Case law

Julian Baptist Church, Inc. v. Brown

310 N.C. 745 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 30, 1984

Petition by Church and Brown for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 Denied 30 April 1984.

Brown v. J. P. Stevens & Co.

304 N.C. 192 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1981

Ruffin v. Board of Commissioners

69 N.C. 498 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1873

It seems to be settled by numerous cases in the United States Supreme Court, cited in plaintiff’s brief beginning with McCullock v. … It seems that all that is to be inferred from the decision in Veazie Bank v. Fenno, supra, is not that National Bank bills are exempt, but that Congress has the power to exempt them from State taxation. See Lilly v.

Doe Ex Dem. Rhodes v. Brown

13 N.C. 195 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1829

Whatever title William Brown had to the land in dispute has been transferred to the lessors of the Plaintiff, and on that title he rests his right to recover in the present action. … If William Brown, had conveyed the legal title in the land To the Defendant in 1821, and they had both remained in possession so langas to make an uninterrupted possession of seven years from the time William Brown first

Gregory v. WA BROWN & PMA INS.

667 S.E.2d 468 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 24, 2008

667 S.E.2d 468 (2008) GREGORY v. W.A. BROWN & PMA Ins. No. 447A08. Supreme Court of North Carolina. September 24, 2008. William D. Acton, Jr., Charlotte, for Gregory. Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 664 S.E.2d 589 .

Casey v. . Board of Education

219 N.C. 739 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 31, 1941

Code of 1939 [Micbie], 8081 [ppp]); Early v. Basnight & Co., 214 N. C., 103 , 198 S. E., 577 ; Saunders v. Allen, 208 N. C., 189 , 179 S. E., 754 ; Buchanan v. Highway Commission, 217 N. C., 173 , 7 S. E. (2d), 382 . … Early v. Basnight & Co., supra.

Tidewater Bank & Trust Co. v. Brown

190 N.C. 848 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 16, 1925

Governor Ex Rel. Brown v. Franklin

7 N.C. 213 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 5, 1819

Wilcocks v. Huggins, 2 Strange 907.

Board of Commissioners v. Blackburn

68 N.C. 406 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1873

By the Constitution these Courts were abolished; their judicial powers were given to the Superior Courts, and the administration of the municipal affairs of the counties to the boards of county commissioners. … Foster v. Woodfin, 65 N. C., 29 . Stanly v. Massengill, 63 N. C. 558 . Mason v. Miles, Id. 564 . It must be implied that no other body has that right.

Wilson v. Board of Commissioners

193 N.C. 386 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 16, 1927

Tidewater Bank & Trust Co. v. Brown

190 N.C. 847 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 16, 1925

Brown v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company

276 N.C. 398 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 11, 1970

Cox v. Gallamore, 267 N.C. 537 , 148 S.E. 2d 616 ; Jarrett v. R. R., 254 N.C. 493 , 119 S.E. 2d 383 ; High v. R. R., 248 N.C. 414 ; 103 S.E. 2d 498 ; Summerlin v. R. R., 238 N.C. 438 , 78 S.E. 2d 162 ; 6 Strong, N. C. … In support of this proposition, defendant relies, inter alia, upon Jones v. R. R., 235 N.C. 640 , 70 S.E. 2d 669 ; Hinnant v. R. R., 202 N.C. 489 , 163 S.E. 555 , and—most heavily—upon Jeff ries v. Powell and Branch v.

Barbee v. Board of Commissioners

210 N.C. 717 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 25, 1936

E., 749 ; McDowell v. Const. Co., 96 N. C., 514 , 2 S. E., 351 ; Smith v. Wilmington, 98 N. C., 343 , 4 S. E., 489 ; Wood v. Oxford, 97 N. C., 227 , 2 S. E., 653 ; Smallwood v. New Bern, 90 N. C., 36 ; Perry v. … Bank v. Gahagan, ante, 464; Sutton v. Ins. Co., 209 N. C., 826 , 184 S. E., 821 ; Oliver v. Hood, Comr., ibid, 291, 183 S. E., 657 ; Distributing Corp. v. Maxwell, ibid., 47, 182 S. E., 724 ; Phifer v. Berry, 202 N.

Brown v. A. C. L. R. R.

137 N.C. 703 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1904

Mack v. Board of Education

367 N.C. 255 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 7, 2013

Beauforth County Board of Education v. Beaufort County Board of Commissioners

661 S.E.2d 239 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 2008

discretionary review is allowed with respect to the following issues: In light of Article IX, Section 2 of the North Carolina Constitution, is the statutory framework for resolving school funding disputes between the county board … of education and the county board of commissioners constitutional?

Beaufort County Board of Education v. Beaufort County Board of Commissioners

362 N.C. 348 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 2008

discretionary review is allowed with respect to the following issues: In light of Article IX, Section 2 of the North Carolina Constitution, is the statutory framework for resolving school funding disputes between the county board … of education and the county board of commissioners constitutional?

Hannah v. Board of Commissioners

176 N.C. 395 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 6, 1918

The plaintiff seeks to recover the sum of $20 of the Board of Commissioners of Stokes County for the burial of George S. Kogers, who-was a Confederate veteran and on the pension rolls of that county. … «ball be tbe duty of tbe board of commissioners of such county, upon tbe certificate of said fact by tbe clerk of tbe Superior Court and recommendation of tbe chairman of tbe pension board of said county, to order tbe payment

Hill v. Board of Commissioners

209 N.C. 4 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 11, 1935

Under the authorities cited in Newman et al. v. … Watkins et al., Board of County Commissioners, and Royster et al., Board of Elections of Vance County , 208 N.C. 675 , the plaintiffs cannot maintain this action for injunctive relief, since they nowhere allege that they

Board of Commissioners v. Murphy

107 N.C. 36 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1890

Gatling v. Commissioners, 92 N. C., 536 ; Wade v. Commissioners, 74 N. C., 81 ; Huggins v. Hinson, Phil., 126.