Case law

Brown v. Merchant's & Farmers Nat. Bank

79 N.C. 244 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1878

In Morris v. Olivine, 22 Penn. … To the same effect is Thompson v. Spittle, 102, Mass. 211.

Brown v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company

285 N.C. 313 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 15, 1974

Williams v. … Bank v. Evans, 191 N.C. 535, 538 , 132 S.E. 563, 564 (1926). See Lithographic Co. v. Mills, 222 N.C. 516 , 23 S.E. 2d 913 (1943) ; Poultry Co. v. Oil Co., 272 N.C. 16 , 157 S.E. 2d 693 (1967).

Brown Ex Rel. Webb v. Wood

201 N.C. 309 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 16, 1931

Reich v. Cone, 180 N. C., 267 , 104 S. E., 530 ; Tyson v. Frutchey, 194 N. C., 750 , 140 S. E., 718 ; Jeffrey v. Mfg. Co., 197 N. C., 724 , 150 S. E., 503 . … The text is supported by the following authorities: Jasmin v. Meaney, 146 N. E., 257 ; Dennison v. Swerdlove, 146 N. E., 27 ; Bernasconi v. Bassi, 158 N. E., 341 ; Epperson v. Rastatter, 168 N. E., 126 .

Brown v. E. H. Clement Co.

217 N.C. 47 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 2, 1940

Jones v. Wooten, 137 N. C., 421 ; Garland v. Arrowood, 172 N. C., 591 , 90 S. E., 766 ; Graves v. Pritchett, 207 N. C., 518 , 177 S. E., 641 ; Ward v. Sewell, 214 N. C., 279 , 199 S. E., 28 . … Jenkins v. Parker, supra ( 192 N. C., 188 ); Baker v. Edwards, 176 N. C., 229 , 97 S. E., 16 ; Robinson v. Johnson, 174 N. C., 232 , 93 S. E., 743 . “4.

Brown v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

147 N.C. 217 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 25, 1908

Sprague v. Bond, 113 N. C., 551 . … Hill v. Hilliard, supra, was approved in Cecil v. Henderson, 121 N. C., 247. Faircloth, C. J., who wrote that opinion, in the later case of Raby v. Stuman, 127 N.

State ex rel. Brown v. Mitchell

102 N.C. 347 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 15, 1889

George v. High, 85 N. C, 99; Dula v. Young, 70 N. C., 450 . … Knott v. Taylor, 96 N. C., 553 ; Gilchrist v. Kitchin,. 86 N. C., 20 ; March v. Verble, 79 N. C., 19 .

Brown v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.

326 N.C. 387 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 5, 1990

The Browns then obtained counsel and appealed. The Court of Appeals found no error. Hinson v. Brown, 80 N.C. … Brown v. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co., 90 N.C. App. at 475-76, 369 S.E.2d at 374.

Brown v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.

165 N.C. 421 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 29, 1914

See cases Harper v. Lenoir, 152 N. C., 723 ; Geer v. Durham Water Co., 127 N. C., 349 ; Parker v. R. R., 119 N. C., 677 ; Bidley v. R. R., 118 N. … R. v. Resin, 99 Va., 18 ; Winona Zinc Co. v. Durham, 56 In. App., 351; Scott v. Nevada, 56 Mo. App., 189 . There-is no error in entering judgment for permanent damages, and the same is.affirmed. No error.

State Ex Rel. Brown v. Pike

74 N.C. 531 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1876

Armistead v. Hammond, 4 Hawks, 339 ; McKeller v. Bowell, 4 Hawks, 34 ; 7 Jones, 242 ; Bond v. Billups, 8 Jones, 423 ; 4 Hawks, 43 . The act of 1844, Bat.

State Ex Rel. Jones v. Brown

67 N.C. 475 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1872

State v. … State v. Miller, 11 Ire. 235, was an action on a Clerk’s bond.

State Ex Rel. Jones v. Brown

68 N.C. 554 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1873

There came into the hands of the principal of the defendant as guardian of Lucy Brown such sum as added to the interest up to 1st September, 1871, (see report of referee,) make $33,871.83. … See Harrison v. Ward, 3 Dev. R. 417, and Clancy v. Carrington, 3 Dev. R. 529.

Brown v. Weaver-Rogers Assoc.

350 N.C. 92 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1999

Brown v. Renaissance Media, Inc.

350 N.C. 91 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 4, 1999

Brown, Jr: acted within the scope of his authority when he executed the two notes. By order of the Court in Conference, this 4th day of February, 1999.

Brown v. Carolina Central Railway Co.

83 N.C. 128 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1880

In Raleigh & Augusta Air-Line v. Wicker, 74 N. … High on Receivers, §§ 1, 2 ; Skinner v. Maxwell, 68 N. C., 400 .

Board of Education v. Board of Commissioners of Johnston County

183 N.C. 300 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 12, 1922

Anderson v. Wilkins, supra, and cases there cited. Belo v. Comrs., 76 N. C., 497 ; 12 C. J., 1094; 6 R. C. L., 321. Speaking to a similar question in Thompson v. … See, also, Erskine v. Netson County (N. Dak.), 27 L. R. A., 696, and note. Again, in Grenada County Supervisors v. Brown, 112 U.

Brown v. . Comrs. of Richmond County

223 N.C. 744 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1943

Mial v. Ellington, 134 N. C., 131 , 46 S. E., 961 ; S. v. Jennette, 190 N. C., 96 , 129 S. E., 184 ; Queen v. Comrs. of Haywood, 193 N. C., 821 , 138 S. E., 310 ; 12 Am. Jur., 53 , sec. 420. … See also Hill v. Slansbury, ante, 193.

Brown v. Nationwide Mutual Ins.

339 N.C. 610 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 9, 1995

Board of Education v. . State Board of Education

114 N.C. 313 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1894

by the General Assembly, and when so altered, amended or repealed they shall not be re-enaeted by the Board.” … The funds coming into, the treasury of the State Board of Education, and which it is required to apportion, are a very small portion of the money to be expended for the support of the schools.

White v. Michael Brown & Son

47 N.C. 403 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1855

But it is contended for the plaintiff, that the present agreement is similar to that upon which the action in Withers v. … Winstead v. Reid, Busb. Rep. 76, and see Am. Ed. of Smith’s Leading Cases, vol. 2, p. 1, and the notes containing.the English and American cases, where *406 he subject is fully discussed and explained.

Brown, Brawley & Co. v. Bostian

51 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1858

Brown for the plaintiffs and the defendant; and John L. *3 Brown, for tbe plaintiffs,- promises to pay tbe defendant for tbe flour upon its delivery. … Rep. 90 ; Osborne v. The High Shoals Mining and, Manufacturing Company, 5 Jones’ Rep. 177.