Case law

Roberts v. Life Insurance Co.

118 N.C. 429 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1896

It was admitted on the argument here that Miller v. … Taylor v. Iron Co. , 94 N.C. 525 ; Best v. Kinston , 106 N.C. 205 . There is no error and the judgment is affirmed. DEFENDANT'S APPEAL.

Anderson v. Cashion

265 N.C. 555 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 1965

Rubber Co. v. Distributors, 253 N.C. 459 , 117 S.E. 2d 479 . … G.S. 1-185; Wynne v. Allen, 245 N.C. 421 , 96 S.E. 2d 422 . The verdict and judgment are vacated and there will be a New trial.

Lenoir v. Linville Improvement Co.

51 L.R.A. 146 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 9, 1900

The secretary and treasurer were both, ex officio members of the board of directors that so fixed their compensation. 9. … It is cited and followed by the Circuit Court of the United States in Malcomson v. Wappoo Mills, 88 Fed. Rep., 680. This rule applies in the case at baT.

Tyree v. . Tudor

181 N.C. 214 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 13, 1921

Linville v. Nissen, 162 N. C., 95 ; Bilyeu v. Beck, 178 N. C., 481 ; but in Linville v. Nissen, sicpra, tbe father not only did not authorize, but expressly forbade, bis son to use tbe machine, and in Bilyeu v. … In Taylor v. Stewart, 172 N.

Crompton v. . Baker

220 N.C. 52 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 24, 1941

As was said in Santa Cruz Fruit Packing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 303 U. S., 453 , “It is plain that the provision cannot be applied by a mere reference to percentages.” National Labor Relations Board v. … Hart v. Gregory, supra; 132 A. L. R., 1446.

Trotter v. Commissioners of Swain County

90 N.C. 455 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1884

Did the plaintiff's assignor furnish board to prisoners of the value of the additional sum claimed in the complaint? … It is not offered as a *457 counter-claim to be ascertained and applied in extinguishing or reducing the sum'claimed by the plaintiff,- as it should be if so intended (Johnson v. Bell, 74 N.

Hyman v. . Cain

48 N.C. 111 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1855

In the case of Richardson v. Strong, 13 Ire. … The cases of Hussey v. Rountree, Bus. Rep. 110, and State v. Cook, 12 Ire.

Weeks v. McPhail.

129 N.C. 73 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 1, 1901

The petitioner also cites the case of Bond v. McNider, 25 N. C., 440 . But this is also put upon the ground that the Court had no jurisdiction. The petitioner also cites Homer v. Brown, 57 U. S., 354 . … There was no such thing as this in the ease of Raynor v. Weeks in the Courts of Sampson. In Raynor v.

Evans v. . Lovengood

54 N.C. 299 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1854

In regard to this, we refer to Wilson v. Hendricks, ante , 295. … Cited: Burgess v. Lovengood , 55 N.C. 460 .

Frick Co. v. . Shelton

201 N.C. 71 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1931

Crews v. Crews, 64 N. C., 536 ; Mitchell v. Brown, 88 N. C., 156 ; Turrentine v. R. R., 92 N. C., 638 ; Morrison v. Watson, 95 N. C., 479 ; Porter v. R. R., 97 N. C., 66 ; Allen v. Sallinger, 105 N. C., 333 . … In support of tbe verdict tbe plaintiff cites Baker v. R. R., 118 N. C., 1015 , and McKoy v. Craven, 198 N. C., 780 .

Webb v. Comm'rs. of the Town of Beaufort

70 N.C. 307 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1874

Lutterloh v. Board of Commissioners of Cumberland County, 65 N. C. R., p. 403.

Pinnix v. . Griffin

221 N.C. 348 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1942

Co. v. Moore, supra . … Myer’s Admx. v. Brown, 250 Ky., 64 , 61 S. W. (2d), 1052 ; Blue Valley Creamery v. Cronimus, 270 Ky., 496 , 110 S. W. (2d), 286 ; Freeman on Judgments (5th Ed.), sec. 469, p. 1031; Betcher v.

Bond v. . Tarboro

217 N.C. 289 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1940

In Holton v. … Lockland v. Walker , 52 N.W. (Mo.), 427; Brown v. Baptist Society , 9 R. I., 184 ; Stanly v. Colt , 72 U.S. 119 ; Jones v. Habersham , 107 U.S. 183 .

May v. National Fire Insurance

172 N.C. 795 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 22, 1916

left it to expire by limitation of law; that it is admitted by the attorneys for the plaintiff and found ■ as a fact that the judge after so leaving the courtroom signed the judgment herein while standing in front of his boarding-house … Delafield v. Construction Co., 115 N. C., 22 ; Hardee v. Timberlake, 159 N. C., 552 .

Davis v. Greensboro Warehouse & Storage Co.

186 N.C. 676 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1923

Brown, 118 N. C., 710 (36 L. R. A., 412); Caldwell v. Wilson, 121 N. C., 473, and White v. Auditor, 126 N. C., 584. Tbe same course has been pursued in many other cases since. … C., 244; Smith v. Moore, 150 N. C., 159 ; Griffin v. R. R., ib., 315; Battle v. Rocky Mount (Walker, J.), 156 N. C., 339 ; Chavis v. Brown (Hoke, J.), 174 N. C., 123 .

Madison Cablevision, Inc. v. City of Morganton

325 N.C. 634 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 7, 1989

Board of Aldermen, 200 N.C. 30 , 156 S.E. 241 (1930); Public Park: Purser v. … That exemption was announced in Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 87 L.

Russell v. Carolina Central R. R.

118 N.C. 1098 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1896

Hinkle v. Railroad, 109 N. C., 472 ; Randall v. Railroad, 104 N. C., 410 ; Gilmore v. Railroad, 115 N. C., 657 . … Morgan v. Lewis, 95 N. C., 296 ; Brown v Calloway, 90 N. C., 118 . While we see no error in the instruction given in relation to the third issue, it is not material to discuss it.

State v. Lemons

348 N.C. 335 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 9, 1998

See Brown v. … State v. Brown, 315 N.C. 40, 61 , 337 S.E.2d 808, 824 (1985), cert, denied, 476 U.S. 1164 , 90 L. Ed. 2d 733 (1986), overruled on other grounds by State v. Vandiver, 321 N.C. 570 , 364 S.E.2d 373 (1988).

Clark v. . Wagoner

70 N.C. 705 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1874

Tatem v. Paine , 11 N.C. 64 ; Marshall v. Fisher , 46 N.C. 111 . 2. … Draughan , 88 N.C. 318 ; Overcash v. Kitchie , 89 N.C. 386 ; Redmond v. Stepp , 100 N.C. 218 ; Brown v. House , 118 N.C. 877 ; Rowe v. Lumber Co. , 128 N.C. 303 ; Harper v. Anderson , 130 N.C. 540 ; Hoge v.

Buie v. . Kennedy

164 N.C. 290 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 13, 1913

The case of Walker v. Venters , 148 N.C. 388 , is not applicable, for there the writing was contradicted or varied, but our case is more like Brown v. Hobbs , *Page 240 147 N.C. 73 , which cites, Mitchell v. … Brown v. Hobbs, supra; Trowbridge v. Wetherbee , 93 Mass. (11 Allen), 364; Hess v. Fox , 10 Wendell, 436 ; Sprague v. Bond, supra . These cases are in principle like Richards v. Hodges, supra , decided at this term.