Case law

State v. Crooms

261 N.C. App. 230 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 4, 2018

The Board argues that the petition for remission did not provide statutorily required evidence to support the Surety’s motion, and in partially granting  STATE V. … The trial court then ordered the Board to remit $7,500.00 to the Surety. -4-  STATE V.

Kentallen, Inc. v. Town of Hillsborough

110 N.C. App. 767 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 6, 1993

Allen v. City of Burlington Bd. of Adjustment, 100 N.C. App. 615, 618 , 397 S.E.2d 657, 659 (1990). … Ziegler, Jr., Rathkopfs The Law of Zoning and Planning §§ 43.02[1], 43.03[1] (1993) [hereinafter Rathkopfs]; see Jackson v.

Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance

44 N.C. App. 210 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 18, 1979

Roy Johnson stated in his deposition that on 27 November 1973, at the time Phoenix offered to amend its previous loan commitment, “we had been assured by the people at Cameron-Brown that this would be one of the contingencies … Hardy v. Toler, 288 N.C. 303 , 218 S.E. 2d 342 (1975).

State v. Hinnant

255 N.C. App. 785 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 3, 2017

In State v. Adams , 220 N.C. … See Pelham Realty Corp. v.

GUILFORD COUNTY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT v. Simmons

102 N.C. App. 325 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 19, 1991

In Durham County v. Addison, 262 N.C. 280 , 136 S.E.2d 600 (1964), the defendant appealed to the Board of Adjustment for a variance after he had been denied a building permit. … Our Courts have consistently required litigants aggrieved by decisions of Boards of Adjustment to seek relief as mandated by statute. See City of Hickory v. Catawba Valley Machinery Co., 39 N.C.

In Re the Appeal of Moravian Home, Inc.

95 N.C. App. 324 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1989

In turn the county board’s decisions may be appealed to the Property Tax Commission. Brock v. Property Tax Comm., 290 N.C. 731 , 228 S.E.2d 254 (1976). … Pardue, the Tax Assessor, was not a member of the Board of County Commissioners or the Board of Equalization and Review.

State v. Nolan

211 N.C. App. 109 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 19, 2011

As with all seizures, checkpoints conform with the Fourth Amendment only ‘if they are reasonable.’ ” State v. Rose, 170 N.C. App. 284, 288 , 612 S.E.2d 336, 339 (2005) (quoting State v. … “In order to make this determination, this Court has required application of the three-prong test set out by the United States Supreme Court in Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 50 , 61 L. Ed. 2d 357, 361 , 99 S.

Matter of Kozy

91 N.C. App. 342 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1988

Co. v. Ingram, 63 N.C. App. 38 , 303 S.E. 2d 649 , cert. denied, 309 N.C. 819 , 310 S.E. 2d 348 (1983). … In re Dailey v. North Carolina State Bd. of Dental Examiners, 60 N.C. App. 441 , 299 S.E. 2d 473 , rev’d on other grounds, 309 N.C. 710 , 309 S.E. 2d 219 (1983).

State v. McCarn

151 N.C. App. 742 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 6, 2002

The Watauga County Board of Education (Judgment Creditor) is the judgment creditor and appellee in the present case by virtue of its opportunity to be heard pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 15A-544 (1999) (repealed Jan. 1, 2001). … State v. Vikre, 86 N.C. App. 196, 199 , 356 S.E.2d 802, 804 (1987), disc. review denied, 320 N.C. 637 , 360 S.E.2d 103 (1987) (citations omitted).

Stann v. Levine

180 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 7, 2006

Brown v. Brown, 353 N.C. 220, 224 , 539 S.E.2d 621, 623 (2000) (noting that “[although the title of an act cannot control when the text is clear, the title is an indication of legislative intent.” (citations omitted)). … This statute abrogated the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Brown, which held an equitable distribution claim abated upon the death of a party.” (citations omitted)).

In re: J.B.

257 N.C. App. 299 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 2, 2018

State v. Smith , 186 N.C. … If so, the motion is properly denied.' " State v. Fritsch , 351 N.C. 373 , 378, 526 S.E.2d 451 , 455 (quoting State v.

State v. Solomon

117 N.C. App. 701 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 7, 1995

However, in Dowling v. … State v.

Community Projects for Students, Inc. v. Wilder

60 N.C. App. 182 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 21, 1982

Keith v. Henderson County, 204 N.C. 21 , 167 S.E. 481 (1933); compare O’Grady v. Bank, 296 N.C. 212 , 250 S.E. 2d 587 (1978). … Defendant Board of Education alone had authority to ratify the sale of plaintiffs goods to the school and, therefore, plaintiffs theory of ratification is of no avail to it in this action. See Equipment Co. v.

Jones (Griffin) v. Rochelle

125 N.C. App. 82 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 7, 1997

Board of Transportation on 2 February, 1990. The sign was not a regulatory sign, wherein a failure to obey the sign is a violation of the traffic law. *87 In Davis v. Jessup and Carroll v. … State v. Brown, 280 N.C. 588, 597 , 187 S.E.2d 85, 91 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 870 , 34 L. Ed. 2d 121 (1972).

Morris v. Thomas

161 N.C. App. 680 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 16, 2003

Norman v. Nash Johnson & Sons’ Farms, Inc., 140 N.C. App. 390, 395 , 537 S.E.2d 248, 253 (2000). See Stewart v. Kopp, 118 N.C. … McKinney v. Richitelli, 357 N.C. 483, 487 , 586 S.E.2d 258, 262 (2003) (citing Utilities Comm. v. Edmisten, Atty. General, 291 N.C. 451 , 232 S.E.2d 184 (1977)).

State v. Williams

725 S.E.2d 7 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 7, 2012

State v. Largent, 197 N.C.App. 614, 617 , 677 S.E.2d 514, 517 (2009) (quoting In Re Proposed Assessments v. Jefferson-Pilot, 161 N.C.App. 558, 559-60 , 589 S.E.2d 179, 180-81 (2003)). … Here, the Board did not give notice of appeal and did not raise an alternative basis in law. In CDC Pineville, LLC v.

Pope v. Davidson Cnty.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 7, 2023

POPE V. … POPE V.

State v. Jones

53 N.C. App. 466 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 18, 1981

In State v. Brown and State v. … We realize that our opinion in the case sub judice is inconsistent with State v. Brown, supra. We believe the trend in the *471 cases decided by our Supreme Court is such that Brown no longer. governs.

Multimedia Publishing of North Carolina, Inc. v. Henderson County

145 N.C. App. 365 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 7, 2001

Publishing Co. v. Board of Education, 29 N.C. App. 37, 47 , 223 S.E.2d 580, 587 (1976). This is so notwithstanding the countervailing policy favoring confidentiality between attorneys and clients. … Fisher v. Maricopa County Stadium Dist., 912 P.2d 1345, 1353 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1995) ....

Cobb Ex Rel. Knight v. Town of Blowing Rock

213 N.C. App. 88 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 5, 2011

. *733 Brown Moore & Associates, PLLC, by R. Kent Brown, for Plaintiffs-appellants. Clawson & Staubes, PLLC, by Andrew J. Santaniello and Michael J. Kitson, for Defendant-appellee. Poisson, Poisson & Bower, PLLC, by E. … Hutchens v. Southard, 254 N.C. 428 , 119 S.E.2d 205 [(1961)]; Adams v. State Board of Education, 248 N.C. 506 , 103 S.E.2d 854 [(1958)].