Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncctapp

9,157 results

1.03s

  • Moore v. COVENANT TRANSPORT, INC.

    181 N.C. App. 607 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 6, 2007

    Brown, Crump, Vanore & Tierney LLP, by Andrew A. Vanore, III and W. John Cathcart, Jr., for defendant-appellee. CALABRIA, Judge. Glen B. … Plaintiff relies upon Perkins v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Izydore v. City of Durham

    228 N.C. App. 397 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 6, 2013

    See Coomer v. Lee County Bd. of Educ.,_N.C. … See Cunningham v. Catawba County, 128 N.C.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Templeton Properties LP v. TOWN OF BOONE

    198 N.C. App. 406 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 21, 2009

    TEMPLETON PROPERTIES LP, Petitioner v. TOWN OF BOONE and TOWN OF BOONE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, Respondents No. … NOTES [1] Batch v. Town of Chapel Hill, 326 N.C. 1, 11-12 , 387 S.E.2d 655, 662 (1990) (citing Jamison v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re the Appeal of Moravian Home, Inc.

    95 N.C. App. 324 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1989

    In turn the county board’s decisions may be appealed to the Property Tax Commission. Brock v. Property Tax Comm., 290 N.C. 731 , 228 S.E.2d 254 (1976). … Pardue, the Tax Assessor, was not a member of the Board of County Commissioners or the Board of Equalization and Review.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Harts Book Stores, Inc. v. City of Raleigh

    53 N.C. App. 753 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 15, 1981

    Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, 284 N.C. 458, 467 , 202 S.E. 2d 129, 135 (1974); see also In re Application of Ellis, 277 N.C. 419, 425 , 178 S.E. 2d 77, 80 (1970). … Jackson v. Board of Adjustment, 275 N.C. 155, 165 , 166 S.E. 2d 78, 85 (1969).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Casper v. Chatham County

    186 N.C. App. 456 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 16, 2007

    Stat. § 153A-340(cl) (2005) (providing that “the board of adjustment, the planning board, or the board of commissioners may issue special use permits or conditional use permits”); N.C. Gen. Stat. § 153A-345(b) (2005). … Kentallen, Inc. v. Hillsborough, 110 N.C. App. 767, 769 , 4331 S.E.2d 231 , 232 (1993). 2 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Webb v. City of Raleigh

    88 N.C. App. 480 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 19, 1988

    Plaintiff Steve Webb t/a Snoopy’s, Solomon Brown t/a Brown Alignment Service, and Byrd’s Mobile Unit, Inc. t/a the Dairy Freeze brought an action against the City of Raleigh on 13 July 1979 challenging the constitutionality … See Rose’s Stores, Inc. v. Tarrytown Center, Inc., 270 N.C. 206, 212 , 154 S.E. 2d 313, 317 (1967). Webb did not violate the 20 November 1981 order. Judgment is vacated. Judges Eagles and Cozort concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Tong v. Dunn

    231 N.C. App. 491 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 17, 2013

    In Curl v. Am. Multimedia, Inc., 187 N.C. … See also Goodman v. Holmes & McLaurin Attorneys at Law, 192 N.C.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Blevins v. Town of West Jefferson

    182 N.C. App. 675 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 17, 2007

    Background On 26 April 2006, the trial court entered an order reversing the decision of the Town of West Jefferson Board of Adjustment. … The heading on the notice in the record on appeal contains a “notice of appeal” from the “BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT.”

    Reversed by Blevins v. Town of West Jefferson, 361 N.C. 578 (2007)Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Anderson v. Assimos

    146 N.C. App. 339 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 2, 2001

    Brown at North Carolina Baptist Hospital. ... Dr. Brown put water in [Plaintiff’s] ears and she could not feel the water. Dr. Brown asked [Plaintiff] . . . what medicine she had been given. ... At the time . . . … Elam, 302 N.C. 157, 161 , 273 S.E.2d 661, 664 (1981); see also State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179, 211 , 358 S.E.2d 1, 22 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 98 L. Ed. 2d 406 (1987); State v.

    Vacated on other grounds by Anderson v. Assimos, 356 N.C. 415 (2002)Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance

    44 N.C. App. 210 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 18, 1979

    Roy Johnson stated in his deposition that on 27 November 1973, at the time Phoenix offered to amend its previous loan commitment, “we had been assured by the people at Cameron-Brown that this would be one of the contingencies … Hardy v. Toler, 288 N.C. 303 , 218 S.E. 2d 342 (1975).

    Reversed on other grounds by Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance, 300 N.C. 247 (1980)Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Nolan

    211 N.C. App. 109 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 19, 2011

    As with all seizures, checkpoints conform with the Fourth Amendment only ‘if they are reasonable.’ ” State v. Rose, 170 N.C. App. 284, 288 , 612 S.E.2d 336, 339 (2005) (quoting State v. … “In order to make this determination, this Court has required application of the three-prong test set out by the United States Supreme Court in Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 50 , 61 L. Ed. 2d 357, 361 , 99 S.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Silvers v. Horace Mann Insurance

    90 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 3, 1988

    Defendant cites Brown v. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co., 285 N.C. 313 , 204 S.E. 2d 829 (1974) and Buchanan v. Buchanan, 83 N.C. … Brown, 285 N.C. at 319-20 , 204 S.E. 2d at 834 .

    Modified by Silvers v. Horace Mann Insurance, 324 N.C. 289 (1989)Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Jackson v. N.C. Dep't of Commerce

    242 N.C. App. 328 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 21, 2015

    Quick v. United Ben. Life Ins., 287 N.C. 47 , 59, 213 S.E.2d 563 , 570 (1975). See also Skipper v. Yow, 249 N.C. 49 , 56, 105 S.E.2d 205 , 210 (1958) ; State v. … See Nantz v. Emp't Sec.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Multimedia Publishing of North Carolina, Inc. v. Henderson County

    145 N.C. App. 365 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 7, 2001

    Publishing Co. v. Board of Education, 29 N.C. App. 37, 47 , 223 S.E.2d 580, 587 (1976). This is so notwithstanding the countervailing policy favoring confidentiality between attorneys and clients. … Fisher v. Maricopa County Stadium Dist., 912 P.2d 1345, 1353 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1995) ....

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Crooms

    261 N.C. App. 230 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 4, 2018

    The Board argues that the petition for remission did not provide statutorily required evidence to support the Surety’s motion, and in partially granting STATE V. … The trial court then ordered the Board to remit $7,500.00 to the Surety. -4- STATE V.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Henderson

    71 N.C. App. 366 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 20, 1984

    The Beaufort County Board of Education is a corporate body which has a legal existence separate and apart from its members. See G.S. 115C-40; Edwards v. … Board of Education, 235 N.C. 345 , 70 S.E. 2d 170 *371 (1952); McLaughlin v. Beasley, 250 N.C. 221 , 108 S.E. 2d 226 (1959).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Am. Mech., Inc. v. Bostic

    245 N.C. App. 133 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 2, 2016

    See Estate of Browne v. … P. 18 (setting forth requirements for taking appeal "from administrative agencies, boards, or commissions"); Strezinski v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Industrial Circuits Co. v. Terminal Communications, Inc.

    26 N.C. App. 536 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 16, 1975

    Springs Co. v. Buggy Co., 148 N.C. 533 , 62 S.E. 637 ; Clements v. … boards.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • State v. Moore

    152 N.C. App. 156 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 6, 2002

    See State v. Woods, 26 N.C. … See State v. Crawford, 104 N.C.

    Cited 18 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.