Case law

Van-Go Transp., Inc. v. Sampson Cnty.

254 N.C. App. 836 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 1, 2017

Guilford County Board of Elections, 342 N.C. 856, 467 S.E.2d 681 (1996), the plaintiffs filed suit to compel the Guilford County Board of Elections to extend voting hours on Election Day in November 1990. … The trial court denied the board’s request for -9-  VAN-GO TRANSP., INC. V. SAMPSON CTY.

Miller v. SZILAGYI

221 N.C. App. 79 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 5, 2012

See Flitt v. Flitt, 149 N.C. … Brown v. Ellis, _N.C. App. _, _, 696 S.E.2d 813, 819 (2010), disc. review denied, 365 N.C. 209 , 709 S.E.2d 928 (2011).

Torres v. McClain

140 N.C. App. 238 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 3, 2000

Walters v. Watters, 307 N.C. 381 , 298 S.E.2d 338 (1983); Cavenaugh v. Cavenaugh, 317 N.C. 652 , 347 S.E.2d 19 (1986); Grover v. Norris, 137 N.C. App. 487 , 529 S.E.2d 231 (2000); Crane v. Green, 114 N.C. … Blount v. Blount, 72 N.C. App. 193 , 323 S.E.2d 738 (1984); Altman v. Munns, 82 N.C. App. 102 , 345 S.E.2d 419 (1986).

Hunter-Rainey v. N.C. Cent. Univ.

782 S.E.2d 122 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 2, 2016

Thompson v. Union Cty.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 7, 2022

¶ 18 The Superior Court is not the trier of fact; that is the function of the town board. Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co., Inc. v. … See Browning-Ferris Industries of South Atlantic, Inc. v. Guilford County Bd. of Adjustment, 126 N.C. App. 168, 171, 484 S.E.2d 411, 414 (1997).

Harper v. City of Asheville

160 N.C. App. 209 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 2, 2003

In neither case did this Court base its decision on the Board’s finding of a lack of jurisdiction. See also Warren v. City of Asheville, 74 N.C. … See, e.g., Raleigh Rescue Mission, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment of City of Raleigh, 153 N.C.

In re Suttles Surveying, P.A.

227 N.C. App. 70 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 7, 2013

Because Appellant does not allege that the Board’s findings were unsupported by competent evidence in the record, the Board’s findings of fact are binding on Appeal. See N. C. State Bar v. McLaurin, 169 N.C. … data recorded on the map. *77 Appellant cites Blaylock Grading Co. v.

State v. Crandell

247 N.C. App. 771 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 7, 2016

This case is distinguishable both from [State v. Fleming, 106 N.C. App. 165, 415 S.E.2d 782 (1992)] and from [Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 61 L. … Supreme Court in Brown was careful to distinguish the facts in - 17 -  STATE V.

Godsey v. Poe

36 N.C. App. 682 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 20, 1978

Accordingly, the question of whether the Open Meetings Law, G.S. 143-318.1, et seq. is applicable to local school boards is not before us at this time. In this connection see Student Bar Association v. … Stevenson v.

State v. Latham

157 N.C. App. 480 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 6, 2003

In contrast, defendant attempted to elicit testimony from Teresa Brown (“Brown”) as to her opinion whether defendant was the type of person who would feel remorse for shooting and killing Wylene. … If Brown’s opinion had been based on first hand observations, it may have been admissible as a shorthand statement of fact under Rule 701. See State v.

State v. Andrews

52 N.C. App. 26 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 19, 1981

We have become advertent to Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 , 53 L.Ed. 2d 187 (1977), and do not find it controlling. … As we previously noted in Brown v.

Partin v. DALTON PROPERTY ASSOCIATES

112 N.C. App. 807 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 7, 1993

Brown v. Boger, 263 N.C. 248, 255 , 139 S.E.2d 577, 582 (1965). A tenant in common is entitled, as a matter of right, to an actual partition of the land. Kayann Properties, Inc. v. … Brown, 263 N.C. at 256 , 139 S.E.2d at 583 . N.C. Gen.

Daniel v. City of Morganton

125 N.C. App. 47 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 7, 1997

The Burke County Board of Education First, it has already been established that a plaintiff, while participating in team practice is an invitee as to a defendant school board. Clary v. … Beatty v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 99 N.C. App. 753, 755 , 394 S.E.2d 242, 244 (1990). Pursuant to N.C. Gen.

State v. Traub

197 N.C. App. 761 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 7, 2009

State v. Watkins, 337 N.C. 437, 441 , 446 S.E.2d 67, 70 (1994) (citing Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21-22 , 20 L. Ed. 2d 889, 906 (1968)). … See State v.

Stetser v. TAP Pharmaceutical Products Inc.

162 N.C. App. 518 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 3, 2004

TAP maintains its own headquarters, has its own bank account, files its own taxes, holds regular Board of Directors meetings, and hires and fires its own personnel. … Cherry Bekaert & Holland v. Brown, 99 N.C. App. 626, 629-30 , 394 S.E.2d 651, 654 (1990). In this case, the trial court made no findings of fact, and neither party made such a request.

McKee v. Crescent Spinning Co.

54 N.C. App. 558 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 17, 1981

In Taylor v. J. P. … McTesson made his “brown lung” diagnosis.

State v. Cobb

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 31, 2020

In Brown v. … After determining the primary purpose of the checking station is lawful, the trial court is required to follow the three-prong inquiry set out in Brown v. Texas 443 U.S. 47, 61 L.

State v. Davis

13 N.C. App. 492 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 2, 1972

and to Bessie Brown that he paid her $4.00 to have relations with her?” … State v. Murry, 277 N.C. 197 , 176 S.E. 2d 738 (1970) ; State v. McNeil, 277 N.C. 162 , 176 S.E. 2d 732 (1970) ; State v. Williams, 275 N.C. 77 , 165 S.E. 2d 481 (1969); State v.

Benton v. Hillcrest Foods, Inc.

136 N.C. App. 42 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 21, 1999

On the morning of 11 July 1993, at approximately 3:00 a.m., James Lee Popwell (“Popwell”) and Arthur Franklin Brown (“Brown”) (collectively “plaintiffs”) entered the Waffle House restaurant (“the restaurant”) located at 3309 … N.C.G.S. § 8C-1, Rule 403. *54 In Murrow v.

White v. Union County

93 N.C. App. 148 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 7, 1989

Russ v. Board of Education, 232 N.C. 128, 131 , 59 S.E. 2d 589, 592 (1950). The amendment should have been allowed. … . § 153A-345(e) the requirements for that hearing are set out in Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 299 N.C. 620 , 265 S.E. 2d 379 (1980). See Humble Oil and Refining Co. v.