Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncctapp

9,157 results

1.06s

  • State v. Jarrett

    203 N.C. App. 675 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 4, 2010

    In order to make this determination, this Court has required application of the three-prong test set out by the United States Supreme Court in Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 50 , 61 L. Ed. 2d 357, 361 , 99 S. … V.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • State v. Cole

    824 S.E.2d 921 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 19, 2019

    Brown died as a result of the shooting. … State v. Belk , 201 N.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Anderson v. N.C. State Bd. of Elections

    248 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 21, 2016

    Liner v. … Steffel v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • State v. Veazey

    201 N.C. App. 398 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 8, 2009

    Ed. 2d 333 (2000), and if the purpose is valid, must consider whether the checkpoint was reasonable under the balancing test articulated in Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 61 L. Ed. 2d 357 (1979). Veazey, 191 N.C. … Brown, 443 U.S. at 51 , 61 L. Ed. 2d at 362 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • State v. Alston

    61 N.C. App. 454 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 5, 1983

    State v. Fulcher, 294 N.C. 503 , 243 S.E. 2d 338 (1978). … Brown arrived at the home of defendant’s friend, there was sufficient evidence for the jury to find the restraint and asportation were for the purpose of raping Ms. Brown.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Adams

    90 N.C. App. 145 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 3, 1988

    Tried for the first degree murder of Rufus Edward Brown, Jr., defendant was convicted of voluntary manslaughter. … State v. Corn, 307 N.C. 79, 85 , 296 S.E. 2d 261, 266 (1982). No error. Chief Judge Hedrick and Judge Eagles concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Moore v. Rhodes

    190 N.C. App. 822 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 3, 2008

    METTIE MOORE, Plaintiff, v. JIMMIE RHODES AND ELIJAH BROWN Defendants. No. COA07-1394 North Carolina Court of Appeals Filed June 3, 2008 This case not for publication The Firm of Erma L. … See Bowlin v. Duke Univ., 108 N.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Liberato

    156 N.C. App. 182 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 18, 2003

    State v. Benson, 331 N.C. 537, 544 , 417 S.E.2d 756, 761 (1992). … State v. Riggsbee, 72 N.C. App. 167, 171 , 323 S.E.2d 502, 505 (1984) (citations omitted). See also State v. Noffsinger, 137 N.C. App. 418, 424 , 528 S.E.2d 605, 609 (2000).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Mullis v. Sechrest

    126 N.C. App. 91 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 6, 1997

    Therefore, under a strict construction of G.S. 115C-42, the Board has not waived immunity by purchasing a contract of insurance. See Hallman v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Education, 124 N.C. … Lyles v. City of Charlotte, 344 N.C. 676, 681 , 477 S.E.2d 150, 153 (1996). Local boards of education are not eligible to participate in risk pools. Id. at 680 , 477 S.E.2d at 153. III.

    Reversed on other grounds by Mullis v. Sechrest, 347 N.C. 548 (1998)Cited 8 timesPublished
  • S. J. Groves & Sons & Co. v. State

    50 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1980

    Graham and Son, Inc., v. Board of Education, 25 N.C. App. 163 , 212 S.E. 2d 542 , cert. den. 287 N.C. 465, 215 S.E. 2d 623 (1975). … See, Graham and Son, Inc. v. Board of Education, 25 N.C. App. 163 , 212 S.E. 2d 542 , cert. denied 287 N.C. 465 , 215 S.E. 2d 623 (1975).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • State v. Williams

    98 N.C. App. 68 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 3, 1990

    State v. Richardson, 36 N.C. App. 373, 376 , 242 S.E.2d 918 , 920 (1978). … See State v. Brown, 64 N.C. App. 578, 582 , 307 S.E.2d 831, 834 (1983).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Allan S. Meade & Associates, Inc. v. McGarry

    68 N.C. App. 467 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 15, 1984

    Durham v. Creech, 32 N.C. App. 55 , 231 S.E. 2d 163 (1977). As a general rule, of course, it is presumed that an instrument is correct as written and executed. Hice v. … We find the statements of this Court, in Construction Co. v. Anderson, 5 N.C.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Leary v. N.C. Forest Products, Inc.

    157 N.C. App. 396 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 6, 2003

    The dissent cites Inland Greens HOA, Inc. v. Dallas Harris Real Estate-Construction, Inc., 127 N.C. App. 610 , 492 S.E.2d 359 (1997) and Board of Comm’rs of Roxboro v. … But see Brown v. Miller, 63 N.C.

    Cited 156 timesPublished
  • In Re Jc

    205 N.C. App. 301 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 6, 2010

    Brown v. Flowe, 349 N.C. 520, 522 , 507 S.E.2d 894, 895 (1998) (quoting Shelton v. Morehead Mem'l Hosp., 318 N.C. 76, 81 , 347 S.E.2d 824, 828 (1986)). … (alteration in original) (quoting State v. Sturdivant, 304 N.C. 293, 311 , 283 S.E.2d 719, 731 (1981))).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Hall

    134 N.C. App. 417 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 3, 1999

    Darrold Brown (Brown), one of defendant’s roommates, testified for the State in exchange for a reduced sentence on a robbery charge. … See Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98, 116 , 53 L.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Garlock v. WAKE COUNTY BD. OF EDUC.

    712 S.E.2d 158 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 19, 2011

    Number two, Your Honor, we're asking for clear guidelines going forward, including for May 18th, which I would just note, is the day after the 56th anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Brown versus *166 Board of … App.1971); see also Edwards v. City Council of City of Seattle, 3 Wash.App. 665 , 479 P.2d 120 (1970). Id. The Arizona Supreme Court, in Karol v. Board of Educ.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Hinchman

    192 N.C. App. 657 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 16, 2008

    State v. Ward, 127 N.C. … In State v. Evans, 145 N.C.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Bailey

    97 N.C. App. 472 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 6, 1990

    As in this case, the defendant in Brown did not object at trial to the instruction . . . but the Court held that the *479 ‘plain error’ rule adopted in State v. … Likewise, Brown and Mitchell require that defendant in this case be awarded a new trial on the charge of first-degree kidnapping. Accord State v. McClain, 86 N.C. App. 219 , 356 S.E.2d 826 (1987).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Thompson v. Refrigerated Transport Co., Inc.

    32 N.C. App. 693 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 6, 1977

    v. … Brown v. Truck Lines, supra. Whether the injury for which he seeks compensation arose out of and in the course of his employment is to be determined as in any other case.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Zimmerman v. Appalachian State University

    149 N.C. App. 121 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 5, 2002

    Dept. of Correction v. McNeely, 135 N.C. App. 587, 592 , 521 S.E.2d 730, 733 (1999) (quoting Thompson v. … Carpenter v. Brooks, 139 N.C.

    Cited 10 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.