Case law

Carolina Medicorp, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of North Carolina Teachers' & State Employees' Comprehensive Major Medical Plan

118 N.C. App. 485 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 18, 1995

Petitioners rely on States’ Rights Democratic Party v. … Redevelopment Com’n of Greenville v. *493 Hannaford, 29 N.C. App. 1, 4 , 222 S.E.2d 752, 754 (1976). See Brooks v.

State v. Woods

146 N.C. App. 686 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 6, 2001

City of Raleigh Board of Adjustment, 140 N.C. App. 784 , 538 S.E.2d 621 (2000) (quoting Kirkpatrick v. Village Council, 138 N.C. App. 79, 86 , 530 S.E.2d 338, 343 (2000)). … Further, in United States v. Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Board of Education, 902 F.2d 267 (M.D.N.C. 1990), the U.S.

State v. Patterson

209 N.C. App. 708 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 1, 2011

Brown, who helped stabilize Defendant with a cervical collar and a spine board, testified that he detected a heavy odor of alcohol coming from Defendant and heard Defendant repeatedly state, “I wasn’t driving.” … Likewise, in State v. Oldham, 10 N.C.

Cabarrus Cty. Bd. of Educ. v. Dep't of State Treasurer

261 N.C. App. 325 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 18, 2018

Wilson; and North Carolina School Boards Association, by Legal Counsel Allison Brown Schafer, for North Carolina School Boards Association, amicus curiae. … V.

Barefoot v. Durham Cnty.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 18, 2026

See Brown v. City of Winston- Salem, 171 N.C. App. 266, 270, 614 S.E.2d 599, 602 (2005). … The County contends the Board’s prior application of the UDO “is entitled to great consideration[,]” citing MacPherson v. Asheville, 283 N.C. 299, 307, 196 S.E.2d 200, 206 (1973).

Barefoot v. Durham Cnty.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 20, 2025

See Brown v. City of Winston- Salem, 171 N.C. App. 266, 270, 614 S.E.2d 599, 602 (2005). … The County contends the Board’s prior application of the UDO “is entitled to great consideration[,]” citing MacPherson v. Asheville, 283 N.C. 299, 307, 196 S.E.2d 200, 206 (1973).

Karner v. Roy White Flowers, Inc.

134 N.C. App. 645 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 7, 1999

At some point before the summer of 1990, Brown opened a small consignment shop named “The Girl Can’t Help It” on the first floor of the house. Plaintiffs contend Brown also used the structure for a residence. … Brown’s business on lot two (2). Plaintiffs presented testimony by Lyman G.

State v. Packingham

229 N.C. App. 293 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 20, 2013

Most recently, in Doe v. … Brown v. Entm’t Merchs. Ass’n, 2011 U.S. 4802 , 37-38, 180 L. Ed. 2d 708, 725 (2011) (quotations and citations omitted).

State v. Freeman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 6, 2024

Brown left the school to visit Brandon’s residence. Ms. Brown arrived at the home and spoke with Ms. Pike and Defendant. … Brown.

Cabarrus Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Bd. of Trs., Teachers' & State Employees' Ret. Sys.

818 S.E.2d 201 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 18, 2018

Wilkes Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Bd. of Trs., Teachers' & State Employees' Ret. Sys.

818 S.E.2d 202 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 18, 2018

Roberts v. Mars Hill Univ.

802 S.E.2d 621 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 5, 2017

Loughlin v. North Carolina State Board of Registration for Professional Engineers & Land Surveyors

32 N.C. App. 351 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 16, 1977

D & W, Inc. v. Charlotte, 268 N.C. 577, 583 , 151 S.E. 2d 241, 245 (1966). … Fox v. Commissioners of Durham, 244 N.C. 497, 500 , 94 S.E. 2d 482, 485 (1956). See 42 Am. Jur. 2nd, Injunctions, § 187.

State v. Diaz

78 N.C. App. 488 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 17, 1985

State v. Brown, 308 N.C. 181 , 301 S.E. 2d 89 (1983). … State v. LeDuc, 306 N.C. 62, 78 , 291 S.E. 2d 607, 617 (1982).

Overton v. Camden County

155 N.C. App. 100 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 31, 2002

See Chambers v. Board of Adjustment, 250 N.C. 194 , 197, 108 S.E.2d 211 , 213 (1959) (noting that Boards of Adjustment cannot waive requirements under a zoning ordinance); Bernstein v. … See also Davidson County v.

Carroll v. Parker

2 N.C. App. 573 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 16, 1968

In support of their position, plaintiffs rely on Harrison v. Bray, 92 N.C. 488 , and Brown v. Daniel, 219 N.C. 349 , 13 S.E. 2d 623 . In the Harrison case, plaintiff brought an action to compel an accounting. … The amount of the credit, if any, is in controversy, and we cannot say on this record, as in Dennis v.

Deminski v. The State Bd. Of Educ.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 7, 2020

Wilson, and the North Carolina School Boards Association, by Allison Brown Schafer, for Amicus Curiae North Carolina School Boards Association. STROUD, Judge. … As our Supreme Court explained in Hoke County Board of Education v.

State Ex Rel. Jacobs v. Sherard

36 N.C. App. 60 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 18, 1978

This is an act denounced by G.S. 19-1, and a public nuisance, State v. Brown, 221 N.C. 301 , 20 S.E. 2d 286 (1942); it is also a violation of the criminal law. G.S. 18A-25. … Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 , 96 S.Ct. 984 , 47 L.Ed. 2d 128 (1976); McCray v. *65 Maryland, 456 F. 2d 1 (4th Cir. 1972); Mazzucco v. Board of Medical Examiners, 31 N.C.

State v. Shine

121 N.C. App. 78 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1995

Stat. § 8C, Rule 403 (1992); see also State v. … See State v.

Bennett v. Eastern Rebuilders, Inc.

52 N.C. App. 579 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 16, 1981

Still v. Lance, 279 N.C. 254 , 182 S.E. 2d 403 (1971); 5 N.C. Index 2d, Master and Servant, § 10, p. 327.” Tatum v. Brown, 29 N.C. App. 504, 505 , 224 S.E. 2d 698, 698-99 (1976) (emphasis added). … Gause v. Perkins, 56 N.C. 177 (1857).” Frink v. Board of Transportation, 27 N.C. App. 207, 209 , 218 S.E. 2d 713, 714 (1975).