Case law

Van Engen v. Que Scientific, Inc.

151 N.C. App. 683 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 6, 2002

See First American Savings & Loan Assoc. v. Satterfield, 87 N.C. App. 160 , 359 S.E.2d 812 (1987). See also Howze v. Hughes, 134 N.C. App. 493 , 518 S.E.2d 198 (1999). … Charns v. Brown, 129 N.C. App. 635, 638 , 502 S.E.2d 7, 9 (1998).

State v. Ogles

817 S.E.2d 923 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 18, 2018

See State v. … "); State v.

State v. Hall

355 S.E.2d 250 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 5, 1987

State v. Brown, 280 N.C. 588 , 187 S.E.2d 85 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 870 , 93 S.Ct. 198 , 34 L.Ed.2d 121 (1972). … See State v. Whitaker, 316 N.C. 515 , 342 S.E.2d 514 (1986). In State v.

Carawan v. Carolina Telephone & Telegraph Co.

79 N.C. App. 703 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 18, 1986

Byers v. North Carolina State Hwy. Comm., 3 N.C. App. 139 , 164 S.E. 2d 535 (1968), aff'd, 275 N.C. 229 , 166 S.E. 2d 649 (1969). … In Caulder v.

McInerney v. Pinehurst Area Realty, Inc.

162 N.C. App. 285 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 20, 2004

Browning v. Helff 136 N.C. App. 420, 423 , 524 S.E.2d 95, 98 (2000). Substantial evidence is “ ‘such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.’ ” McConnell v. … East Lenoir Sanitary Dist. v.

Diaz v. Smith

219 N.C. App. 570 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 3, 2012

We, therefore, hold that petitioner has standing to have this court review the Board’s determination as to the insurance coverage.”); Associated Theaters v. Industrial Acc. Commission, 57 Cal. … Co. v. Goodman, 117 N.C.

CB Windswept

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 20, 2015

Nifong v. C.C. Mangum, Inc., 121 N.C. App. 767, 768, 468 S.E.2d 463, 465 (1996) (citing Shore v. Brown, 324 N.C. 427, 428, 378 S.E.2d 778, 779 (1989)). … Opinion of the Court imposed whenever a water and sewer board expressed even the vaguest intention to possibly extend service at some unspecified time in the future.

State v. Rick

126 N.C. App. 612 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1997

State v. … Id.; see also State v. Brown, 300 N.C. 731 , 268 S.E.2d 201 (1980). Therefore, this argument fails.

Singleton v. N.C. Dep't of Health & Hum. Servs.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 21, 2022

Singleton”) is a board-certified ophthalmologist, licensed as a medical doctor by the North Carolina Medical Board, and practices in New Bern. Dr. Singleton founded Singleton Vision Center, P.A. … See North Carolina State Bd. of Dental Exam’rs v. FTC 574 U. S. 494, 514, 191 L. Ed. 2d 35, 54 (2015) (State dental board cannot confine teeth whitening to licensed dental offices.).

Kennedy v. Gardner

170 N.C. App. 118 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 3, 2005

Neal v. Craig Brown, Inc., 86 N.C.App. 157 , 162, 356 S.E.2d 912 , 915 (1987)(quoting Hetrick, Webster's Real Estate Law in North Carolina, § 241 at 251 (Rev. ed.1981)). … Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., N.A. v.

Forsyth County v. Shelton

74 N.C. App. 674 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 21, 1985

See Jackson v. Board of Adjustment, 275 N.C. 155 , 166 S.E. 2d 78 (1969). … Rollins v. Miller Roofing Co., 55 N.C. App. 158 , 284 S.E. 2d 697 (1981).

Washburn v. Yadkin Valley Bank & Trust Co.

190 N.C. App. 315 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 6, 2008

See Helms v. Holland, 124 N.C. … See United Labs., Inc. v.

North Carolina Bankers Ass'n v. North Carolina Credit Union Commission

45 N.C. App. 19 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1980

bylaw in the absence of common bond amounts to and is an unlawful discrimination against each of the petitioners in violation of the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 19 and Article V, … They support their construction of the statutory language with observations such as, “[A] liquor clerk employed by an ABC board in Avery County has nothing in common with a Greek professor employed by a State-supported university

Gagnon v. Gagnon

149 N.C. App. 194 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 5, 2002

Lewis v. Lewis, 83 N.C. App. 438, 442-43 , 350 S.E.2d 587, 589 (1986); see also Seifert v. Seifert, 82 N.C. … See Atkinson v. Chandler, 130 N.C.

State v. Byers

175 N.C. App. 280 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 3, 2006

In addition, Officer Donna Browning related her response to a call from Burke on 19 September 2000. Burke complained to Officer Browning that defendant threw bricks at her window and that she feared him. Dr. … See State v.

Edwards v. Edwards

118 N.C. App. 464 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 18, 1995

Board of Education, 288 N.C. 165, 173 , 217 S.E.2d 650, 655 (1975) (quoting Gibbs v. Higgins, 215 N.C. 201, 204-05 , 1 S.E.2d 554, 557 (1939)). … Heath v. Board of Commissioners, 292 N.C. 369, 375-76 , 233 S.E.2d 889, 893 (1977) (citing N.C.R. Civ. P. Rule 14 (a)).

Harrington v. Harrington

22 N.C. App. 419 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 17, 1974

Rouse v. Rouse, 258 N.C. 520 , 128 S.E. 2d 865 ; Lockhart v. Lockhart, 223 N.C. 559 , 27 S.E. 2d 444 ; Johnson v. Johnson, 12 N.C. App. 505 , 183 S.E. 2d 805 , cert. denied, 279 N.C. 727 , 184 S.E. 2d 884 . In Rouse v. … The North Carolina Supreme Court so held in the case of Taylor v. Taylor, 225 N.C. 80 , 33 S.E. 2d 492 , and Pharr v. Pharr, 223 N.C. 115 , 25 S.E. 2d 471 . But in Pickens v.

Bruggeman v. Meditrust Acquisition Co.

138 N.C. App. 612 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 5, 2000

See Cherry Bekaert & Holland v. Brown, 99 N.C. App. 626 , 394 S.E.2d 651 (1990). The allegations of the complaint must disclose jurisdiction although the particulars of jurisdiction need not be alleged. See Williams v. … In Dillon v.

Heatherly v. State

189 N.C. App. 213 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 18, 2008

(citing Brockenbrough v. Board of Water Comm'rs, 134 N.C. 1 , 46 S.E. 28 (1903) and Williamson v. High Point, 213 N.C. 96 , 195 S.E. 90 *16 (1938)). … Hart v. Board of Comm'rs, 192 N.C. 161, 164 , 134 S.E. 403, 404 (1926) (citations omitted) (emphasis added); see also Carolina Util.

State v. Sheffield

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 5, 2022

Rael, 321 N.C. 528, 534, 364 S.E.2d 125, 129 (1988); State v. Brown, 178 N.C. App. 189, 193, 631 S.E.2d 49, 52 (2006). We address this issue under Rule 401 and Rule 404(b). … Brown, 178 N.C. App. at 193, 631 S.E.2d at 52. ¶ 22 Here, the evidence falls under both aspects of our caselaw.