Case law

Gill v. Board of Commissioners

160 N.C. 176 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 7, 1912

By the statute, the boards were not authorized to act at all until a properly signed petition had been filed. R. R. v. … A., Ill, in wbicb it is also beld tbat “citizens,” witb reference to tbe right of suffrage, means male persons: Brown v. U. S., 113 U. S., 568 ; Sedgewick on Stat. and Const. Law, 225.

Moran v. Board of Commissioners

168 N.C. 289 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1915

Rigsbee v. Durham, 98 N. C., 81 ; Goldsboro Graded School v. Broadhurst, 109 N. C., 232 ; Rodman, v. Washington, 122 N. C., 39 ; Bear v. Comrs., 124 N. C., 204 ; Hollowell v. Borden, 148 N. C., 255 ; Ellis v. … This case is not like Winston v. Trust Co., 158 N. C., 512 , as is explained in Briggs-v. Raleigh, 166 N. C., 150 . Nor is it like McCrackin v. R.

Board of Commissioners v. Pruden

178 N.C. 394 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 29, 1919

As said in Brown v. … The Brown case has been approved in Mills v. Comrs., supra; Parvin v. Comrs., 177 N. C., 508 , and at the present term, in Martin County v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., and Burry County v. same defendant.

Wike v. Board of Trustees

229 N.C. 370 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 20, 1948

Godwin v. Bank, 145 N. C., 320 , 328; Trust Co. v. Construction Co., 191 N. C., 664 , 132 S. E., 804 ; Bank v. Jackson, 214 N. C., 582 , 200 S. E., 444 ; 4 A. J., 239, 240. … Petty v. Insurance Co., 210 N. C., 500 , 187 S. E., 816 ; Oldham v. Ross, 214 N. C., 696 , 200 S. E., 393 ; Adams v. Cleve, 218 N. C., 302 , 10 S. E. (2d), 911 ; Lockhart v. Lockhart, 223 N. C., 123 , 25 S.

Lutterloh v. Board of Commissioners

65 N.C. 403 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1871

to compel them to levy a tax for the satisfaction of said judgment* Gooch v. … State v. Jones, 1 Ire. 129. It is not embraced in the rule established in Tate v. Powe, 64 N. C. 644 , which defines the distinction between civil actions and special proceedings.

Snow v. Board of Commissioners

112 N.C. 335 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 15, 1893

By the terms of the contract between the plaintiffs Ellington, Royster & Co. and the defendant Board of Commissioners the latter were bound to pay to said plaintiffs the price agreed upon for the building of the court-house

Britt v. . Board of Canvassers

172 N.C. 797 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 22, 1916

Brown v. Turner , 70 N.C. 103 . This last statement by Judge Bynum and concurred in by Pearson, C. … Cited: In re Fain , 172 N.C. 794 (5c); Brown v. Costen , 176 N.C. 66 (9c); S. v. Pharr , 179 N.C. 699 (1p); Rowland v. Board of *Page 864 Elections , 184 N.C. 85 (8j); Bell v.

Posey v. . Board of Education

199 N.C. 306 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 20, 1930

Power is conferred upon said board in order that it may perform its duty, under the law, both to the State and to the city of Asheville. In Newton v. Highway Commission, 192 N. C., 54 , 133 S. … In Cameron v. Highway Commission, 188 N. C., 84 , 123 S.

Wilson v. Board of Commissioners

193 N.C. 386 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 16, 1927

Brown v. North Carolina Department of Correction

364 N.C. 319 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 27, 2010

For the reasons stated in Jones v. Keller, — N.C.—, —, S.E.2d —(2010) (518PA09), we reverse the trial court’s 14 December 2009 order allowing petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. REVERSED.

Brown v. Don Plotkins Home Center

347 N.C. 395 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 4, 1997

Nationsbank of North Carolina v. Brown

340 N.C. 568 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 21, 1995

Jones Ex Rel. Brown v. Gilreath

28 N.C. 338 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1846

Jones v. Blackledge, 2 No. Car. Law Rep. 457. For that reason, Brown’s note was not a set-off in this action. … But, if Brown had been the endorsee of this bond, and as such the plaintiff in this action, his promissary note to Gilreath, one of the defendants, would not be a set-off. State Bank v. Armstrong, 4 Dev. 519 .

Queen v. Board of Commissioners

193 N.C. 821 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 25, 1927

The court was originally established by the board of commissioners of Haywood County, on 3 December, 1924, under a general act, Laws *824 1919, ch. 277. … Roebuck v. Trustees, 184 N. C., 144 ; Coble v. Comrs., 184 N. C., 342 ; S. v. Kelly, 186 N. C., 365 ; Reed v. Engineering Co., 188 N. C., 39 ; Provision Co. v. Daves, 190 N. C., 7 ; Ellis v. Greene, 191 N.

Board of Commissioners v. Malone

179 N.C. 110 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1919

of education, Gill v. … C., 176 ; Key v. Board of Education, 170 N. C., 123 , but, on the facts of this record, the reference in the petition to equipment as one of the purposes does not come within the principle of these cases.

Barbee v. Board of Commissioners

210 N.C. 717 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 25, 1936

E., 749 ; McDowell v. Const. Co., 96 N. C., 514 , 2 S. E., 351 ; Smith v. Wilmington, 98 N. C., 343 , 4 S. E., 489 ; Wood v. Oxford, 97 N. C., 227 , 2 S. E., 653 ; Smallwood v. New Bern, 90 N. C., 36 ; Perry v. … Bank v. Gahagan, ante, 464; Sutton v. Ins. Co., 209 N. C., 826 , 184 S. E., 821 ; Oliver v. Hood, Comr., ibid, 291, 183 S. E., 657 ; Distributing Corp. v. Maxwell, ibid., 47, 182 S. E., 724 ; Phifer v. Berry, 202 N.

Mack v. Board of Education

367 N.C. 255 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 7, 2013

Board of Commissioners v. Murphy

107 N.C. 36 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1890

Gatling v. Commissioners, 92 N. C., 536 ; Wade v. Commissioners, 74 N. C., 81 ; Huggins v. Hinson, Phil., 126.

Brown v. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co.

323 N.C. 363 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1988

Board of Education v. . Deitrick

221 N.C. 38 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 25, 1942

Hoover v. Indemnity Co., 202 N. C., 655 , 163 S. E., 758 ; Brown v. R. R. Co., 202 N. C., 256 , 162 S. E., 613 ; Bost v. Metcalfe, 219 N. C., 607 , 14 S. E., (2d), 648. Affirmed.