Case law

Lee v. . Board of Adjustment

226 N.C. 107 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 27, 1946

In re Parker, supra; Prusik v. Board of Appeal, 160 N. E., 312 (Mass.) ; Thayer v. Board of Appeals, 157 Atl., 273 (Mass.); Norcross v. Board of Appeal, 255 Mass., 157 , 150 N. E., 887 ; People v. Walsh, 227 N. Y. … South Ozone Park Lumber & Supply Corp. v. Board of Appeals, 241 N. Y. S., 810; People v. Miller, 176 N. Y. S., 206; Heffernan v. Zoning Board of Review, 144 Atl., 674 (R. I.); S. v. Kansas City, 27 S.

Board of Education v. Makely

139 N.C. 31 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 12, 1905

C., 12 ; Bruner v. Threadgill, 88 N. C., 365 , and Waters v. Roberts, 89 N. … Holloran v. Meisel, 87 Va., 398 ; Clay v. White, 1 Munf., 162 ; Wool v. Saunders, 108 N. C., 729 .

Pullen v. Board of Commissioners

68 N.C. 451 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 15, 1873

Abernethy v. Board of Commissioners

169 N.C. 631 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 13, 1915

Tbe foregoing principles were substantially stated and applied by us in Fortune v. Commissioners, 140 N. C., 322 . … Citing S. v. Boon, 1 N. C., 103 ; Drake v. Drake, 15 N. C., 110 ; Adams v. Turrentine, 30 N. C., 141 ; S. v. Melton, 44 N. C., 49 ; Blue v. McDuffie, ibid., 131; Potter’s Dwarris on Statutes, 179 et seq.

Fremont City Board of Education v. Wayne County Board of Education

259 N.C. 280 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 17, 1963

Lockman v. Lockman, 220 N.C. 95 , 16 S.E. 2d 670 . Relief will be granted as warranted by the allegations and proof. McCampbell v. Building & Loan Assoc., 231 N.C. 647 , 58 S.E. 2d 617 ; Dry v. … Harris v. Board of Education, 216 N.C. 147 , 4 S.E. 2d 328 . Reversed.

Lowe v. Board of Commissioners

70 N.C. 532 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1874

James v. Lemley, 2 Ired. Eq. 278 ; Miller v. Washburne, 3 Ired. Eq. 161 .

Johnston v. Board of Commissioners

67 N.C. 101 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1872

When the defendants, “ the Board of Commissioners,” succeeded to the -office and duties of the Justices of the Peace in this regard, .and found a very large amount of interest in arrear, was it the duty ot the Board ot Commissioners … The propriety of this, in a general point -oí -v-iow, will occur to every one.

Robeson, Adm'r, C. v. . Brown and Another

63 N.C. 554 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1869

The Convention and Legislature have seen proper to change this rule of evidence in regard to certain classes of contracts, and in so doing they did not come in conflict with the Constitution of the United States, Woodfin v.

Colvard v. Board of Commissioners

95 N.C. 515 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 15, 1886

, declares, that “no person shall be eligible to the office of sheriff, who theretofore lias been sheriff and hath failed to settle with and fully pay up to every officer the taxes which were due from him, nor shall any Board … permit such former sheriff to give bond for or enter upon the duties of the office, until he has produced before the board the receipt, in full of every officer for such taxes.”

State Board of Public Welfare v. Board of Commissioners

262 N.C. 475 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 23, 1964

The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, sec. 1; S. v. McAlhaney, 220 N.C. 387 , 17 S.E. 2d 352 ; S. v. Wolf, 145 N.C. 440 , 59 S.E. 40 ; Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians v. U. … Martin v. Comrs. of Wake, 208 N.C. 354 , 180 S.E. 777 ; Railroad v. Beaufort County, 224 N.C. 115 , 29 S.E. 2d 201 ; R. R. v. Duplin County, 226 N.C. 719 , 40 S.E. 2d 371 .

Mills v. Board of Commissioners

175 N.C. 215 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1918

Brown v. Comrs., 173 N. C., 598 . … "We are clearly of opinion that this well-considered case of Brown v. Comrs. is fully supported by the authorities cited and is decisive of the questions presented on this record.

Mauney v. Board of Commissioners

71 N.C. 486 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1874

Bear v. Cohen, 65 N. C. Rep., 511 . Therefore the exception to the mere fact that his Honor modified the restraining order of Judge Tourgee cannot be maintained.

McPhail v. Board of Commissioners

119 N.C. 330 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1896

and repairing of the same, with the concurrence of the Board of County Commissioners. … The question raised as to the legality of the term of the court at which the action was tried is settled- by the decision'in McNeill v. McDuffie at this Term. Error.

Massey v. . Board of Education

204 N.C. 193 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 8, 1933

Kenan v. Motor Co., 203 N. C., at p. 110; Johnson v. Bagging Co., 203 N. C., 579 ; Richey v. Cotton Mills, 203 N. C., 595 . … The “come and go” rule, as laid down in Hunt v. State, 201 N. C., 707 , is not applicable under the facts in this case. Edwards v. Loving Co., 203 N. C., 189 ; Bray v. Weatherly and Co., 203 N. C., 160 . See Winberry v.

Vaughn v. Board of Commissioners

117 N.C. 429 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1895

Broadnax v. Commissioners, 64 N. C., 244 ; Satterthwaite v. Commissioners, 76 N. C., 153 . “For the exercise of powers conferred by the Constitution,” said PeabsoN, C. … The legislature of 1895 restored to the boards of county commissioners the same -discretionary power exercised by them before the passage of the Act of 1876-N7, Ch.

Rigsbee v. Board of Commissioners

99 N.C. 341 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1888

Southerland v. Goldsboro, 96 N. C., 49 ; Duke v. Brown, Ibid., 127; McDowell v. The Construction Company, Ibid., 514; Smith v. Wilmington, 98 N. C., 343 . … Duke v. Brown, supra. How such scrutiny of the registration books shall be made is not prescribed by any statute. In the absence of any prescribed method it must be summary — in some way intelligible.

Board of Education v. . Forrest

190 N.C. 753 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1925

II, sec. 5416), that tbe county board of education or tbe board of trustees of any incorporated or chartered school district might acquire sites for school buildings by donation or purchase, and not more than two acres by … McInnish v. Bd. Ed., 187 N. C., 494; School Committee, v. Board of Education, 186 N. C., 643 ; Davenport v. Board of Education, 183 N. C., 570 ; Pemberton v. Board of Education, 172 N. C., 552 ; Venable v.

Brown v. City of Winston-Salem

360 N.C. 575 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 17, 2006

Brown v. City of Winston-Salem

360 N.C. 575 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 17, 2006

Parsons v. . Board of Education

200 N.C. 88 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 19, 1930

Gooch v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 196 N. C., 823 , 146 S. E., 803 , and cases cited. Affirmed.