Case law

Worthington v. Bynum

53 N.C. App. 409 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 18, 1981

Bird v. Bradburn, 131 N.C. 488, 489 , 42 S.E. 936 (1902).” Id. at 634 , 231 S.E. 2d at 611 . … . *421 Land Co. v. Wood, 40 N.C. App. 133 , 252 S.E. 2d 546 (1979); Hoover v. Kleer-Pak, 33 N.C. App. 661 , 236 S.E. 2d 386 , rev. denied, 293 N.C. 360 , 237 S.E. 2d 848 (1977); Board of Transportation v.

Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Bondurant

81 N.C. App. 362 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 17, 1986

In Biggs v. … Brown v. Scism, 50 N.C. App. 619 , 274 S.E. 2d 897 , disc. rev. denied, 302 N.C. 396 , 276 S.E. 2d 919 (1981).

State v. Cox

218 N.C. App. 583 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 7, 2012

App. 520, 525 , 583 S.E.2d 680, 683 (2003) (quoting State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 569 , 313 S.E.2d 585, 589 (1984)). … (quoting State v. Fletcher, 92 N.C. App. 50, 57 , 373 S.E.2d 681, 686 (1988)).

Day v. Brant

205 N.C. App. 348 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 20, 2010

In Roush v. Kennon, 188 N.C. … Standard of care applying is a board certified ER doctor who has CAT scan available and has a surgeon available, who has nurses and paramedics available. . . .

Southern of Rocky Mount, Inc. v. Woodward Specialty Sales, Inc.

52 N.C. App. 549 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 16, 1981

Wood v. Brown, 25 N.C. App. 241 , 212 S.E. 2d 690 review denied 287 N.C. 469 , 215 S.E. 2d 626 (1975). Dr. Zorowski’s testimony related to an issue raised by the complaint. … G.S. 25-2-314; 25-2-607(4); Rose v. Motor Sales, 288 N.C. 53, 60-61 , 215 S.E. 2d 573, 577-578 (1975); Cockerham v. Ward and Astrup Co. v. West Co., 44 N.C.

Massey v. Massey

121 N.C. App. 263 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 2, 1996

See also Jackson v. Jackson, 68 N.C. … of Education v.

Chandler v. Nello L. Teer Co.

53 N.C. App. 766 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 15, 1981

See Bass v. … Bottling Co., 205 N.C. 786 , 172 S.E. 406 (1934); Parrish v. Armour & Co., 200 N.C. 654 , 158 S.E. 188 (1931); Williams v. Board of Education, 1 N.C. App. 89 , 160 S.E. 2d 102 (1968).

Murrow v. Daniels

85 N.C. App. 401 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 5, 1987

Wesley v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 47 N.C. App. 680 , 268 S.E. 2d 855 , disc. rev. denied, 301 N.C. 239 , 283 S.E. 2d 136 (1980); Sawyer v. Carter, 71 N.C. … Brown v. Scism, 50 N.C. App. 619 , 274 S.E. 2d 897 , disc. rev. denied, 302 N.C. 396 , 276 S.E. 2d 919 (1981).

In Re Alexander

581 S.E.2d 466 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 17, 2003

Mennonite Board of Missions v. Adams, 462 U.S. 791, 795 , 103 S.Ct. 2706, 2709 , 77 L.Ed.2d 180, 185 (1983) (quoting Mullane v. … Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 66 , 120 S.Ct. 2054, 2060 , 147 L.Ed.2d 49, 57 (2000). "This parental liberty interest `is perhaps the oldest of the fundamental liberty interests[.]'" Owenby v.

Intercraft Industries Corp. v. Morrison

54 N.C. App. 225 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1981

App. 340, 343-344 , 194 S.E. 2d 210, 212-213 (1973), quoting Boynton Cab Co. v. Neubeck, 237 Wis. 249 , 296 N.W. 636 (1941) (emphasis supplied). … App. at 722 , 263 S.E. 2d at 3 , quoting McLean v. Board of Review, 476 Pa. 617, 620 , 383 A. 2d 533, 535 (1978) (emphasis supplied).

