Case law

State v. Goodson

178 N.C. App. 557 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 18, 2006

See State v. … State v. Aspell, 225 N.E.2d 226, 228 (Ohio 1967).

State v. Lukoskie

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 18, 2014

In State v. … See State v.

Hendrix v. Alsop

1 N.C. App. 422 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 19, 1968

Kohler v. Construction Co., 271 N.C. 187 , 155 S.E. 2d 558 . … Brown v. Lumber Co., 167 N.C. 9 , 82 S.E. 961 .

State ex rel Utilities Commission v. Chapel Hill Telephone Co.

12 N.C. App. 543 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 20, 1971

The statute G.S. 116-41.2(3) provided that the Board of Trustees of the University of North Carolina in the operation of the University Enterprises shall have the power “(t)o establish, maintain, revise, charge and collect … Springer v. Shavender, 118 N.C. 33 , 23 S.E. 976 (1896).

Vinson Realty Co., Inc. v. Honig

88 N.C. App. 113 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1987

Hall v. Wake Co. Board of Elections, 280 N.C. 600 , 187 S.E. 2d 52 (1972), modified on other grounds by Lloyd v. Babb, 296 N.C. 416 , 251 S.E. 2d 843 (1979); Sheffield v. Walker, 231 N.C. 556 , 58 S.E. 2d 356 (1950). … Brann v. Hanes, 194 N.C. 571 , 140 S.E. 292 (1927).

State v. Williamson

72 N.C. App. 657 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1985

In State v. Corn, 303 N.C. 293 , 278 S.E. 2d 221 (1981), the Court said: Premeditation has been defined by this Court as thought beforehand for some length of time, however short. … Williamson obtained a divorce from bed and board and began to date another man. Defendant argued with Mrs. Williamson about visitation with his daughter. Mrs.

Estate of Redden Ex Rel. Morley v. Redden

179 N.C. App. 113 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 1, 2006

Wachovia Realty Investments v. Housing, Inc., 292 N.C. 93 , 232 S.E.2d 667 (1977); Beck v. Am. Bankers Life Assurance Co., 36 N.C. App. 218 , 243 S.E.2d 414 (1978); Atkins v. Mitchell, 91 N.C. … An account established pursuant to North Carolina General Statutes, Section 53-146.2 “is a tentative trust, better known as a ‘Totten Trust.’ ” Jimenez v. Brown, 131 N.C.

In re: S.V.C., S.D.C., P.R.C., III, K.L.C.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 6, 2015

Brown- Ramseur providing transportation for her. . . . Ms. … App. 399, 405, 555 S.E.2d 643, 647 (2001); see also Dealers Specialties, Inc. v. Neighborhood Hous. Servs., 305 N.C. 633, 635, 291 S.E.2d 137, 139 (1982).

Stout v. City of Durham

121 N.C. App. 716 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 5, 1996

Huggins v. Board of Education, 272 N.C. 33 , 157 S.E.2d 703 (1967). … Industries v. McClure, 308 N.C. 393 , 302 S.E.2d 754 (1983); N.C. Electric Membership Corp. v. N.C. Dept. of Econ. & Comm. Dev., 108 N.C. App. 711 , 425 S.E.2d 440 (1993).

Carolina First Bank v. Stark, Inc.

190 N.C. App. 561 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 20, 2008

See McGee v. F.W. Poe Mfg. … Crafton v. Brown, 346 S.C. 347, 351 , 550 S.E.2d 904, 906 (S.C. Ct. App. 2001) (quotation omitted). The credit memoranda regarding the 2001 loan were created after the execution of the guaranties.

Faulkenbury v. Teachers' & State Employees' Retirement System

110 N.C. App. 97 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 4, 1993

This case is a companion case to Woodard v. North Carolina Local Governmental Employees’ Retirement System et al., No. 9210SC202, filed simultaneously herewith. … For the reasons stated in Woodard v.

Chem-Security Systems, Inc. v. Morrow

61 N.C. App. 147 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 1, 1983

Gaskill v. Costlow, 270 N.C. 686 , 155 S.E. 2d 148 (1967); Lamb v. Board of Education, 235 N.C. 377 , 70 S.E. 2d 201 (1952). … Chadwick v.

Smith v. Beasley Enterprises, Inc./Red Apple

148 N.C. App. 559 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 5, 2002

Sidney v. Raleigh Paving & Patching, 109 N.C. App. 254 , 426 S.E.2d 424 (1993). … Jenkins v. Easco Aluminum Corp., 142 N.C. App. 71 , 541 S.E.2d 510 (2001); Lineback v. Wake County Board of Commissioners, 126 N.C. App. 678 , 486 S.E.2d 252 (1997); and Weaver v. American National Can Corp., 123 N.C.

State v. Austin

31 N.C. App. 20 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1976

See Board of Pharmacy v. Lane, 248 N.C. 134 , 102 S.E. 2d 832 (1958). … In State v.

Hudson v. Hudson

135 N.C. App. 97 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 21, 1999

Brown on 13 April 1998, plaintiff’s counsel was absent. … Brooks v. Rogers, 82 N.C. App. 502, 507 , 346 S.E.2d 677, 681 (1986).

State v. Washington

193 N.C. App. 670 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 18, 2008

Watkins, 337 N.C. 437, 441 , 446 S.E.2d 67, 70 (1994) (quoting Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 51 , 61 L. Ed. 2d 357, 362 (1979)), appeal after remand on other grounds, 120 N.C. App. 804 , 463 S.E.2d 802 (1995). … .”); State v. Edwards, 164 N.C.

McFadyen v. Freeman

127 N.C. App. 202 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1997

schools and institutions listed in subsection (p) of G.S. 115C-325 [which includes DOC] shall be compensated at the same rate as are teachers in the public schools in accordance with the salary schedule adopted by the State Board … Smith v. N. C. Farm Bureau Mutual Ins. Co., 84 N.C. App. 120, 123 , 351 S.E.2d 774, 776 (citing Henry v. Dean, 310 N.C. 75 , 310 S.E.2d 326 (1984)), aff’d, 321 N.C. 60 , 361 S.E.2d 571 (1987).

Coleman v. Rudisill

131 N.C. App. 530 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 1, 1998

Hairston v. Alexander Tank and Equipment Co., 310 N.C. 227, 236 , 311 S.E.2d 559, 566 (1984) (quoting Harton v. Telephone Co., 141 N.C. 455, 462-63 , 54 S.E. 299, 301-02 (1906)); Jackson v. … In this case, the undisputed facts show that the forty-two year old Cook in the company of the five children ignored signs prohibiting trespassing, helped place the boat in the water, and boarded a four-person paddle boat

Barnard v. Johnston Health Servs. Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 18, 2020

Brown in Johnston County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 15 October 2019. The Armstrong Law Firm, P.A., by L. Lamar Armstrong, III and L. … Ragsdale v. Kennedy, 286 N.C. 130, 137, 209 S.E.2d 494, 499 (1974).

Zurosky v. Shaffer

236 N.C. App. 219 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 2, 2014

Brown v. Brown, 264 N.C. 485, 488, 141 11 This Court has held that a trial court is obligated to make specific findings regarding the value of property in an equitable distribution order. Poore v. Poore, 75 N.C. … See Loosvelt v. Brown, ___ N.C. App. ___, ___, ___ S.E.2d ___, ___, COA13-747, 2014 WL 3409156 at *7– 8 (2014); see also Guidelines, 2014 Ann. R.