Case law

State v. Parson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 18, 2016

Brown remained at 59 Fie Top Road. … V.

In Re Appeal of Dixie Building, LLC

235 N.C. App. 61 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 15, 2014

First Bank v. S & R Grandview, L.L.C., ___ N.C. App. ___, ___, 755 S.E.2d 393, 394 (2014). … Spiers v. Davenport, 263 N.C. 56, 59, 138 S.E.2d 762, 764 (1964). See also N.C. Gen.

Clark v. City of Asheboro

136 N.C. App. 114 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 21, 1999

See Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, 284 N.C. 458, 467 , 202 S.E.2d 129, 135 (1974). … Woodhouse v. Board of Commissioners, 299 N.C. 211, 216 , 261 S.E.2d 882, 886 (1980); see also, Book Stores v. City of Raleigh, 53 N.C. App. 753 , 281 S.E.2d 761 (1981).

CAMPBELL UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED v. Harnett County

162 N.C. App. 178 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 6, 2004

P. 25(b); Wiseman v. Wiseman, 68 N.C. App. 252, 255 , 314 S.E.2d 566, 567-68 (1984) (“failure to follow the rules subjects an appeal to dismissal”).

State v. Bentley

1 N.C. App. 365 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 12, 1968

This Court stated in State v. Brown, 1 N.C. App. 145 , 160 S.E. 2d 508 , that the trial judge has wide discretionary power with respect to the introduction of further evidence at the trial. … Parker, C.J., in an exhaustive opinion, held in the case of Gasque v.

Mitchell v. Pruden

251 N.C. App. 554 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 17, 2017

MITCHELL V. … On 16 July 2013, a motion was made to approve the SBCS conditioned upon a change in the CDS Board.

Donnelly v. University of North Carolina

236 N.C. App. 32 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 2, 2014

(citing Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School Dist., 393 U.S. 503, 505, 21 L.Ed.2d 731 (1969); Brown v. Louisiana, 383 U.S. 131, 141–42, 15 L.Ed.2d 637 (1966); United States v. … Thorne v.

O'DONNELL v. City of Asheville

113 N.C. App. 178 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 21, 1993

See Mullen v. Town of Louisburg, 225 N.C. 53, 61 , 33 S.E.2d 484, 489 (1945) (court will not interfere with local administrative board’s discretion until a complainant’s legal right is infringed). … See, e.g., Wayne County Bd. of Educ. v. Lewis, 231 N.C. 661 , 58 S.E.2d 725 (1950); Henry v. North Carolina Dept. of Transp., 44 N.C.

State v. Orr

48 N.C. App. 723 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 16, 1980

Brown as a witness in his behalf. He testified that he lived in Robbinsville. Counsel for defendant asked Mr. Brown whether he knew Mrs. Starnes, the prosecuting witness. … S. v. Parks, 25 N.C., 296 ; S. v. Perkins, 66 N.C., 126 ; S. v. Gee, 92 N.C., 756 ; S. v. Wheeler, 104 N.C., 893 ; S. v. Coley, 114 N.C., 879 , and numerous other cases since.

Emerson v. Cape Fear Country Club, Inc.

259 N.C. App. 755 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 5, 2018

The Board received letters on Emerson’s behalf from other Club members -4-  EMERSON V. CAPE FEAR COUNTRY CLUB, INC. … board.

Graham v. Mock

143 N.C. App. 315 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 1, 2001

Hall v. Board of Elections, 280 N.C. 600, 605 , 187 S.E.2d 52, 55 (1972). … Sneed v. Board of Education, 299 N.C. 609, 618 , 264 S.E.2d 106, 113 (1980) (citations omitted).

Little v. City of Locust

83 N.C. App. 224 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 4, 1986

Practice and Procedure in Civil Cases Secs. 705, 706 (1929); Gidney v. Hallsey, 9 N.C. 550 (1823). The procedure devised was simple and expeditious and none of the statutes approving its use have changed it. … was inappropriate and treated the suit as a petition for certiorari Deffet Rentals, Inc. v.

Bowens v. BD. OF LAW EXAMINERS, ETC.

57 N.C. App. 78 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 4, 1982

Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed. 2d 796 (1957). … Tyler v. Vickery, 5 Cir. 1975, 517 F. 2d 1089, 1102-03 ; Whitfield v. Illinois Board of Law Examiners, 7 Cir. 1974, 504 F. 2d 474 , 476-77 n. 5; Feldman v.

Akers v. City of Mount Airy

175 N.C. App. 777 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 7, 2006

Veazey v. City of Durham, 231 N.C. 357, 362 , 57 S.E.2d 377, 381 (1950). … App. at 504 , 462 S.E.2d at 698 (1995) (appeal of superior court’s remand to a licensing board for rehearing dismissed as interlocutory); Jennewein v. City Council of the City of Wilmington, 46 N.C.

State v. Hines

122 N.C. App. 545 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 4, 1996

State v. Petersilie, 334 N.C. 169, 179-80 , 432 S.E.2d 832, 838 (1993). County boards of elections, and their members, have clearly been delegated election duties by our legislature. See N.C. Gen. … State v. Hicks, 241 N.C. 156, 159 , 84 S.E.2d 545, 547 (1954).

Cochran v. Piedmont Publishing Co.

62 N.C. App. 548 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 7, 1983

In order to recover compensatory damages for libel, plaintiff must first establish that the caption beneath the photograph contained false information, Brown v. Boney, 41 N.C. … Brown v. Boney, 41 N.C. App. at 648 , 255 S.E. 2d at 791 , quoting Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 339-40 , 94 S.Ct. 2997, 3007 , 41 L.Ed. 2d 789, 805 (1974).

Spoon v. Spoon

233 N.C. App. 38 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 18, 2014

As such, Defendant, citing Tucker v. … Evans v. Evans, 138 N.C. App. 135, 140, 530 S.E.2d 576, 579 (2000); see Harrington v. Harrington, 16 N.C.

In re: Lowe's Home Ctrs.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 7, 2020

Lowe’s concludes, “[g]iven that the Board did not even discuss Section 105-287 or the Union County [S]chedule of [V]alues, the Commission properly concluded that the Board did not intend to ‘correct an appraisal error … resulting from a misapplication’ of the [S]chedule of [V]alues” at the time of the 2017 Revaluation.

The Estate of Nathan Richard Coppick v. Hobbs Marina Properties, LLC

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 7, 2015

Stat. § 87- 10(b) (2013) (“Application for license [for General Contractors]” “(b) The Board shall conduct an examination . . . of all applicants for license to ascertain . . . … As defendant concedes, our Supreme Court previously addressed this issue in Brown v. Flowe, 349 N.C. 520, 507 S.E.2d 894 (1998).

In re the Petition of Central Telephone Company Concerning the Allocation Formula for Corporate Income Tax Purposes for the Year Ended December 31, 1991

167 N.C. App. 14 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 16, 2004

Duke v. … In Coca-Cola Co. v.