Case law

New Hanover County v. Pleasant

59 N.C. App. 644 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 7, 1982

To allow a collateral attack on this unappealed Board decision would make the decision meaningless. The facts of this case are similar to the facts in Durham County v. … The decision of the Board of Adjustment is not subject to collateral attack. As stated by Adams, J., in S. v.

In Re the Appeal From the Issuance of a Cama Minor Development Permit No. 82-0010

82 N.C. App. 32 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 15, 1986

In Adams v. … In Heaton v.

Privette v. Privette

30 N.C. App. 305 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 4, 1976

Brown v. Brown, 171 Kan. 249 , 232 P. 2d 603, 605-606 (1951). We consider the reasoning in Brown correct and adopt its interpretation of the law in this area. … See: Eudy v. Eudy, 288 N.C. 71 , 215 S.E. 2d 782 (1975). Cf: Newsome v. Newsome, 22 N.C. App. 651 , 207 S.E. 2d 355 (1974); Manning v. Manning, 20 N.C. App. 149 , 201 S.E. 2d 46 (1973).

Adkins v. STANLY COUNTY BD. OF EDUC.

692 S.E.2d 470 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 4, 2010

See Wood v. … Pratt v.

Lynch v. Lynch

74 N.C. App. 540 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 7, 1985

Overton v. Overton, supra (quoting Ledford v. Ledford, 229 N.C. 373 , 49 S.E. 2d 794 (1948)); Howard v. Boyce, supra. … Overton v. Overton, supra and Howard v. Boyce, supra.

Mayo v. North Carolina State University

168 N.C. App. 503 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 15, 2005

Capital Outdoor, Inc. v. Guilford County Board of Adjustment, 152 N.C. App. 474, 475 , 567 S.E.2d 440, 441 (2002). … State University Board of Trustees.”

Baker v. Town of Rose Hill

126 N.C. App. 338 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 20, 1997

Concrete Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 299 N.C. 620, 626 , 265 S.E.2d 379, 383 , rehearing denied, 300 N.C. 562 , 270 S.E.2d 106 (1980). … CG & T Corp. v. Bd. of Adjustment of Wilmington, 105 N.C. App. 32, 40 , 411 S.E.2d 655, 660 (1992).

In re: J.B.

257 N.C. App. 299 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 2, 2018

State v. Smith , 186 N.C. … If so, the motion is properly denied.' " State v. Fritsch , 351 N.C. 373 , 378, 526 S.E.2d 451 , 455 (quoting State v.

Hickory Orthopaedic Center, P.A. v. Nicks

179 N.C. App. 281 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 5, 2006

Johnson v. Bd. ofTrs. of Durham Tech. Cmty. College, 157 N.C. … Atchley Grading Co. v. W. Cabarrus Church, 148 N.C. App. 211, 212-13 ; 557 S.E.2d 188, 189 (2001); Wilson v. Wilson, 134 N.C. App. 642, 643 , 518 S.E.2d 255, 256 (1999).

Central Telephone Co. v. Tolson

174 N.C. App. 554 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 15, 2005

It is a “well-settled rule that a statute’s constitutionality shall be determined by the judiciary, not an administrative board.” Meads v. … Bailey v. State, 330 N.C. 227, 235 , 412 S.E.2d 295, 300 (1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 911 , 118 L. Ed. 2d 547 (1992), overruled in part on other grounds by Bailey v.

State v. Orr

48 N.C. App. 723 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 16, 1980

Brown as a witness in his behalf. He testified that he lived in Robbinsville. Counsel for defendant asked Mr. Brown whether he knew Mrs. Starnes, the prosecuting witness. … S. v. Parks, 25 N.C., 296 ; S. v. Perkins, 66 N.C., 126 ; S. v. Gee, 92 N.C., 756 ; S. v. Wheeler, 104 N.C., 893 ; S. v. Coley, 114 N.C., 879 , and numerous other cases since.

Early v. County of Durham Department of Social Services

172 N.C. App. 344 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 16, 2005

Hasty told Brown that her unit could only handle Early’s caseload through 13 December 2000 without there being a hardship on her unit. Brown and Hasty then recommended to DSS’ director, Daniel C. … Servs. v. Hovis, 150 N.C.

Glenn-Robinson v. Acker

140 N.C. App. 606 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 5, 2000

Shore v. Brown, 324 N.C. 427, 428 , 378 S.E.2d 778, 779 (1989). A. Section 1983 claims Preliminarily, we note “a municipal entity has no claim to immunity in a section 1983 suit.” Moore v. … Board of Comm’rs of Bryan City v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 405 , 137 L. Ed. 2d 626, 640 (1997); see also Spell, 824 F.2d at 1388 (plaintiff must prove an “affirmative link” between the custom and the violation).

Grissom v. North Carolina Department of Revenue

28 N.C. App. 277 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 7, 1976

Article 1 of Chapter 126 of the General Statutes creates the State Personnel Board (the Board). … State v. Humphries, 210 N.C. 406 , 186 S.E. 473 (1936).

Medford v. Davis

62 N.C. App. 308 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 17, 1983

Brown v. Neal, 283 N.C. 604 , 197 S.E. 2d 505 (1973). Assuming, arguendo, that the objection was taken in apt time, we hold Medford’s testimony concerning the operation of the vehicle to be admissible. … State v. Brown, 26 N.C. App. 314 , 215 S.E. 2d 802 (1975); see 1 Brandis on N.C. Evidence § 125 (1982).

Jacobs v. City of Asheville

137 N.C. App. 441 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 18, 2000

Russ v. Board of Education, 232 N.C. 128, 130 , 59 S.E.2d 589, 591 (1950) (citations omitted) (emphasis in original). … Russ v. Board of Education, 232 N.C. at 130 , 59 S.E.2d at 591 .

State v. Crabtree

126 N.C. App. 729 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 15, 1997

Majebe v. North Carolina Board of Med. Exam., 106 N.C. App. 253, 260-61 , 416 S.E.2d 404, 408 , dismissal allowed and disc. review denied, 332 N.C. 484 , 421 S.E.2d 355 (1992) (citation omitted). … At trial, the State offered the testimony of Wade Brown. Wade Brown was employed by Dana’s Beach Bingo for three years and was employed there during the investigation.

Bowens v. BD. OF LAW EXAMINERS, ETC.

57 N.C. App. 78 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 4, 1982

Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed. 2d 796 (1957). … Tyler v. Vickery, 5 Cir. 1975, 517 F. 2d 1089, 1102-03 ; Whitfield v. Illinois Board of Law Examiners, 7 Cir. 1974, 504 F. 2d 474 , 476-77 n. 5; Feldman v.

Couch v. North Carolina Employment Security Commission

89 N.C. App. 405 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 5, 1988

Robertson v. Brown, 139 So. 2d 226 (La. App. 1962). … Corp. v. Board of Review, Etc., 122 N.J. Super. 366 , 300 A. 2d 572 (1973) (per curiam) (wage reduction from $4.27 an hour to $3.35 an hour was good cause); Edwards v. Commonwealth, Unemp. Comp. Bd. of Rev., 35 Pa.

Cochran v. Piedmont Publishing Co.

62 N.C. App. 548 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 7, 1983

In order to recover compensatory damages for libel, plaintiff must first establish that the caption beneath the photograph contained false information, Brown v. Boney, 41 N.C. … Brown v. Boney, 41 N.C. App. at 648 , 255 S.E. 2d at 791 , quoting Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 339-40 , 94 S.Ct. 2997, 3007 , 41 L.Ed. 2d 789, 805 (1974).