Case law

BROWN BROS. HARRIMAN TRUST v. Benson

364 N.C. 600 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 4, 2010

703 S.E.2d 157 (2010) BROWN BROS. HARRIMAN TRUST v. BENSON. No. 186P09-3. Supreme Court of North Carolina. November 4, 2010. William R. Culp, Jr., Charlotte, for John H. Benson. Paul A. … Kohut, Charlotte, for Brown Brothers Harriman Trust. *158 Edward G. Connette, III, Charlotte, for Ruth Pringle Pipkin Franklin. James E. Creamer, Jr., Winston-Salem, for Unborn Heirs. Lynn F. Chandler, for Anne P.

Stockwell Ex Rel. Stockwell v. Brown

254 N.C. 662 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 10, 1961

What is said in Blalock v. … Boyd v. R. R., 200 N.C. 324 , 156 S.E. 507 ; Butner v. Spease, 217 N.C. 82 , 6 SE. 2d 808. The Court said in Riggs v.

City of High Point v. Brown

206 N.C. 664 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 20, 1934

The assessment was not void as in Charlotte v. Brown, 165 N. C., 435 , and like cases. This appealing defendant has no legal status to attack this assessment, it is res judicata. … C., 531 ; Waddill v. Masten, 172 N. C., 582 ; Gallimore v. Thomasville, 191 N. C., 648 . "We think the contention correct. In Martin v. Vanlaningham, 189 N.

Brown v. NC Dept. of Correction

700 S.E.2d 746 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 26, 2010

700 S.E.2d 746 (2010) BROWN v. N.C. DEPT. OF CORRECTION, et al. No. 517PA09. Supreme Court of North Carolina. August 26, 2010. Tiare B. Smiley, Special Deputy Attorney General, for Alvin Keller, et al. … Brown. David C. Pishko, Winston-Salem, Margaret S. Abrams, Raleigh, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

Brown v. NC Dept. of Correction

702 S.E.2d 218 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 30, 2010

702 S.E.2d 218 (2010) BROWN v. N.C. DEPT. OF CORRECTION, et al. No. 517PA09. Supreme Court of North Carolina. September 30, 2010. Tiare B. Smiley, Special Deputy Attorney General, for Alvin Keller, et al. … Brown. David C. Pishko, Winston-Salem, Margaret S. Abrams, Raleigh, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

Brown v. NC Dept. of Correction

690 S.E.2d 277 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 11, 2010

690 S.E.2d 277 (2010) BROWN v. N.C. DEPT. OF CORRECTION, et al. No. 517PA09. Supreme Court of North Carolina. January 11, 2010. Tiare B. Smiley, Special Deputy Attorney General, for Alvin Keller, et al. … Brown.

Brown v. NC Dept. of Correction

363 N.C. 800 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 18, 2009

689 S.E.2d 875 (2009) BROWN v. N.C. DEPT. OF CORRECTION, et al. No. 517P09. Supreme Court of North Carolina. December 18, 2009. Tiare B. Smiley, Special Deputy Attorney General, for Alvin Keller, et al. … Brown, The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th of December 2009 by Appellant for Temporary Stay: "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 18th of December 2009."

Brown v. NC Dept. of Correction

693 S.E.2d 354 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 2, 2010

693 S.E.2d 354 (2010) BROWN v. N.C. DEPT. OF CORRECTION, et al. No. 517PA09. Supreme Court of North Carolina. February 2, 2010. Tiare B. Smiley, Special Deputy Attorney General, for Alvin Keller, et al. … Brown. David C. Pishko, Winston-Salem, Margaret S. Abrams, Raleigh, for N.C. Advocates for Justice. The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st of February 2010 by N.C.

Brown v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

161 N.C. 573 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 26, 1913

Deppe v. R. R., 152 N. C., 79 ; Cotton v. R. R., 149 N. C., 229 . … C., 323 ; Berry v. R. R., 155 N. C., 287 , and Hutchinson v. R. R., 140 N.

Brown v. E. H. Clement Co.

203 N.C. 508 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 16, 1932

Tbis appeal must be dismissed on the authority of Johnson v. Mills, 196 N. C., 93 , 144 S. E., 534 .

Estate of Long v. Fowler

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 13, 2021

Brown-Graham & Jeffrey S. Koeze, Immunity from Personal -10-  ESTATE OF LONG V. … that defendant . . . is an agent of defendant Board”).

Board of School Commissioners v. County Board of Education

169 N.C. 196 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 19, 1915

This latter act prescribes: “It shall be the duty of the county board of education to distribute and apportion the school fund so as to give to each school in the county for each race the same length of school term, as nearly … That in apportioning the school fund' of the county of Mecklenburg the county board of education shall be governed in all respects by the provisions of section 207 of chapter 342 of the Private Laws of 1907.”

Little v. Board of Adjustment

195 N.C. 793 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 23, 1928

The case of Harden v. Raleigh, 192 N. C., 395 , determined two questions. 1. … The petitioners appeared before the board, in the case at bar, and filed a plea of res judicata contending that the case of Harden v. Raleigh, supra, bad determined the rights of the parties upon the same facts.

Harris v. . Board of Education

216 N.C. 147 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1939

Wilkinson v. Board of Education, 199 N. C., 669 , 155 S. E., 562 . The writ issues only when there is no other legal remedy. Hayes v. Benton, supra; Cody v. Barrett, supra; Mears v. Board of Education, supra; Powers v. … Lane v. Insurance Co., 142 N. C., 55 ; Key v. Board of Education, supra.

Gilmore v. . Board of Education

222 N.C. 358 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1942

Brown last saw him, before he went to Duke, he was not complaining of his bladder trouble, and Dr. O'Briant did not treat him for it in his last illness. The cases of Williams v. … Thompson , 200 N.C. 463 , 157 S.E. 430 ; Clark v. Cotton Woolen Mills , 204 N.C. 529 , 168 S.E. 816 ; and Doggett v.

Gilliland v. Board of Education.

141 N.C. 482 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 22, 1906

. *485 1954; Bryan v. Walton, 20 Ga., 480 ; Vaughan v. Phebe, 7 Term., 384; Nave v. Williams, 22 Ind., 368 . And it is not alone by oral expression that this reputation is evidenced and established. … We have held in State v. Exum, 138 N.

Gregory v. W.A. Brown & Pma Ins.

362 N.C. 509 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 24, 2008

Brown v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

169 N.C. 509 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 22, 1915

This might have been a valid objection under the old forms of pleading, although it is said to be “common learning that allegations of time and place are not in general material or traversable” (Pegram v. Stoltz, 67 N.

Craig v. Board of Education

667 S.E.2d 724 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 1, 2008

Brown v. Asheville Power & Light Co.

171 N.C. 555 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 24, 1916

It was the duty of the conductor to be at his .station at the platform where the passengers were in the habit of boarding the cars and to give necessary assistance. Clark v. Traction Co., 138 N. C., 77 . … In Arrowood v. R. R., 126 N.