Case law

Fontana v. Southeast Anesthesiology Consultants

221 N.C. App. 582 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 17, 2012

V, Section I of SAC’s Bylaws.” … See generally Ragan v. Wheat First Sec., Inc., 138 N.C.

State v. Knight

245 N.C. App. 532 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 16, 2016

United States v. Brown, 664 F.3d 1115 , 1118 (7th Cir.2011). … State v. Brown, 306 N.C. 151 , 164, 293 S.E.2d 569 , 578 (1982).

Ramirez v. Little

168 N.C. App. 729 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 1, 2005

Defendant took Brian into an examination room and noticed greenish brown fluid coming from the baby's mouth and nose. Brian was barely breathing and had no heart tones. … Page v. Hospital, 49 N.C. App. 533 , 535, 272 S.E.2d 8 , 10 (1980). Our appellate courts have considered how medical experts must testify regarding their knowledge of the standard of care. See Tucker v. Meis, 127 N.C.

State v. Downey

200 N.C. App. 436 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 20, 2009

State v. Brown, 178 N.C. App. 189, 195 , 631 S.E.2d 49, 53 (2006) (quoting State v. Burton, 114 N.C. App. 610, 612-13 , 442 S.E.2d 384, 386 (1994)) (citation omitted). … Brown, 178 N.C. App. at 195 , 631 S.E.2d at 53 . III. Next, defendant argues that the trial court erred by not allowing the defendant's expert, Dr. John Warren ("Dr.

State v. Killette

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 4, 2014

The evidence destroyed included duct tape from the crime scene, a pair of defendant’s shoes, a brown paper bag containing miscellaneous items of clothing, a brown paper bag containing two multi-colored hoodies … , and a brown paper bag containing pieces of duct tape with shoe impressions.

Read v. Read

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 18, 2023

After passing her boards in 1996, Plaintiff- Appellee bought North Hill Chiropractic and began running a single-person chiropractic business. … V.

Higgins v. BUILDERS AND FINANCE INCORPORATED

20 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 28, 1973

Neff v. Coach Co., 16 N.C. App. 466 , 192 S.E. 2d 587 ; Mills v. Koscot Interplanetary, 13 N.C. App. 681 , 187 S.E. 2d 372 . … of Elders v.

Dobbins v. Paul

71 N.C. App. 113 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 6, 1984

Manganello v. Permastone, Inc., 291 N.C. 666 , 231 S.E. 2d 678 (1977); Koonce v. May, 59 N.C. App. 633 , 298 S.E. 2d 69 (1982). Internal conflicts in the evidence are resolved in the plaintiffs favor. Husketh v. … Board of Architecture v. Lee, 264 N.C. 602 , 142 S.E. 2d 643 (1965). 1 He therefore was a real party in interest. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 17 of the Rules of Civil Procedure (1983); Insurance Co. v. Walker, 33 N.C.

Hodge v. North Carolina Department of Transportation

161 N.C. App. 726 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 16, 2003

Dept. of Transportation v. Hodge, 347 N.C. 602 , 499 S.E.2d 187 (1998). … See Hodge v. N.C. Dep’t. of Transportation, 137 N.C. App. 247 , 528 S.E.2d 22 (2000).

City of Monroe v. W.F. Harris Development, LLC

131 N.C. App. 22 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1998

We first note that in North Carolina State Highway Commission v. … See Board of Education of Hickory v. Seagle, 120 N.C. App. 566 , 463 S.E.2d 277 (1995), disc. review improvidently allowed, 343 N.C. 509 , 471 S.E.2d 63 (1996) (per curiam); Painter v.

Horner v. Horner

47 N.C. App. 334 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 17, 1980

Traywick v. Traywick, 28 N.C. App. 291 , 221 S.E. 2d 85 (1976); Earles v. Earles, 26 N.C. App. 559 , 216 S.E. 2d 739 (1975); Phillips v. Phillips, 9 N.C. App. 438 , 176 S.E. 2d 379 (1970). … That was an action for divorce from bed and board and alimony based on abandonment. Adultery was not at issue.

State v. Humphreys

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 31, 2020

. § 14-288.4(a)(6)); In re Brown, 150 N.C. … State v. Leigh, 278 N.C. 243, 251, 179 S.E.2d 708, 713 (1971). The State relies on State v.

Huntley v. Pandya

139 N.C. App. 624 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 15, 2000

Soles v. City of Raleigh Civil Service Comm., 345 N.C. 443, 447 , 480 S.E.2d 685, 687 (1997); see also Britt v. … Board of Commissioners, 274 N.C. 343, 352 , 163 S.E.2d 387, 394 (1968) (stating that municipal corporations are organized primarily for the purposes of local government); Bridges v.

State v. Malunda

230 N.C. App. 355 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 5, 2013

During the search, Officer Cooper found a small brown plastic bag in defendant’s pocket. … See United States v. Di Re, 332 U.S. 581, 587 , 92 L. Ed. 210 , 216 (1948) (declining to expand the ruling in Carroll v.

Childs v. Dowdy

14 N.C. App. 535 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 24, 1972

Loving v. Whitton, 241 N.C. 273 , 84 S.E. 2d 919 . See also Hout v. Harvell, 270 N.C. 274 , 154 S.E. 2d 41 ; Dolan v. Simpson, 269 N.C. 438 , 152 S.E. 2d 523 ; Moore v. … Jenkins v. Coach Co., 231 N.C. 208 , 56 S.E. 2d 571 ; Humphries v. Coach Co., 228 N.C. 399 , 45 S.E. 2d 546 ; White v. Chappell, 219 N.C. 652 , 14 S.E. 2d 843 .

Hoots v. Calaway

15 N.C. App. 346 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 2, 1972

Nissen v. Mining Co., 104 N.C., 310 , and citation in annotated edition. … Sherrill v. Hagan, 92 N.C., 349 ; McGee v. Craven, 106 N.C., 356 ; Currie v. Hawkins, 118 N.C., 595 ; Quinn v. Sexton, 125 N.C., 452 ; Brown v. Hobbs, 147 N.C., 77 .” 151 N.C., at p. 462. See also Buie v.

Dyer v. State

102 N.C. App. 480 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 2, 1991

Mayo v. Jones, 78 N.C. 406, 407 (1878). However, costs shall include attorneys fees “only if . . . [the trial court] finds that the [caveat] proceeding has substantial merit.” N.C.G.S. § 6-21(2). … Wake County Board of Ed., 292 N.C. 406, 414 , 233 S.E.2d 538, 544 (1977) (citation omitted). Here, the Caveators claim that the Testatrix did not have the necessary testamentary capacity to execute her will.

Davis v. Williams

242 N.C. App. 262 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 21, 2015

See *892 Harris v. … Id. at 511 , 714 S.E.2d at 810 ; see also Tubiolo v.

Shaffner v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

101 N.C. App. 213 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 18, 1990

An internal company appeals board upheld the termination, and plaintiff then brought this action seeking damages for wrongful discharge and reinstatement to his prior position. … Since the standard for determining the appropriateness of a motion for directed verdict and a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is the same, Dickinson v.

Steffes v. DeLapp

177 N.C. App. 802 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 6, 2006

Immediately following the shareholders’ meeting, the Board of Directors met and voted to dissolve Elkanah, although proper notice of the meeting to dissolve was not given. … Relying on Barnhouse and Appalachian Poster Advertising Co. v. Harrington, 89 N.C.