Blakeney v. State

2 N.C. App. 312 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 18, 1968

State v. Brown, 266 N.C. 55 , 145 S.E. 2d 297 . Nor is proof of entry where there is proof of breaking necessary to support a conviction on a charge of breaking and entering under the statute. State v. … S. v. Smith, 240 N.C. 99 , 81 S.E. 2d 263 ; S. v. Puckett, 211 N.C. 66 , 189 S.E. 183 ; S. v. Burnett, 142 N.C. 577 ; S. v. Hart, 116 N.C. 976 ; S. v. Mundy, 182 N.C. 907 , 110 S.E. 93 ; S. v.

Payne v. Charlotte Heating & Air Conditioning

172 N.C. App. 496 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 16, 2005

See Lamb v. … Click v.

Estate of Harvey Ex Rel. Harvey v. Kore-Kut, Inc.

180 N.C. App. 195 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 7, 2006

Stat. § 97-10.2 (e) looked to prior case history before the enaction and gleaned that the statute was a mere codification of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Brown v. R.R., 204 N.C. 668 , 169 S.E. 419 (1933). … Johnson v. Southern *201 Industrial Constructors, 347 N.C. 530, 538 , 495 S.E.2d 356, 360-61 (1998); see also Radzisz v.

Royals v. Piedmont Electric Repair Co.

137 N.C. App. 700 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 2, 2000

Stat. § 55-14-30 (2)(ii) (formerly section 55-125(a)(4)) is Meiselman v. Meiselman, 309 N.C. 279 , 307 S.E.2d 551 (1983). … Compare Pooley v. Mankato Iron & Metal, Inc., 513 N.W.2d 834 (Minn. Ct.

Howlett v. CSB, LLC

164 N.C. App. 715 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 15, 2004

Mallard, however, later informed Williams that the board of CSB had decided not to lease the property due to concern over possible underground storage tanks and the parties never executed the lease agreement. … See Pee Dee Oil Co. v. Quality Oil Co., 80 N.C.

State v. Phillips

87 N.C. App. 246 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1987

The victim’s neighbor, Tim Reynolds, testified that the victim had what “looked like a board print on the side of his face,” and that “he was bloody and his eyes was bleeding. . . .” … State v. Young, 312 N.C. 669 , 325 S.E. 2d 181 (1985). This includes investigation of improprieties concerning the jury. State v. Selph, 33 N.C. App. 157 , 234 S.E. 2d 453 (1977).

Kornegay v. Aspen Asset Group, LLC

204 N.C. App. 213 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 1, 2010

that were irreconcilable with the terms approved by the Board or were in addition to those terms. … See Turner v.

In Re Petition of Smith

82 N.C. App. 107 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 15, 1986

In Hanvey v. Blankenship, 474 F. Supp. 1349 (W.D. … Ark. 1973), rev’d on other grounds, Finney v. Arkansas Board of Correction, 505 F. 2d 194 (8th Cir. 1974).

First Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Martin

44 N.C. App. 281 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 18, 1979

See, e. g., In re Development Co., 482 F.2d 243 (3rd Cir. 1973); Stretch v. Murphy, 166 Or. 439 , 112 P.2d 1018 (1941); Cameron Brown South, Inc. v. East Glen Oaks, Inc., 341 So.2d 450 (La.App.1976). … See, e. g., Saieed v. Abeyounis, 217 N.C. 644 , 9 S.E.2d 399 (1940); Davis v. Alexander, 207 N.C. 417 , 177 S.E. 417 (1934); Dillard v. Mercantile Co., 190 N.C. 225 , 129 S.E. 598 (1925); Moore v.

J. PERRY JONES REALTY, INCORPORATED v. McLamb

21 N.C. App. 482 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 15, 1974

secretary, assistant secretary, cashier, or assistant cashier), not acting in dual capacity, shall with respect to the rights of innocent *486 third parties, be as valid as if executed pursuant to authorization from the board … See also Caldwell v. Mfg. Co., 121 N.C. 339 , 28 S.E. 475 (1897); Tuttle v. Building Corp., 228 N.C. 507 , 46 S.E. 2d 313 (1948). It was error to hold that the instrument in question was a valid corporate deed.