. App. 115, 118, 646 S.E.2d 775, 777 (2007) (citing State v. Ferguson, 140 N.C. App. 699, 706, 538 S.E.2d 217, 222 (2000)). … Blue Jeans Corp. v. Clothing Workers, 275 N.C. 503, 508, 511, 169 S.E.2d 867, 870, 872 (1969). Moreover, in State v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedEstate of Bullock v. C.C. Mangum Co.
188 N.C. App. 518 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 5, 2008
Brown v. R.R., 204 N.C. 668, 671 , 169 S.E. 419, 420 (1933). … Groce v. Rapidair, Inc., 305 F. Supp. 1238, 1241 (1969). N.C. Gen.
Cited 10 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 18, 2022
STATE V. … Brown v. City of Winston-Salem, 176 N.C. App. 497, 505, 626 S.E.2d 747, 753 (2006) (citation omitted).
Cited 0 timesPublished172 N.C. App. 782 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 16, 2005
Brown, 310 N.C. 563 , 566, 313 S.E.2d 585 , 587 (1984) (citing State v. Smith, 300 N.C. 71 , 78, 265 S.E.2d 164 , 169 (1980)). … See State v. Revels, 227 N.C. 34 , 36, 40 S.E.2d 474 , 475 (1946); State v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 18, 2014
Brown, for the State. Irving Joyner for Defendant. DILLON, Judge. … State v. Holliman, 155 N.C. App. 120, 123, 573 S.E.2d 682, 685 (2002) (citations and quotation marks omitted).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedHouse of Raeford Farms, Inc. v. City of Raeford
112 N.C. App. 522 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 2, 1993
Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. Board of Commissioners of the Town of Nags Head, 299 N.C. 620, 626-27 , 265 S.E.2d 379, 383 , reh’g denied, 300 N.C. 562 , 270 S.E.2d 106 (1980). … See Nucor Corp. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished102 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 5, 1991
Co. v. … Sheets v.
Reversed on other grounds by Bryson v. Sullivan, 330 N.C. 644 (1992)Cited 10 timesPublished262 N.C. App. 402 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 20, 2018
In Anders v. … Davis v. Craven County ABC Board, __ N.C. App. __, __, 814 S.E.2d 602, 605 (2018).
Abrogated on other grounds by In re L.E.M., 372 N.C. 396 (2019)Cited 5 timesPublished58 N.C. App. 515 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 3, 1982
Brown Assistant District Attorney On the basis of case law and statutory authority, I, too, am compelled to conclude that this indictment is sufficient to charge the crime of first degree sex offense. See State v. … S. v. Pratt, 116 A. 2d 924 ; S. v. Hill, 176 So. 719 (Miss.); People v. Angier, 112 P. 2d 659 (Cal.); Hopper v. S., 302 P. 2d 162 (Okla.); S. v. Withrow, 96 S.E. 2d 913 (W. Va.); Wharton v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedUssery v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.
227 N.C. App. 434 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 21, 2013
In Duke v. St. … Brown, 228 N.C. 636 , 46 S.E.2d 715 (1948) (note to be paid out of profits of a partnership in which maker and payee were engaged); Ripple v.
Cited 8 timesPublished106 N.C. App. 342 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 2, 1992
This case differs from Medlin in that there is no evidence that the parties held meetings of their “board” after each robbery. … State v. Davis, 101 N.C.
Cited 15 timesPublished
Ask Donna