Case law

Kaimowitz v. Duke Law Journal

68 N.C. App. 463 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 15, 1984

Whether an article or review is of publishable quality depends on the ultimate determination of an editorial board after an initial evaluation by a screening editor. … Pitts v. Pizza, Inc., 296 N.C. 81 , 249 S.E. 2d 375 (1978). We find the statements of our Supreme Court in Baumann v.

State v. King

235 N.C. App. 187 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 15, 2014

P. 9(a) (“In appeals from the trial division of the General Court of Justice, review is solely upon the record on appeal . . . .”); Neal v. Craig Brown, Inc., 86 N.C. … In State v. Hall, our Supreme Court, analyzing its prior opinion in State v.

State v. Blount

209 N.C. App. 340 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 18, 2011

See State v. McGee, 175 N.C. … See State v. Smith, 139 N.C.

Brooksby v. North Carolina Administrative Office of Courts

248 N.C. App. 471 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 2, 2016

Defendants also submitted an affidavit from Diana Brown, Assistant Clerk of Superior Court in Randolph County and supervisor of the foreclosure records in question, which stated the parties agreed to Plaintiffs’ use of … Ass’n of -6-  BROOKSBY V. N.C. AOC Opinion of the Court N.C., Inc. v. N.C.

State v. Parker

185 N.C. App. 437 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 21, 2007

Russell Cooke, a board-certified pediatrician who treated Nayshawn at Beaufort County Hospital, testified that, based on the infant’s “vitals, [and] given the blood loss, the onset of the traumatic event” would have been … Ira Adler, a board-certified radiologist qualified in pediatric radiology, testified that he examined Nayshawn’s medical scans and was of the opinion that the trauma which led to the swelling of Nayshawn’s brain occurred

McIntyre v. McIntyre

175 N.C. App. 558 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 17, 2006

Plaintiff initiated the instant action by filing a 24 August 1999 complaint seeking divorce from bed and board and division of the parties' separate and marital property. … Id.; see also Stafford v.

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 5, 2024

State v. Simpkins, 373 N.C. 530, 533, 838 S.E.2d 439, 444 (2020). … Brown, 239 N.C.

Moseley v. L & L Construction, Inc.

123 N.C. App. 79 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 2, 1996

Harris v. NCNB, 85 N.C. App. 669, 670 , 355 S.E.2d 838, 840 (1987). … We disagree. *85 Our Supreme Court’s decisions in Sorrells v. M. Y. B. Hospitality Ventures of Asheville, 334 N.C. 669 , 435 S.E.2d 320 (1993), and Gardner v.

State Highway Commission v. Rose

31 N.C. App. 28 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1976

In Haymore v. Highway Commission, 14 N.C. … Highway Commission v. Yarborough, 6 N.C.

State v. Burton

224 N.C. App. 120 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 4, 2012

State v. … While “it cannot be presumed that a limiting instruction is automatically sufficient to negate highly inflammatory evidence[,]” State v. Brown, _ N.C.

Aetna Better Health of N.C.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 21, 2021

Mandeville, and Mayer Brown, LLP, by Rodger V. Abbot, Luke Levasseur, and Marcia G. Madesen, for Respondent-Intervenor-Appellee AmeriHealth Caritas of North Carolina, Inc. … V. N.C. DEP’T OF HEALTH & HUM.

Williams v. N.C. Department of Economic & Community Development

119 N.C. App. 535 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 18, 1995

P. 9(a)(l)(k), 10(d); see Cieszko v. Clark, 92 N.C. App. 290, 294 , 374 S.E.2d 456, 459 (1988). … See N.C.G.S. § 150B-51(b) (1991); Brooks v. Ansco & Assocs., 114 N.C.

McIntyre v. McIntyre

188 N.C. App. 26 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 15, 2008

See also Anderson v. Anderson, 145 N.C. … See, e.g., Stewart v. Stewart, 141 N.C.

Friel v. Angell Care Inc.

113 N.C. App. 505 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 1, 1994

West v. King’s Dep’t Store, Inc., 321 N.C. 698, 703 , 365 S.E.2d 621, 624 (1988). See also Andrews v. Elliot, 109 N.C. App. 271 , 426 S.E.2d 430 (1993); Morrow v. Kings Dep’t Stores, Inc., 57 N.C. … Campbell v. Board of Education of Catawba County, 76 N.C. App. 495, 498 , 333 S.E.2d 507, 510 (1985), disc. rev. denied, 315 N.C. 390 , 338 S.E.2d 878 (1986).

State ex rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Fire Insurance Rating Bureau

30 N.C. App. 549 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 1, 1976

The holding of public hearings on rate filings is controlled primarily by G.S. 58-27.2 (a) and the rules and regulations made by the Insurance Advisory Board pursuant to the authority granted by G.S. 58-27.1 (c). … . *555 In Comr. of Insurance v. Rating Bureau, 29 N.C. App. 237 , 224 S.E. 2d 223 (1976), the Bureau filed on 6 January 1975, for a reduction in extended coverage and windstorm insurance rates.

Chandak v. Electronic Interconnect Corp.

144 N.C. App. 258 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 19, 2001

Baylor v. Brown, 46 N.C. App. 664 , 266 S.E.2d 9 (1980). In addition to these requirements, the movant must also show that he has a meritorious defense. Sides v. Reid, 35 N.C. App. 235 , 241 S.E.2d 110 (1978). … Clark v. Clark, 301 N.C. 123, 129 , 271 S.E.2d 58, 63 (1980). State ex rel. Envir. Mgmt. Comm. v. House of Raeford Farms, 101 N.C.

Powell v. Peachtree Fasteners, Inc.

110 N.C. App. 336 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 1, 1993

Omli has testified and I am entitled to put the number on the board that he did testify to. Will you allow me to do that? *352 The COURT: Yes. (Mr. Walker writing on the board.) MR. … In State v.

Simmons v. North Carolina Department of Transportation

128 N.C. App. 402 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 20, 1998

See Evans v. … Trust Co. v. Board of Education, 251 N.C. 603, 609 , 111 S.E.2d 844, 849 (1960).

Keels v. Turner

45 N.C. App. 213 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 19, 1980

See State v. Thornton, 251 N.C. 658 , 111 S.E. 2d 901 (1960) (“The Chuck Wagon” not a corporate entity); Goard v. Branscom, 15 N.C. … Stanback v. Stanback, 297 N.C. 181, 186 , 254 S.E. 2d 611, 616 (1979).

State v. Bonds

120 N.C. App. 546 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 7, 1995

State v. Harris, 279 N.C. 307, 310 , 182 S.E.2d 364, 367 (1971). … In fact, neither the defendant nor the school board contends before this court that they are entitled to the proceeds. For the foregoing reasons, we reverse the trial court’s order.