Case law

State v. Brown

237 N.C. 439 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 25, 1953

S. v. Ray, 212 N.C. 748 , 194 S.E. 472 ; S. v. McKeon, 223 N.C. 404 , 26 S.E. 2d 914 . Tbe judgment below is Affirmed.

Brown v. Norfolk Southern Railroad

208 N.C. 423 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 18, 1935

Homans v. Tyng, 67 N. Y. Supp., 792 . Ordi--narily, tbis view might prevail (lex reprobat moram, Battle v. Mercer, 188 N. C., 116 , 123 S. … Holland v. Utilities Co., supra, It was said in Homans v.

Brown v. KINDRED NURSING CENTERS

686 S.E.2d 512 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 5, 2009

686 S.E.2d 512 (2009) BROWN v. KINDRED NURSING CENTERS. No. 227A09. Supreme Court of North Carolina. November 5, 2009. Thomas E. Harris, New Bern, for Patricia Dix, et al. Stephen J. Gugenheim, for Lenton Brown.

Brown v. Southern Railway Co.

126 N.C. 458 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 1, 1900

Brown v. Adm'r of Brady

6 N.C. 117 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1812

Leete v. County of Warren

341 N.C. 116 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 28, 1995

Huntley v. Potter, 255 N.C. 619, 628 , 122 S.E.2d 681, 686-87 (1961); accord, Painter v. Wake County Board of Education, 288 N.C. 165, 178 , 217 S.E.2d 650, 658 (1975). … The principle case on which plaintiffs rely is Brown v. Comrs. of Richmond County, 223 N.C. 744 , 28 S.E.2d 104 (1943).

State v. Board

295 N.C. 649 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 4, 1978

Brown v. Ætna Life Inurance

174 N.C. 336 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 17, 1917

Brown, J. The defendant insurance company -issued a policy upon the life of William T. … To the same effect are Evans v. Opperman, 13 S. E., 312 ; Ins. Co. v. Clough, 68 N. H., 298; Lockwood v. Bishop, 51 How. Pr. N. Y., 221.

Board of Graded School Commissioners v. Board of Education

163 N.C. 404 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 5, 1913

This language is taken from the Ordinance of Congress of 1787, passed for the government of the Northwest Territory, and was substantially adopted in the Constitution of Ohio, and was considered in Board of Education v. … It was upon this principle that it was held in Greensboro v. Hodgin, 106 N.

Brown v. American Multimedia, Inc.

360 N.C. 60 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 6, 2005

Brown v. American Multimedia, Inc.

621 S.E.2d 175 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 6, 2005

Williams v. Williams

261 N.C. 48 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 17, 1964

Kiger v. Kiger, 258 N.C. 126 , 128 S.E. 2d 235 ; Brown v. Brown, 205 N.C. 64 , 169 S.E. 818 . A resumption of -marital relations by the parties, however, will annul and rescind -the deed of separation. Turner v. … Oldham -and Taylor , although decided under G.S. 50-16, are equally applicable to a motion for temporary -alimony under G.S. 50-15 pending the trial of an action for divorce from bed and board.

State ex rel. Armfield v. Brown

70 N.C. 27 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 15, 1874

Dishner Developers, Inc. v. Brown

354 N.C. 569 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 18, 2001

557 S.E.2d 528 (2001) 354 N.C. 569 DISHNER DEVELOPERS, INC. v. Victoria BROWN. No. 528A01. Supreme Court of North Carolina. December 18, 2001. Lapping & Lapping, by Sherwood F. Lapping, Carthage, for plaintiff-appellee.

Gregory v. W.A. Brown & Sons

362 N.C. 681 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 11, 2008

Granville County Board of Education v. State Board of Education

106 N.C. 81 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1890

Raleigh and Augusta Air-Line Railroad Co. v. Jenkins, 68 N. C., 502 ; Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch, 49 . The duties here sought to be enforced are purely ministerial. The Code, §§ 2535 and 2537. … In McMinn v. Hamilton, 77 N. C., 300 , it is held, “ if the defendant pleads to the merits of the action, he will be taken to have waived the objection” to the venue. To same effect Lafoon, v. Shearin, 91 N.

Ashley v. BUSTER BROWN APPAREL

358 N.C. 233 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 22, 2004

Brown v. Elm City Lumber Co.

167 N.C. 9 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 30, 1914

Simmons v. Morse, 51 N. C., 7 . … Reid v. Providence Journal Co., 20 R. I., 120.

Brown v. Burlington Hotel Corp.

202 N.C. 82 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 8, 1932

Rose v. Davis, 188 N. C., 355 , 124 S. E., 567 . *87 There was error in tbe refusal of tbe court to allow defendant’s motion made at tbe close of tbe evidence.

County Board of Education v. State Board of Education

107 N.C. 366 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1890

On May 31st, 1884, the defendant paid over $824.25 thereof to the County Board of Education of Vance County, and immediately notified the plaintiff thereof, and the plaintiff subsequently drew for ánd received the balance … The Code, § 155 (4); Currie v. McNeill, 83 N. C , 176. This renders it unnecessary to' consider the other exceptions in the record. Per Curiam. • No error.