Case law

Parker v. Erixon

123 N.C. App. 383 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 6, 1996

v. … Brown, 227 N.C. at 302 , 42 S.E.2d at 73 . The Supreme Court addressed the question of whether Brown was an independent contractor or an employee for workers’ compensation purposes.

State v. Caraway

175 N.C. App. 795 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 7, 2006

Defendant, Spane and Brown got out of the car. The four men then robbed Ben and Buchanan at gunpoint. … State v. Barfield, 127 N.C. App. 399, 401 , 489 S.E.2d 905, 907 (1997) (citing State v. Davis, 101 N.C. App. 409, 411 , 399 S.E.2d 371, 372 (1991)).

City of Asheville v. Aly

233 N.C. App. 620 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 6, 2014

While the Civil Service Act — as originally enacted — did not provide a mechanism for judicial review of the Board’s decisions, Jacobs v. City of Asheville, 137 N.C. … Koufman v.

State v. Powell

109 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 16, 1993

State v. Cope, 204 N.C. 28, 31 , 167 S.E. 456, 458 (1933); State v. Wilkerson, 295 N.C. 559, 582 , 247 S.E.2d 905, 916-17 (1978). … Id.; see also 3 Fowler V.

Cook v. UNION ZONING BD. OF ADJUSTMENT

649 S.E.2d 458 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 4, 2007

"[A]ny person aggrieved" has standing to appeal the decision of a board of *466 adjustment pursuant to N.C. Gen.Stat. § 153A-345(b) (2003). See Lloyd v. … Heery v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 61 N.C.App. 612, 613 , 300 S.E.2d 869, 870 (1983) (internal citations and quotations omitted).

In Re Roberts

150 N.C. App. 86 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 7, 2002

Warren County Bd. of Educ. v. Wilkinson, 500 So.2d 455, 459 (Miss. 1986) (citing Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202, 217 , 72 L. Ed. 2d 786 (1982); Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497, 500 , 98 L. Ed. 2d 884 (1954); Pierce v. … See Givens v. Poe, 346 F.

Brooks v. Ansco & Associates, Inc.

114 N.C. App. 711 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 17, 1994

Fuel Co., v. … See N.C.G.S. § 95-135(i) (1993) (requiring the Review Board to enter findings of fact “on all the material issues of fact, law, or discretion presented on the record”); see also Coble v.

William Brewster Co. v. Town of Huntersville

161 N.C. App. 132 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 4, 2003

Co. v. Bd. of Aldermen, 284 N.C. 458, 468 , 202 S.E.2d 129, 136 (1974). … Because the Town Board did not present substantial evidence contra, the Town Board’s decision to deny the subdivision sketch plan was not supported by competent, material and substantial evidence, See Clark v.

Sanchez v. Town of Beaufort

211 N.C. App. 574 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 3, 2011

A decision which lacks a rational basis — where there is no substantial relationship between the facts disclosed by the record and conclusions reached by the board — is also termed ‘arbitrary.’ ” Godfrey v. … See Ballas v. Town of Weaverville, 121 N.C.

State v. Spann

199 N.C. App. 617 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 1, 2009

State v. Chapman, 359 N.C. 328, 374 , 611 S.E.2d 794, 827 (2005). … State v. Frazier, 319 N.C. 388, 390 , 354 S.E.2d 475, 477 (1987).

Canadian American Ass'n of Professional Baseball, Ltd. v. Rapidz

213 N.C. App. 15 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 21, 2011

Capps v. Virrey, 184 N.C. App. 267, 272 , 645 S.E.2d 825, 829 (2007). … Our conclusion is in accord with Parke Construction Co. v.

State v. Tanner

193 N.C. App. 150 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 7, 2008

Detective Bargfrede discovered that Reliable Loan had purchased a pair of hair clippers from Jeanette Brown (“Brown”). … State v. Brown, 85 N.C. App. 583, 589 , 355 S.E.2d 225, 229 (citation omitted), disc. rev. denied, 320 N.C. 172 , 358 S.E.2d 57 (1987).

State v. Williamson

74 N.C. App. 114 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 2, 1985

State v. Bell, 270 N.C. 25 , 153 S.E. 2d 741 (1967). … See State v. Maines, supra. As the District of Columbia Court of Appeals stated in United States v.

Baxter v. Poe

42 N.C. App. 404 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 31, 1979

In addressing these contentions, we rely in large measure on the opinion of this Court by Judge (now Chief Judge) Morris in Thompson v. Board of Education, 31 N.C. … Universal Camera Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 340 U.S. 474 , 95 L.Ed. 456 , 71 S.Ct. 456 (1951); Underwood v.

Rainey v. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction

181 N.C. App. 666 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 20, 2007

Transp., Inc. v. N.C. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., 162 N.C. … Department of Correction v. Hill, 313 N.C. 481, 458-86 , 329 S.E.2d 377, 379-80 (1985).

Morgan v. Nash County

224 N.C. App. 60 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 4, 2012

Plaintiffs cite Wally v. … See Bell v. Martin, 43 N.C.

Cablevision of Winston-Salem, Inc. v. City of Winston-Salem

3 N.C. App. 252 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 18, 1968

G.S. 1-277; Board of Elders v. Jones, 273 N.C. 174 , 159 S.E. 2d 545 ; Conference v. Creech, 256 N.C. 128 , 123 S.E. 2d 619 . … Realty Corp. v. Kalman, 272 N.C. 201 , 159 S.E. 2d 193 ; Milk Commission v. Food Stores, 270 N.C. 323 , 154 S.E. 2d 548 ; Conference v. Creech, supra.

Hammonds v. Lumbee River Electric Membership Corp.

178 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 20, 2006

Broderick v. Broderick, 175 N.C. … Distributors v. Dorsey, 170 N.C.

Orange County v. Department of Transportation

46 N.C. App. 350 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 6, 1980

Newton v. … V.

Bigley v. Lombardo

90 N.C. App. 79 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 3, 1988

The Ross Realty and Chemical Bank analysis, however, conflicted with the rationale of an earlier Supreme Court decision, Brown v. Kirkpatrick, 217 N.C. 486 , 8 S.E. 2d 601 (1940). … The court “expressly rejected] the reasoning of Brown”; however, it noted that the result in Brown might be correct since the deed of trust “was not a ‘purchase-money deed of trust under G.S. 45-21.38.’ Childers v.